Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Lens comparison: Nikkor 2/28 vs Distagon 2.8/28
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Equipment Tests
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ChrisLilley



Level 3

Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 876
Location: Nice, France

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This comparative review at 28mm seems to show the Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AIS as consistently better than the Nikkor 28mm f/2. (text in Italian). Particularly with smeared edges, which relates to the findings in this thread, too.

The 'pro' zoom 17-35 also comes off rather poorly in that test.
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light (lenses in use)
Camera: Nikon D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 non-AI | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Nikkor-S.C 50mm f/1.4 non-AI | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Vivitar Series 1 (Kiron) 70-210 f/3.5 | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChrisLilley



Level 3

Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 876
Location: Nice, France

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Lens comparison: Nikkor 2/28 vs Distagon 2.8/28 Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
The newly grounded Nikkor 28mm suggested me to try it face to face with my main 28mm lens, the Distagon.


What vintage of 28/2 is this - there were non-AI, AI and AI-S versions, and some versions had design changes during their lifetime. I checked on your lens list but there are no details (in fact its not listed).
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light (lenses in use)
Camera: Nikon D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 non-AI | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Nikkor-S.C 50mm f/1.4 non-AI | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Vivitar Series 1 (Kiron) 70-210 f/3.5 | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai


Last edited by ChrisLilley on Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 10764
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laurence wrote:
Orio, the differences are remarkable. On the antennae images, do you think some of that might be camera shake?


The centre frame does not show such problem, if it was camera shake then the whole image would be blurred.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Russian, Zeiss, Leitz, old Nikkors.
DSLR: Canon 5D, 400D. SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM, Nikon FM2, Canon 50E, Contax 167MT.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 10764
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Lens comparison: Nikkor 2/28 vs Distagon 2.8/28 Reply with quote

ChrisLilley wrote:

What vintage of 28/2 is this - there were non-AI, AI and AI-S versions, and some versions had design changes during their lifetime. I checked on your lens list but there are no details (in fact its not listed).


It is a Nikkor-N Auto with scalloped focusing ring.
I think it's pre-AI
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Russian, Zeiss, Leitz, old Nikkors.
DSLR: Canon 5D, 400D. SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM, Nikon FM2, Canon 50E, Contax 167MT.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 10764
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChrisLilley wrote:
This comparative review at 28mm seems to show the Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AIS as consistently better than the Nikkor 28mm f/2. (text in Italian). Particularly with smeared edges, which relates to the findings in this thread, too.
The 'pro' zoom 17-35 also comes off rather poorly in that test.


Yes, corners seem to be a weak point in the 2/28
Mine is older than the one used for the test.
My Nikkor-N 2/28 is not a sharp lens, but I like the output. It's a bit dreamy but it has a personality that comes out of moody subjects, and when sharpness is not the issue, it can be useful. I think for instance of marine landscapes, or churches, subjects where you like the picture to have a certain mood.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Russian, Zeiss, Leitz, old Nikkors.
DSLR: Canon 5D, 400D. SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM, Nikon FM2, Canon 50E, Contax 167MT.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ChrisLilley



Level 3

Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 876
Location: Nice, France

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Lens comparison: Nikkor 2/28 vs Distagon 2.8/28 Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
ChrisLilley wrote:

What vintage of 28/2 is this - there were non-AI, AI and AI-S versions, and some versions had design changes during their lifetime. I checked on your lens list but there are no details (in fact its not listed).


It is a Nikkor-N Auto with scalloped focusing ring.
I think it's pre-AI


OK so this one. 9 elements in 8 groups, has NIC, no CRC.

Thanks for the clarification; your report had quite shocked me how bad the Nikkor was. Hopefully the later models (and the f/2.8) are better.
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light (lenses in use)
Camera: Nikon D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 non-AI | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Nikkor-S.C 50mm f/1.4 non-AI | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Vivitar Series 1 (Kiron) 70-210 f/3.5 | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 13289
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Later model Nikkor 28cm f2.8 close focus (20cm) has 5 star rating almost any review.My favorite is 24mm f2.8 AIS.
_________________

Olympus E-1,Nikon FA,Pentax MX,Praktica VLC3,Olympus-OM2N,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,Exakta Varex IIb,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,2.8/180mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mjkerpan




Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 27
Location: Boston, USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChrisLilley wrote:
This comparative review at 28mm seems to show the Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AIS as consistently better than the Nikkor 28mm f/2. (text in Italian). Particularly with smeared edges, which relates to the findings in this thread, too.

The 'pro' zoom 17-35 also comes off rather poorly in that test.

No sign of my Series E 28mm f/2.8, though. I'd love to know how it stacks up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Equipment Tests All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group