View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
FotoPilot
Joined: 25 May 2019 Posts: 3 Location: España
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 4:42 pm Post subject: Kenlock Mc·Tor MC 1:3.9 80-205 |
|
|
FotoPilot wrote:
Good evening everyone,
I'm new on the forum and ended up here looking for information about a manual focus lens I own. My father bought it sometime during the 70s or early 80s I suppose and I would love to have information on it.
It's a Kenloc Mc·Tor MC 1:3.9 80-205
It hasn't got focus ranges (those lines that help you with the depth of field) and I'm curious as to why.
Any help guys?
Thanks!!
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1121
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/vivitar-85-205mm-f-3-8.html
Is this your lens? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3462 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 5:13 pm Post subject: Re: Kenlock Mc·Tor MC 1:3.9 80-205 |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
FotoPilot wrote: |
Good evening everyone,
I'm new on the forum and ended up here looking for information about a manual focus lens I own. My father bought it sometime during the 70s or early 80s I suppose and I would love to have information on it.
It's a Kenloc Mc·Tor MC 1:3.9 80-205
It hasn't got focus ranges (those lines that help you with the depth of field) and I'm curious as to why.
Any help guys?
Thanks!!
#1
#2
|
_________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 631 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
2 touch zooms don't generally have 'depth of focus' markings, presumably because the depth of focus changes as a function on aperture AND focal length, making it near impossible to do. It is often done on 1 touch zooms, as it is easier to implement as the focus adjustment moves back and forward along the barrel.
In my experience Kenlock lenses are normally (often) manufactured by Mitake/Mitakon, but I have to admit I'm not familiar with this particular model. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1658
|
Posted: Sun May 26, 2019 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Who made kenlock lenses?
Is the same that made Paximat lenses? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FotoPilot
Joined: 25 May 2019 Posts: 3 Location: España
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
FotoPilot wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
https://www.pentaxforums.com/userreviews/vivitar-85-205mm-f-3-8.html
Is this your lens? |
Not exactly. It's similar but it's not like mine.
This one is the one I own:
http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/759-kenlock-mc-tor-mc-80-205mm-f-3-9-22
Last edited by FotoPilot on Mon May 27, 2019 11:15 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FotoPilot
Joined: 25 May 2019 Posts: 3 Location: España
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
FotoPilot wrote:
Alun Thomas wrote: |
2 touch zooms don't generally have 'depth of focus' markings, presumably because the depth of focus changes as a function on aperture AND focal length, making it near impossible to do. It is often done on 1 touch zooms, as it is easier to implement as the focus adjustment moves back and forward along the barrel.
In my experience Kenlock lenses are normally (often) manufactured by Mitake/Mitakon, but I have to admit I'm not familiar with this particular model. |
Thanks! What do you mean by 1 or 2 touch zooms? I don't understand... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2494
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
FotoPilot wrote: |
Alun Thomas wrote: |
2 touch zooms don't generally have 'depth of focus' markings, presumably because the depth of focus changes as a function on aperture AND focal length, making it near impossible to do. It is often done on 1 touch zooms, as it is easier to implement as the focus adjustment moves back and forward along the barrel.
In my experience Kenlock lenses are normally (often) manufactured by Mitake/Mitakon, but I have to admit I'm not familiar with this particular model. |
Thanks! What do you mean by 1 or 2 touch zooms? I don't understand... |
One touch are slide zooms where the focus ring slides up and down over the barrel You can zoom and focus in one movement hence one touch. Two touch have a separate zoom ring you turn to zoom in and out so you have to adjust both separately. Hence two touch. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I've had one of these for a long time, Canon FD mount. It's not a bad lens, but it is up against stiff competition from the many very good 70-210's from Minolta, and Vivitar's Series 1 which are legendary. And that's why my Kenlock is rarely used. It just isn't as good, but for the price it probably sold for back in the day it was a perfectly good lens for those of us on a tight budget. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 631 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue May 28, 2019 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
I've had one of these for a long time, Canon FD mount. It's not a bad lens, but it is up against stiff competition from the many very good 70-210's from Minolta, and Vivitar's Series 1 which are legendary. And that's why my Kenlock is rarely used. It just isn't as good, but for the price it probably sold for back in the day it was a perfectly good lens for those of us on a tight budget. |
I've tried many, many third party (and camera maker) zooms from the 60s, 70s and 80s, and found exactly as you describe. The top tier was shared by some of the better camera manufacturers, some of the Vivitar Series 1 lenses, and some of Tamrons SP lenses. The occasion other third party effort will come close (but no cigar), whilst in general the average third party lens was usable, but not what you'd call 'good'. There was improvement into the mid 80's, but then many of the small makers closed shop in the face of auto focus technology. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|