 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 11:18 pm Post subject: Isolette scans, Caution! Eyedrops needed! |
|
|
Well, this is roll #2 I collected from the ma and pa place that develops 120
film. Still practicing loading a junker roll on reels, and have to say, I don't
think I like the stainless steel ones I have. One is a Nikor, and the other is
a me-too Hewes design, both pretty much suck as to ease in loading.
Anyhoo, these are from the Agfa Isolette 4.5 using Fomapan 100 film:
This is after I cleaned all three elements of haze and am using the hood
I got from England to help control flare.
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LucisPictor


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 7837 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like the results! _________________ There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35; Summicron 2.0/50 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Zeiss 2.8/50; Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, a reply! Thanks, Carsten!
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maddog10


Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1003 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like to wait for others to reply and then......
" I agree with the above comments!"
(makes me look like I know what I am talking about)
Actually, I prefer the color shots of this area that you have posted.
I think you lose to much in the trees when using B&W. The black and grey all just starts to run together. In color the green would provide more contrast. Of the shots you posted, I like the first one the best. This is probably because you do not have heavy/deep shadowed areas, like in the other photos.
Did you ever determine the age of the camera?
The lens seems to have cleaned up rather nicely! _________________ Michael Hill
DSLR: Nikon - D3, D80, D40 Canon- 5D
Film: Nikon - F5, F2, F, EM, FG, FE, Nikkorex Contax - G2 Mamiya - M645 Olympus - OM1 Praktika - LTL PLC3 Pentax - Spotmatic SP Yashica Electro 35 GSN Zenit - B
Nikon Mount Lens: Nikkor - 2.8/20 2.8/24 2/28 2.8/28 3.5/28 2/35 2.8/35 1.4/50 1.8/50 2/50 1.8/85 2/85 2.5/105 2.8/135 3.5/135 2.8/180 4/200 4.5/300 Micro 2.8/55 Micro 4/200 Zoom 3.5/36-72 3.5/43-86 4/70-210 Sigma - Zoom 2.8-4/35-70 Soligor - 3.5-4.5/28-80 4.5/80-200 5.6/95-310 Tamron - SP 2.8-3.8/35-80 SP 3.5/70-210 3.8-4/80-210 Vivitar - 3.8/19 2.8/28 (Series 1) 3.5-4.5/19-35 (Kiron) 3.5/70-210 Zenitar - 2.8/16
Contax Mount Lens: Carl Zeiss - Biogon 2.8/21 Biogon 2.8/28 Planar 2/45 Sonnar 2.8/90 Yashica - 4.5/70-210
M42 Screw Mount Lens: CZJ - Flek 2.8/20 Flek 2.4/35 Tessar 2.8/50 3.5/135 Focal - 2.8/28 Helios - 44-2 2/58 44M 2/58 44M-4 2/58 40 1.5/85 Industar - 50-2 3.5/50 Jupiter - 37A 3.5/135 Meyer Optik Gorlitz - Domiplan 2.8/50 MIR - 24M 2/35 1B 2.8/37 Pentacon - 2.8/29 1.8/50 2.8/135 Pentax - SMC 3.5/135 SMC 4/200 SMC 5.6/400 Rexatar - 6.3/400 Rokinon - 3.5-4.5/35-135 Sears - 2.8/28 2.8/135 4.5/90-230 Soligor - 2.8/105 3.5-4.5/28-80 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike, thanks for dumping all over my pictures! There's only one pic
that is just trees the others have a building crammed in it, but yes, I know
what you mean about B&W forest pics.
Yep, the lens cleaned up nicely, rather happy that the glare is at least
reduced.
Thanks again,
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Laurence


Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 2222 Location: Western Washington State
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I certainly don't see any glare, Bill!
I'm wondering though, about that "grain", for instance in the first image. I think that, with Fomapan and with the wonderful Isolette's lens (do you have the Apotar?) the image should be much more clean. I'm tending to think that the people processing the b&w are making a mistake somewhere; I don't know much about what to look for as "results" from processing mistakes, but this just doesn't look like a camera or lens problem to me.
The only other thing could be the scanner, I guess? But I couldnt' see a scanner adding grain to an image like that.
Anyway, in a WAY I like the effect! I suppose there are photographers who would like to be able to bring an image into that effect! But, of course, the image would be awfully nice as a "grain-free" image.
The last image is the one that's starting to look pretty darn good! The shadow detail and contrastual elements look very nice. There is still "something" going on though - could it be dirty chemicals? The light area in the window looks almost like a "bad mix" of processor...
I would love to see more as you go onward, Bill! _________________
Cameras in Use: Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5, Revueflex 3003 w/ M42 lenses, Yashica Electro 35 w/ Yashinon 1.7, Voigtlander Bessa R w/ APO Lanthar 90/3.5, Contaflex 126 w/ Zeiss Pantar, Tessar, Sonnar, and Distagon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Laurence wrote: | I certainly don't see any glare, Bill!
The last image is the one that's starting to look pretty darn good! The shadow detail and contrastual elements look very nice. There is still "something" going on though - could it be dirty chemicals? The light area in the window looks almost like a "bad mix" of processor...
I would love to see more as you go onward, Bill! |
Larry, be careful what you wish for! You may have a valid point about
the processing, but they are the *only* ones in town to process BW 120
film or 35, for that matter. I have yet to do my own developing and then I'd
have only myself to blame.
Thanks for your comments!
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Farside


Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 1879 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The first one is a bit disconcerting until you see the focus is inside. I'm not too sure about the rest of them, as in the high contrast robs them of a lot of visual appeal.
It's just a personal preference, mind. _________________ Dave
The Lenses of Farside
"The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and
prosperity is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious,
arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism."
-- Czech President Vaclav Klaus |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dave, thanks for your comments, I plan on reworking these and changing
them out if I think they are better. Still need some practice processing BW
negs.
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nesster


Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 572
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm glad there are others here into these folders and TLRs ... despite the digital challenges they pose, with the scanning and so on.
In the first photo, it seems like scanner noise to me, perhaps the negative is underexposed? LOL in a zone system maybe you'd have chosen the photo to be very dark save the daylight bits... which would then make the scanner noise disappear.
It's a good camera with a remarkable lens you have there. _________________ Camera Fetishism:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nesster/sets/72157601067248451/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster, I'm going to scan some of these negs again tonight and use the
adjustments in the Epson software prior to scanning, will see what shakes.
Will be ordering the variable height and included ANR glass very soon from
BetterScanning.
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I rescanned and reworked this one, dunno if it's an improvement or
not:
and another:
I think it is, but I may be losing my objectivity. LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schnauzer


Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 730 Location: Maine
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I find it very hard to judge a lot of B&W images. I think my favorite of all these is the last one in the first series Bill. _________________ Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Katastrofo


Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 4362 Location: Alabama
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Schnauzer wrote: | | I find it very hard to judge a lot of B&W images. I think my favorite of all these is the last one in the first series Bill. |
I agree, Ron, the last one first set is probably the best one in the roll.
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|