View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MartinV
Joined: 09 May 2013 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 9:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
MartinV wrote:
What about the A7? I have a J12 I'd like to try, but have been reluctant to do so because I'm worried about shutter clearance with the big rear element. I understand that people here have used it successfully, but did you take any precautions or measurements to make sure it's OK? Is it safe for all focus positions including infinity? I think my current adapter is a bit on the thick side, so there's a bit of additional margin, but at some point I'd like to get the correct thickness to get proper infinity on various L39 lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GoldMark
Joined: 21 Aug 2012 Posts: 185 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
GoldMark wrote:
I have the Contax RF/Kiev 4 version of this lens. It works fine at Sony A7 (infinity is reached). But it doesn' fit to other Sony NEX Cams. _________________ Best regards
Bernhard
https://deramateurphotograph.de/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
dan_ wrote: |
Or to cut the rear lens in a rectangular shape with the dimensions of the APS-C sensor, keep the lens focused closer when you mount it on the camera and after it is mounted you could focus to infinity. Just need to remember to only mount and unmount it when it's focused to the closest distance. |
cutting in rectangular shape can be done, but mind the rotation of the lens when will be mounted _________________ TELLTALE
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
MartinV wrote: |
What about the A7? I have a J12 I'd like to try, but have been reluctant to do so because I'm worried about shutter clearance with the big rear element. I understand that people here have used it successfully, but did you take any precautions or measurements to make sure it's OK? Is it safe for all focus positions including infinity? I think my current adapter is a bit on the thick side, so there's a bit of additional margin, but at some point I'd like to get the correct thickness to get proper infinity on various L39 lenses. |
I didn't get any measurements but I've taken shots at max and min focus distance without any problem on the A7
http://www.telltale.it/black-and-white-october/ _________________ TELLTALE
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
I have too on the A7R and I measured the clearance to be 1.8mm
There is some color shift on A7R so I use the Flatfield plugin to correct, but A7 should have less problems.
http://manuellfokus.no/jupiter-12-35mm-f2-8/ _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1054 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Rick1779 wrote: |
cutting in rectangular shape can be done, but mind the rotation of the lens when will be mounted |
Ian said that the lens can be mounted on NEX but it can't reach infinity.
It will need to be mounted/unmounted only when the focusing helicoid is extended to maximum (minimum focusing distance). Then it can be focused to infinity if it's cut rectangular.
But that's only possible if wile focusing the lens doesn't rotate and I don't know if this is the case. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The best way is definitely to remove some plastic from the NEX rather than hack the back of the lens I think.
The amount of plastic needed to be removed is the distance the helicoid travels between infinity and mfd. It's not far, I reckon no more than 2mm.
I have seen pics on the net of NEX so modified. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
I have too on the A7R and I measured the clearance to be 1.8mm
There is some color shift on A7R so I use the Flatfield plugin to correct, but A7 should have less problems.
http://manuellfokus.no/jupiter-12-35mm-f2-8/ |
yes, on A7 isn't bad at all, just some really soft corners at wider aperture _________________ TELLTALE
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MartinV
Joined: 09 May 2013 Posts: 67
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MartinV wrote:
Tried two copies on the A7, silver 1963 and black 1987, both seemed to work shutter clearance wise, although the silver one is definitely a bit short of infinity on my adapter. Wide-open corners do look bad (blurred/smeared, didn't notice color shift), but the image center and corners stopped down seem OK. Will try to get some pictures out of them now. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The J12 should be considered an f4lens really, as at f4 it performs nicely but at 2.8 it's poor. I find the character at f4 to be very nice indeed on bw film. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sathya
Joined: 04 Feb 2015 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 3:04 am Post subject: jupiter 12 lens wuth my Lumix G3 camera |
|
|
sathya wrote:
jupiter 12 lens wuth my Lumix G3 camera without adaptor hand held shots... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sathya
Joined: 04 Feb 2015 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
sathya wrote:
jupiter 12 lens wuth my Lumix G3 camera...http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20152/8819_P1730039_1.jpg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Examples taken with Ricoh GXR-M at F2.8 (short distance ring was used):
#1
#2
_________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|