View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:02 am Post subject: Industar-50-2 |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Attila made me a beautiful gift, a really most beautiful looking copy of Industar-50-2, a lens that I only had a defektive copy of.
Attila's copy is a different story, it is amazingly sharp even wide open, as these images will prove, because the weather was so crappy that I could only shoot wide open or stop down one stop maximum.
I think you will immediately see the power of this lens even in the small resizes, just compare with the Nikkor-UD and you will see this is a lens of really another class, powerful and bold even with crappy weather!
At the end I added a few B&W conversions, to show the power of this lens, which for me, is a fantastic B&W lens, where it can really give it's best.
So thanks Attila!
This is the sample gallery:
www.orio.ws/temp/industar-50-2/index.html
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Note that pictures 6 and 7 have false colours, because I forgot to convert them to SRGB prior to jpg conversion, so they look pale - they are not really. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Orio, if you accepted this lens from Attila as a gift, in Hungary it means
you're going steady...don't know if this was explained to you.
Wow, I need to drag my lens out and shoot it some more! I like 4, 8, and
9 of this set, some great shots!
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Thanks Bill
I have no idea of what "going steady" means, I hope it's not something bad
I find the little Industar so perfect for Black and White. Perhaps it's beacuse it is so contrasted. Then there is the Tessar factor to it. I want to load a B&W film in the Bessie and go out with her and the Industar alone and see what roll comes out.
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice set! I am glad you like it, Bill this lens mostly going around 10 USD or less I hope it will be next "Trioplan" many member try to get one. This is a shame why people not respect this excellent little one. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Attila, I have this lens in a thread here somewhere with how it looks on
my Oly e300, makes it look like a point and shoot! I think I paid less
than $25 shipping included, not sure, cheap, anyway. EDIT: I paid
$15, with shipping! Came in a nice plastic watertight canister, in case I wanted to take it sea kayaking...
Orio certainly got some nice contrasty BW pics...
Bill
Last edited by Katastrofo on Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
It's a natural for B&W, heck it was born for B&W, all Tessars are, no one would make colour photography in the age Tessar was made.
People love Tessar rightly because of the good contrast it gives to B&W photography.
Does not matter if it's not fast, B&W requires less speed than colour photography.
With a 400 ASA B&W film you can photograph with the f/3.5 Industar anytime, does not matter exposure with a good 400 ASA film (avoid cheap) you can expose for 1600 ISO and obtain acceptable results even without pushing the film. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Hummm, thanks Orio, will try it for BW pics very soon.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Katastrofo wrote: |
I like 4, 8, and
9 of this set, some great shots!
Bill |
Yes, speaking of the B&W ones, for the mood I prefer 8 and 10, but 9 is the epitome of what good B&W print should be: some full black + some full white + a large range of greys inbetween.
I think I will try a print out of this one.
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Yes, really like 9, worth hanging on a wall!
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
The 9th image has a particular balance that is beautifully rendered. The planes and corners and angles all are contributing to the balance of the composition. I personally love the muted colors, and the tonalities in black and white are intricately personified by this lens.
I am not too experienced yet, but I thought these lenses were so cheap that there must be something wrong with them. I wonder why they are so cheaply available?
Of course, I'm going to purchase one right away.
This forum is SUCH a good source, especially when I also am priveleged to view such good artistry with compositions. Amazing and beautiful, truly.
Edit: I was just now researching the lens online. Why would a seller make out-of-focus images of a lens? Is this a common practice, or just a mistake? Can the seller not see that it is out of focus?
Click here to see on Ebay _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Laurence wrote: |
I am not too experienced yet, but I thought these lenses were so cheap that there must be something wrong with them. I wonder why they are so cheaply available? |
Because people don't know them. Because people who may know them don't know of the adapters (which is what happened to me: I had manual lenses for a long time but I didn't know I could use them on the digital reflex until not too long ago). Because many people are victims of the stupid techno trend that makes them think that the latest technology is the only good technology worth having. Because many, too many people have zero aesthetical sense. Because many people don't even know what is the good or the bad to be found in a lense: why else they would hurry buying zooms, and especially wide angle zooms (the most horrible of all zooms) when the simple fact is that no one, not even Zeiss, has been able to build zooms that are perfect from one end to the other? I perfectly understand professionals that buy zooms, it's their job to perform fast and safe which is more important than quality for most clients. I would do the same. In fact, my work also involves some photographing, and for this reason I am keeping some AF lenses. But amateurs? Why the helga an amateur with no time pressure on his shoulders should buy zoom lenses, if not because they just don't know?? They can't tell the horribly distorted 28mm image taken with a 28-85 zoom, from a perfect image taken with a good 28mm prime, that's the sad fact. For them, it's enough that a picture is sharp. If it has coma in the corners, or if the buildings look like Glen Grant barrels, or if the corners have a 2 stop falloff, they just don't notice. They can't tell. They think zooms are the best lenses. Just approach any everyday person with your stuff. He/she will say "ah, this is a zoom. Ooh!" And so when they go to a shop, they ask for "a zoom". Not because it's more handy, because they think zooms are the best type of lens. This is the ignorance that is widespread.
Quote: |
Of course, I'm going to purchase one right away. |
wise move!
Quote: |
This forum is SUCH a good source, especially when I also am priveleged to view such good artistry with compositions. Amazing and beautiful, truly. |
Thanks for the kind words!
Quote: |
Edit: I was just now researching the lens online. Why would a seller make out-of-focus images of a lens? Is this a common practice, or just a mistake? Can the seller not see that it is out of focus? |
Most people just don't care, they want to put the item online fast and without losing too much time.
Some may do this for cheating, but from my experience, the large majority of sellers just don't care.
Which makes me angry and I usually don't buy, because if they don't care about presenting the item to me the buyer, I don't think they would care about making a good packaging, or helping with post office if the package gets lost, etc. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Orio
Your pictures are a perfect advertisement for the lens - we should need no other encouragement to go get it. Fortunately, I am like you, with a homage to pay to Attila for providing one to me. As for black and white - although I agree with you I found the colour saturation under sunny conditions was just perfect.
I suspect this little masterpiece will basically do whatever you ask of it.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
patrickh wrote: |
I found the colour saturation under sunny conditions was just perfect.
I suspect this little masterpiece will basically do whatever you ask of it.
patrickh |
Patrick, I took this picture in 1967 using Kodachrome II film with a little Zenit 3M and the older chrome M39 version of the Industar 3.5/50. I'm not happy with the result from my cheap scanner and I'll be making a new scan when I have the new one, but I think this perfectly backs up what you say about the colour saturation, and also shows that the contrast works as well in colour as in B&W. The lens has the other typical Tessar characteristic of being a little soft wide open but pin sharp at smaller apertures, and very smooth out of focus.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Peter
I love the laundry - you can see how clean the clothes are!
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
patrickh wrote: |
Peter
I love the laundry - you can see how clean the clothes are!
patrickh |
Hahaha, and at the tip of Portland Bill they blow dry in under 2 minutes! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Yes, this lens is a little gem. I really like my copy and I also have found it for very little money.
The only thing is that it sometimes is a little too small for me.
Very nice shots, Orio.
BTW, in your list of reasons you forgot that many people think that lenses which do not cost a fortune cannot be good! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|