View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
_________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
OK, who said that the old version cannot produce great pictures?
Whoever said that, he has probably never used one.
Stunning shots! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
timo832000
Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Posts: 544 Location: Germany / Cologne
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
timo832000 wrote:
I also own the first version of this lens in nearly mint condition optically it`s good but the second version is much better especially wide open.
It`s sensitive to flare but the snap on hood solves this problem.
Mechanically this lens is great and a pleasure to focus.
Timo _________________ I love Leica ! But I need Pentax |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
timo832000 wrote: |
I also own the first version of this lens in nearly mint condition optically it`s good but the second version is much better especially wide open.
It`s sensitive to flare but the snap on hood solves this problem.
Mechanically this lens is great and a pleasure to focus.
Timo |
+1
The E55 Version ist far better wide open, especially on FF cams.
The improvement is really fantastic. With the old one you have to stop down the lens for 2 f-stops.. for maximum performance wide open..
With the E55 Version you need only 1 f-stop for that and have a far better performance..
Follow this link (right clicking on the link) and open in a new browser Tab to see in high resolution, who the E55 Version performes wide open at f/2.8 EOS 5D.. wandering around in the image by click in the image again..
http://dunkelnetz.de/images/objektivtests/elmarit_2.8_35mm/postkartenstaender.JPG
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
On a 4/3 cam the differences will not be as visible as you say. Not even on an APS crop cam. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BenediktW
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 Posts: 336 Location: Solingen, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BenediktW wrote:
This new version (E55) is another striking evidence for primes with a modest max. aperture often being superior in terms of sharpness and overall image quality. I have already observed this with many Nikkors. _________________ http://www.1979fotographie.de/
Nikon D90, Sony NEX-3
AF-Nikkors 24mm F2,8, 35mm F1,8 DX, 85mm F1,8, 28-105mm F3,5-4,5D IF
Nikon MF: Nikkor 20mm F4, Nikkor 50mm F2 Ai, Micro-Nikkor-P 55mm F3,5, Nikkor 135mm F2,8 Ai, Nikkor 200mm F4
Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135mm F2,8 [for sale], Vario-Sonnar 80-200mm F4 T* (C/Y) with Leitax for Nikon-F
Minolta MD-Rokkors: 28mm F2,8, 45mm F2
M42 Lenses: Mamiya/Sekor SX 21mm F4, SX 28mm F2,8, SX 55mm F1,8, SX 135mm F2,8, 400mm F6,3 [for sale], Asahi-Pentax Super-Tak. 28mm F3,5 and 55mm F1,8, CZJ Tessar 50mm F2,8, Vivitar 135mm F2,8
Mamiya 645 Lenses: Mamiya Sekor C 80mm F2,8 N, 300mm F5,6, 105-210mm F4,5 ULD [for sale] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
OK, who said that the old version cannot produce great pictures?
Whoever said that, he has probably never used one.
Stunning shots! |
+2 Carsten! _________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
hinnerker wrote: |
timo832000 wrote: |
I also own the first version of this lens in nearly mint condition optically it`s good but the second version is much better especially wide open.
It`s sensitive to flare but the snap on hood solves this problem.
Mechanically this lens is great and a pleasure to focus.
Timo |
+1
The E55 Version ist far better wide open, especially on FF cams.
The improvement is really fantastic. With the old one you have to stop down the lens for 2 f-stops.. for maximum performance wide open..
With the E55 Version you need only 1 f-stop for that and have a far better performance..
Follow this link (right clicking on the link) and open in a new browser Tab to see in high resolution, who the E55 Version performes wide open at f/2.8 EOS 5D.. wandering around in the image by click in the image again..
http://dunkelnetz.de/images/objektivtests/elmarit_2.8_35mm/postkartenstaender.JPG
Cheers
Henry |
Henry, the EXIF noted the lens as 50/2 (not 35/2. set at f/2 in Canon 5D - is it just the adapter?
But the lens resolution is stunning! (I'm looking at the postcard 100% magnification) _________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
yadisl wrote: |
hinnerker wrote: |
timo832000 wrote: |
I also own the first version of this lens in nearly mint condition optically it`s good but the second version is much better especially wide open.
It`s sensitive to flare but the snap on hood solves this problem.
Mechanically this lens is great and a pleasure to focus.
Timo |
+1
The E55 Version ist far better wide open, especially on FF cams.
The improvement is really fantastic. With the old one you have to stop down the lens for 2 f-stops.. for maximum performance wide open..
With the E55 Version you need only 1 f-stop for that and have a far better performance..
Follow this link (right clicking on the link) and open in a new browser Tab to see in high resolution, who the E55 Version performes wide open at f/2.8 EOS 5D.. wandering around in the image by click in the image again..
http://dunkelnetz.de/images/objektivtests/elmarit_2.8_35mm/postkartenstaender.JPG
Cheers
Henry |
Henry, the EXIF noted the lens as 50/2 (not 35/2. set at f/2 in Canon 5D - is it just the adapter?
But the lens resolution is stunning! (I'm looking at the postcard 100% magnification) |
Hi,
Quote: |
Henry, the EXIF noted the lens as 50/2 (not 35/2. set at f/2 in Canon 5D - is it just the adapter? |
Yes the adapter is one of the non programmable types.. it reports the 2.0/50mm to the exifs.. but the shot was taken with the
Leica Elmarit 2.8/35mm, wide open !!!
This shows, how fantastic the newer formula works.. this one is my fav 35mm.
Cheers _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
For those of you who are interested to see more samples of the second version in high resolution..
Choose picture.. click in the picture for high res.. use the back button of your browser to come back to the album thumbs.. test pics for barrel distortion and so on..
choose.. then always click to enlarge, twice to fit in window.. browser back button ..back to album.
http://dunkelnetz.de/?level=album&id=26
cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
This lens seems to have minimum distortion - stitched easily without any distortion correction.
_________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Wow! Fantastic b&w shot! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
yadisl wrote: |
This lens seems to have minimum distortion - stitched easily without any distortion correction.
|
You can see it better in that way..
Open the E55 Version and also the old lens has barrel distortion.. looks like this..
EOS 5D, Elmarit 2.8/35mm II (E55) @2.8
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Henry: Yes, I agree, the barrel distortion is quite pronounced in that FF brick shot. But, I guess it doesn't show that much distortion in 4/3 (although the it still may have other kind of problems. I'm still happy with the lens overall performance. _________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
yadisl wrote: |
I'm still happy with the lens overall performance. |
It would be surprising if you weren't.
I was as well. The only reason why I sold it was the Summicron 2/35, which is not necessarily better, just faster.
And since I am an AL shooter, I need speed.
(Hey, don't tell me there are 1.4/35 lenses. I cannot afford them. ) _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Another sample taken today
_________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Playing with some strawberries ..
_________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
I too have fallen in love at first sight of your first image.
I am cleaning my Flek 35/2.4 and I will see if it approaches this wonderful performance..
Congrats _________________ Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yadisl
Joined: 03 Dec 2009 Posts: 180 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yadisl wrote:
Thinking RED
_________________ Tell me what you love, I will tell you who you are (Proust)
TLR yashica 635, 124
Canon canonet 1.9
Olympus E500
KM Dynax 7D
Sigma DP1
Rokkor MD 200/4, MD 50/1.4, MC PF 50/1.4, MD 135/3.5, Pentax SMC-M 50/4 macro, Takumar 105/2.8, Jena DDR 135/3.5, Porst 135/2.8, Prinzgalaxy 300/4, Mamiya ZE 300/4, Jena Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, CZJ Flektogon 4/20, Helios 58/2, Konica Hexar AR 50/1.4, Wollensak Velostigmat 90/4.5, Voigtlander Heliar 18 cm / 4.5, Heliar 15 cm / 4.5, APO Lanthar 15 cm / 4.5, Zeiss Tessar 105/3.5, Zeiss Opton 75/3.5, Mamiya 55/2.8, ZD 14-42, Minolta 17-35/2.8-4 D, Petri 35/3.5, Leica-R 35/2.8, Minolta 70-210/4, Minolta 35-70/4, Minolta 50/1.7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
francotirador wrote: |
I am cleaning my Flek 35/2.4 and I will see if it approaches this wonderful performance..
Congrats |
It will. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
To warm up this thread, some shots with the 3-cam E55 Version, the successor of the Leica 2.8/35mm (Leicaflex Era) in natural light conditions and on the shortest possible distance (0.26m), taken with the Canon EOS 5D MKII.. Serial# near 3.000.000
Everything has to go fast on this shooting..
First the complete image to show the shooting distance.. and the crop out of it..
Crop
complete..
crop..
complete
crop...
seemed this guy wants to hypnotise and assimilate me and the Leica Lens to beeing a "cyborg" in the future
Keep in mind... this is not a macro lens ! This is the next version/generation of the lens.. not the old Leicaflex formula.
No PP, @f3.5.. to see in the viewfinder, what this guy was doing..
not using the focus ring.. only oscillating on the point of sharpness.
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de
Last edited by hinnerker on Sat May 29, 2010 7:40 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
wow! that's a cute guy _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
symphonic
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 550 Location: SE Europe, Croatia
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
symphonic wrote:
The crop is great. Almost unbelievable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
symphonic wrote: |
The crop is great. Almost unbelievable. |
Yes, the newer version of the lens is the best of the f2.8/35mm lenses i have seen in this class. Razor sharp from edge to edge.. maximum IQ one f-stop behind and with a lovely bokeh.
Not in this particular situation.. but in general.
In this situation the lens was on the cam.. it has to go fast.
This lens (i did own both versions, the old Leicaflex formula and the newer one and also the Summicron 2/35 in E55 Version).. this is the best of this lenses in my eyes.
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|