Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Komura 1.8/100
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding size and weight it can compare to newer line of 2.8/135 lenses, a bit heavier then Pancolar1.8/50 zebra and a bit bigger then Vivitar 2.5/28. Smaller then Tamron 2.8/90 AD2. This is rather small lens. I do not know is this information valuable.
At the photo below with Tamron 2.8/90 AD2 - Komura with Uni mount and M42/PK, Tamron - "naked"



PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



S/N 65506

Lens was discussed here before: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53934

I've found the results on my Spotmatics very pleasing, but the nearest distance isn't very close (1.4m/ 4.5ft). It's a very short and lightweight lens for a fast 100mm. It's about the size of the early postwar Biotar 75/1.5, which wasn't particular heavy.
Probably the 100/1.8 is an Ernostar design, like most fast telephotos made by Komura. I've just seen a diagram from the 100/2.0 which was made in 1964, some years before, but looks very similar to the 100/1.8 from outline.
All of them seem to be in small S/N range of about 65,xxx-66,xxxx. Probably production was ~ 1,000 or lower.


PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My Komura 100/1.8 is serial number 68xxx, so there's probably more than 1000 made.

The rear element is really large, but far from the lens mount. I suspect that the Exakta Unidapter mount I have on it for use on my Topcon "constrains" the light somewhat, due to the small "throat" of the Exakta mount.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

John Shriver wrote:
My Komura 100/1.8 is serial number 68xxx, so there's probably more than 1000 made.

My 105/2.0 is in the same range. I don't think the whole range of numbers was filled.


PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of my old dream ;
Miss this one on the bay :

Very rare Crying or Very sad


PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

very nice lens!


PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very interesting. Some might remember I recently purchased an INA 180mm lens that we knew very little about. I looked at another INA which was a 135mm and the seller said "twin KOMURA Sankyo KOHKI JAPAN , produced in the same factory". It has 12 blades to diaphragm if I counted right. Is there anything that might be unique to a Komura build?


PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila: I saw from a couple of years ago you had a Komura 135mm. How was that lens? From the samples I've seen, the Komura bokeh looks exceptional.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have two Komura 135's in M42, f/2.8 and 3.5

Bokeh is excellent, but the distinguishing feature is the handling of color.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

woodrim wrote:
Very interesting. Some might remember I recently purchased an INA 180mm lens that we knew very little about. I looked at another INA which was a 135mm and the seller said "twin KOMURA Sankyo KOHKI JAPAN , produced in the same factory". It has 12 blades to diaphragm if I counted right. Is there anything that might be unique to a Komura build?

Over 20 diaphragm blades for the 1.8 quoting the seller.


PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone asked the weight -- a hefty 19 ounces.

It takes 62mm filters.

I got mine for $120 in 2004 on eBay. Came with M42 Unidapter mount, had to buy the 135/2.8 to get Exakta Unidapter mount. (That only cost $13.)


PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems to be a more than great lens, I'm very jealous!


PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pics looks like from some cine lens. Amazing. Congrats.