| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 393
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 4:57 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
| harry tibi wrote: |
Ah, there it is. Forgot how to upload a picture. |
BEHOLD... THE SINGULARITY!
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Posts: 669
Location: Home
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Good that I've checked wiki and found out that Pentax 110 has no aperture control.
P.S. I have CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 M42. A colleague ofered me to exchange it to Leica lens(he does not remembers the name but he said it is 35mm and for M39 mount). He'll bring the lens tomorrow, so let's see.
_________________
I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
| CuriousOne wrote: |
Good that I've checked wiki and found out that Pentax 110 has no aperture control.
|
well, it was also on my post  .
I wish also to remember your requirements that led me suggest a I-69 or some disposable camera lens:
| CuriousOne wrote: |
| Inexpensive - I mean bargain ,old school, one that can be found at pawn shop and so on. Less than $50. Preferably, better than $10 Smile For "serious" shooting, I have native lens, so I'm looking for tiny, inexpensive, trashy lens. |
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 393
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
| CuriousOne wrote: |
| P.S. I have CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 M42. A colleague offered me to exchange it to Leica lens(he does not remembers the name but he said it is 35mm and for M39 mount). |
If it's an original Leica, you definitely got the better end of that deal...
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Posts: 669
Location: Home
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
I 69 and I 22 already got for almost nothing and are on their way. Also Got I50Y - enlarge lens, and despite ugly shape, it performs quite good.
_________________
I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
| CuriousOne wrote: |
| I 69 and I 22 already got for almost nothing and are on their way. Also Got I50Y - enlarge lens, and despite ugly shape, it performs quite good. |
for the I-69, remember you have to shorten an adapter (I bought one attached to its camera, and used the camera mount instead of the internal ring of the adapter). It is worst than the 22, but... tiny and right focal length for all purposes. Another one I badly adapted is the 40/2.8 from a Ricoh rangefinder, but overall size is slightly more.
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6008
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
I don't know if this has been mentioned already, but a very cheap lens with a good reputation that is also quite small is the Industar 50-2.
It can be had in silver as well as black and is a 3.5/50mm lens - a tessar copy in M42.
Can usually be found for $10+
OH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boris_Akunin
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 393
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boris_Akunin wrote:
| Oldhand wrote: |
I don't know if this has been mentioned already, but a very cheap lens with a good reputation that is also quite small is the Industar 50-2.
It can be had in silver as well as black and is a 3.5/50mm lens - a tessar copy in M42.
Can usually be found for $10+
OH |
The M42 is small but you need a big adapter, the M39 version just has the adapter built in.
Here's a good comparison:
http://forum.mflenses.com/industar-50-5cm-red-p-f3-5-leica-screw-l39-sony-nex-m39-t39927.html
_________________
Sony: A7 | Samyang FE 35/2.8 | Sony FE 85/1.8
Pentax: K-5 | K28/3.5 | M50/1.7 | DA18-135/3.5-5.6 | F35-70/3.5-4.5
Minolta: X-500 | XD | MD35/2.8 | MC50/1.4 | MD200/4 | MD75-150/4
Canon: nFD24/2.8 | nFD35/2 | nFD50/1.4 | nFD300/5.6 | nFD35-105/3.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Posts: 669
Location: Home
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Got Industar i61/LD.
Works OK, but it's screw mount is wobbling. 3 screws are tightened, but mount itself still moves back and forward.
_________________
I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013
Posts: 669
Location: Home
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
And also, it does not looks that "compact" as I'd like it to be
_________________
I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6008
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
That should be a good lens.
Just for comparison here is the Industar 50-2 - yes I realise it is M42 and would need adapter but here it is anyway.
OH
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
