View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JMC
Joined: 29 May 2018 Posts: 178 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 2:22 pm Post subject: Initial shots with Nikon Micro-NIKKOR 55mm f/3.5 |
|
|
JMC wrote:
Picked up an early 55mm f3.5 Micro-Nikkor on eBay recently - I was the only bidder . Based on the serial number I think it's from the late 60s or very early 70s. A couple of initial shots with it on my Canon EOS 5DSR. ISO400 and f11. Cropped from the original, to about half the original size. Fly on an Oxeye daisy in the garden. It feels like a beautiful lens.
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Outstanding!
Congrats on your purchase of your 55/3.5 Micro Nikkor. IMO, this is one of the best ever macro lenses ever made. I have an even older copy that I've owned for over 25 years. Mine dates to 1965.
I haven't yet attempted any really close macro work with mine besides duping slides -- which it does very, very well. I should do something about that. Insects make marvelous subjects and sometimes they stay still long enough to get a good shot of them. I've taken lots of flower photos with mine, but they tend not to be anywhere close to maximum magnification because I'm after an image of the entire flower . . . although I can think of one exception.
Taken with a 10.1mp Canon XS DSLR at ISO 100:
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2926 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
A very nice lens indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JMC
Joined: 29 May 2018 Posts: 178 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JMC wrote:
Thanks. Actually I just rechecked the serial number. It looks like it is from the 1963-1966 era. Even better |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
A superb lens, one of my favourites. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
willy35
Joined: 17 Jul 2017 Posts: 97 Location: BREIZH
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
willy35 wrote:
The sharpness of this lens is awesome ! _________________ Sony A7
Only shoot with CHEAP manual lenses
http://dirtcheapvintagelens.blogspot.fr
http://500px.com/jgabby_fr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Focusthrow
Joined: 12 Sep 2017 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Focusthrow wrote:
Nice shots with this gem of a lens guys! I like it so much, I own 3, different versions of it, along wit the Viv-komine 55mm f/ 2.8. Someday I'll give in and sell a couple of them. jt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
a well known gem that is!! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Focusthrow wrote: |
Nice shots with this gem of a lens guys! I like it so much, I own 3, different versions of it, along wit the Viv-komine 55mm f/ 2.8. Someday I'll give in and sell a couple of them. jt |
Heh, I do too! I own the old 1965 version, then two of the more recent pre-AI with the rubberized focusing collar. One is pretty heavily worn, the other is pristine and has a Nikon AI conversion kit. Plus I also own a 55/2.8 AIs. And you know what? As remarkably good as the 55/3.5s are, that AIs version is noticeably sharper.
I haven't sold any of mine (yet) because they just don't bring much on the used market. It's hardly worth my time and trouble to sell them. But I have no idea what I'm gonna do with three of them. Well, actually, that's not entirely true. I'm gonna keep the old one just because I've owned it for so many years, it's part of the family. And the pristine one I hesitate to sell because I probably won't get what it's worth for it. The worn one, though, is the one that's probably not worth the bother. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
willy35
Joined: 17 Jul 2017 Posts: 97 Location: BREIZH
|
Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
willy35 wrote:
Wait for Nikon and Canon FF mirrorless camera, and you will see, used market will increase again _________________ Sony A7
Only shoot with CHEAP manual lenses
http://dirtcheapvintagelens.blogspot.fr
http://500px.com/jgabby_fr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JMC
Joined: 29 May 2018 Posts: 178 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
JMC wrote:
Couple of pictures of the lens itself.
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
So, are you aware that your lens has been "AI'd" by someone other than Nikon? I can see where the notch was machined, and they also removed the meter coupling "shoe," so you're lens will not couple with the meter on the older Nikons. But I think the shoes are pretty easy to come by, so no worries there. Only possible concern though might be the way the aperture ring was machined. I've seen some where the machining actually removed part of the shoe. And yours looks like one of them, which is no doubt why the shoe was removed. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JMC
Joined: 29 May 2018 Posts: 178 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JMC wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
So, are you aware that your lens has been "AI'd" by someone other than Nikon? I can see where the notch was machined, and they also removed the meter coupling "shoe," so you're lens will not couple with the meter on the older Nikons. But I think the shoes are pretty easy to come by, so no worries there. Only possible concern though might be the way the aperture ring was machined. I've seen some where the machining actually removed part of the shoe. And yours looks like one of them, which is no doubt why the shoe was removed. |
Ooooh, I was not aware. In fact I'd not heard of that being done before, so will go and have a read about it now. Would other photos be helpful to better see what has been done? I'm a Canon user, not a Nikon one, so I'm using this on my Canon SLR via an adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
JMC wrote: |
cooltouch wrote: |
So, are you aware that your lens has been "AI'd" by someone other than Nikon? I can see where the notch was machined, and they also removed the meter coupling "shoe," so you're lens will not couple with the meter on the older Nikons. But I think the shoes are pretty easy to come by, so no worries there. Only possible concern though might be the way the aperture ring was machined. I've seen some where the machining actually removed part of the shoe. And yours looks like one of them, which is no doubt why the shoe was removed. |
Ooooh, I was not aware. In fact I'd not heard of that being done before, so will go and have a read about it now. Would other photos be helpful to better see what has been done? I'm a Canon user, not a Nikon one, so I'm using this on my Canon SLR via an adapter. |
Jonathan, this modification will have no impact on your work IMHO if used with an adapter,
only on the possible resale price, if you'll ever decide you'll dispose it, which I actually doubt. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Focusthrow
Joined: 12 Sep 2017 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Focusthrow wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
Focusthrow wrote: |
Nice shots with this gem of a lens guys! I like it so much, I own 3, different versions of it, along wit the Viv-komine 55mm f/ 2.8. Someday I'll give in and sell a couple of them. jt |
Heh, I do too! I own the old 1965 version, then two of the more recent pre-AI with the rubberized focusing collar. One is pretty heavily worn, the other is pristine and has a Nikon AI conversion kit. Plus I also own a 55/2.8 AIs. And you know what? As remarkably good as the 55/3.5s are, that AIs version is noticeably sharper.
I haven't sold any of mine (yet) because they just don't bring much on the used market. It's hardly worth my time and trouble to sell them. But I have no idea what I'm gonna do with three of them. Well, actually, that's not entirely true. I'm gonna keep the old one just because I've owned it for so many years, it's part of the family. And the pristine one I hesitate to sell because I probably won't get what it's worth for it. The worn one, though, is the one that's probably not worth the bother. |
My situation is not unlike yours Michael--some people acquire cats; we acquire lenses. Agreed--selling (at this price range) is not usually worth the effort & the longer you keep one hanging around the less likely it is to see the USPS or UPS guy again. LOL Seriously though, I wonder what yearly shipping costs tally to, just for lens sales on Ebay! Best jt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JMC
Joined: 29 May 2018 Posts: 178 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
JMC wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Jonathan, this modification will have no impact on your work IMHO if used with an adapter,
only on the possible resale price, if you'll ever decide you'll dispose it, which I actually doubt. |
Thanks Klaus. It looks to be working fine for my needs and no I hadn't planned on selling it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2018 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Focusthrow wrote: |
Seriously though, I wonder what yearly shipping costs tally to, just for lens sales on Ebay! Best jt |
An interesting question. Here in the US, with an item like a lens weighing, let's say, less than a pound, and shipped from a domestic address via USPS Priority Mail, you're probably averaging around $10 per. So, easy enough to estimate. Of course, if you shop oversees, which I often do, then that estimate goes out the window. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|