View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
enigmaticz
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enigmaticz wrote:
So can anybody help a newbie out with the questions on the two lenses I posted earlier?
Sorry if this is the wrong thread, seemed to be most appropriate but looks to be more show & tell at this point than Q&A |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-99.html
N/F: Nikon F mount
Hard to tell anything from your second set of pix.The lens looks wide open.Try flicking the aperture lever on the mount as you adjust the aperture.Could be oil on the aperture blades....Or the spring is stretched,broken or not connected.
This thread is about identifying Vivitar lenses and how the lens is rated...hardly a show and tell.
You would have better luck if you made a thread specific topic about your questions. _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
enigmaticz wrote: |
So can anybody help a newbie out with the questions on the two lenses I posted earlier?
Sorry if this is the wrong thread, seemed to be most appropriate but looks to be more show & tell at this point than Q&A |
As Boomer says.
I did own the 24mm and it may just have been my copy, but it was rubbish. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enigmaticz
Joined: 05 Aug 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enigmaticz wrote:
Thanks for the pointers, I'll try to get some life out of them and come back with some contributions if possible. Hopefully there's something salvageable here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Vivitars are notorious for copy variation, I had two copies of the 28 serial 2.8/28 and one was very good, the other was a total dog, one of the worst lenses I ever owned. I also had a 2.3/135 that was garbage, while others have had great copies of that lens.
I guess the only way is to try a copy out and see how it is. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chicks
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:43 am Post subject: Auto VMC 55mm f/1.4 |
|
|
chicks wrote:
Nice list, thanks for compiling it. I've had this Auto VMC 55mm f/1.4 for a while, have found very little about it, and didn't see it on the list, so here it is:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
asharpe
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 7:00 am Post subject: An early Vivitar 21mm? |
|
|
asharpe wrote:
I have a Vivitar Auto 21mm 3.8 in T mount. Most of the sites that talk about Vivitar serial numbers say that the Tokina numbers have 9 digits. But mine has 7. It starts 37021 and then has two more digits. Is this still Tokina? Too early for the serial numbering system? It looks well used, but the glass is fine. I can upload a photograph of it if there is any interest from a historical perspective. _________________ Pentax K-3, M42: takumar 17/4, Vivitar 21/3.8, takumar 28/3.5, takumar 35/3.5, takumar 50/1.4, takumar 50/4 macro preset, jupiter-9 85/2, takumar 100/4 macro, takumar 135/3.5 preset, takumar 200/5.6 preset. A: Sigma Super Wide II 24/2.8, Pentax-A 35/2.8, Pentax-A 50/1.7, Pentax-A 200/4, Vivitar Macro TC. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1304 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:52 pm Post subject: Re: An early Vivitar 21mm? |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
asharpe wrote: |
I have a Vivitar Auto 21mm 3.8 in T mount. Most of the sites that talk about Vivitar serial numbers say that the Tokina numbers have 9 digits. But mine has 7. It starts 37021 and then has two more digits. Is this still Tokina? Too early for the serial numbering system? It looks well used, but the glass is fine. I can upload a photograph of it if there is any interest from a historical perspective. |
t-mount or T4/TX mount?? If the latter they're all tokina. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asharpe
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:29 am Post subject: Re: An early Vivitar 21mm? |
|
|
asharpe wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
asharpe wrote: |
I have a Vivitar Auto 21mm 3.8 in T mount. Most of the sites that talk about Vivitar serial numbers say that the Tokina numbers have 9 digits. But mine has 7. It starts 37021 and then has two more digits. Is this still Tokina? Too early for the serial numbering system? It looks well used, but the glass is fine. I can upload a photograph of it if there is any interest from a historical perspective. |
t-mount or T4/TX mount?? If the latter they're all tokina. |
Looks like a T4 mount, based on http://rick_oleson.tripod.com/index-99.html The inside of the mount (and the adapter, for that matter), have PATS.PEND on them. The adapter goes to M42. _________________ Pentax K-3, M42: takumar 17/4, Vivitar 21/3.8, takumar 28/3.5, takumar 35/3.5, takumar 50/1.4, takumar 50/4 macro preset, jupiter-9 85/2, takumar 100/4 macro, takumar 135/3.5 preset, takumar 200/5.6 preset. A: Sigma Super Wide II 24/2.8, Pentax-A 35/2.8, Pentax-A 50/1.7, Pentax-A 200/4, Vivitar Macro TC. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wildlight images
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 56
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wildlight images wrote:
7 digit serial numbers is common on T4/TX
Last edited by wildlight images on Fri Feb 09, 2018 3:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
wildlight images wrote: |
7 digit serial numbers is common on T4/TX, and authenicated as Tokina since they invented these ic mounts |
I have two Vivitar TX mount lenses, that I've attributed to Tokina because of the 37****** serial numbers, and the knowledge of people here on the forum. But they both have eight digit numbers.
Vivitar 200 / 3.5 and Vivitar 90-230 / 4.5 zoom. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wildlight images
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 56
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
wildlight images wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
I have two Vivitar TX mount lenses, that I've attributed to Tokina because of the 37****** serial numbers, and the knowledge of people here on the forum. But they both have eight digit numbers.
Vivitar 200 / 3.5 and Vivitar 90-230 / 4.5 zoom. |
I was not questioning anything at all, I was just commenting 7 digits is common on Vivitar T4/TX.
I have a Vivitar 35-70mm 3.5-4.5 with a 55mm filter and the lens does not show up up on any Vivitar list I can find, it is not a "28" Komine (about 3 versions), it is in the original box and coordinates with the 82-84 Vivitar era packaging scheme..... it has no special ending serial number "000" or "0003", is built like a Swiss watch (better than any 35-70 Viv I have seen, Tokina, or Cosina and even Yashica) and a very nice looking design well done, closer to leica/german styling than Japanese ...cosmetic appearance speaking, a more straighter cylindrical look ....then you read the code .."94"xxxxx, and you scratch your head and ask yourself "huh, Cosina?" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
roglebk
Joined: 13 Mar 2018 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:52 am Post subject: Vivitar 75-200mm 1:4.5 MC 42030179 ø55 (Bauer) Nikon AI |
|
|
roglebk wrote:
#1
#2
#3
_________________ Underwater and land macro fanatic.
For trade
Konica Hexanon 21mm 2.8 AR
Kiron 105mm 2.8 macro Nikon AI-s
Isco: Two Tele-Westanar 135mm 3.5, Westagon 50mm 1.9 M42
Tokina AT-X 300mm 2.8 Pro Minolta/Sony A |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 515 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
Don't know if it's of any interest to this thread, but I just received a Samyang 800mm f/8 mirror in T2 mount, which apparently was also re-badged as a Vivitar, and with it came a T2 mount 2x teleconverter which is badged "Vivitar Series 1" ... weird thing, never seen a T2 teleconverter before! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1121
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Any thoughts about panagor PMC 80-200 4.5 macro 55mm filter serial number starting 81...? I found it should be Polar maker ,but no other info at all - |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
kypfer wrote: |
Don't know if it's of any interest to this thread, but I just received a Samyang 800mm f/8 mirror in T2 mount, which apparently was also re-badged as a Vivitar, and with it came a T2 mount 2x teleconverter which is badged "Vivitar Series 1" ... weird thing, never seen a T2 teleconverter before! |
These days, "Vivitar" is just a name used for marketing purposes. Whatever the entity is that has the rights to the name in no way bears any resemblance to the Vivitar of the 60s through the 90s, where they actually designed many, if not most, of their optics. Nowadays, anything that sez "Vivitar" is just a rebadge of something else, most often Samyang.
I agree, I've never seen a T-mount teleconverter either. An easy way to make the TC a universal fit. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 902 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2019 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
kypfer wrote: |
Don't know if it's of any interest to this thread, but I just received a Samyang 800mm f/8 mirror in T2 mount, which apparently was also re-badged as a Vivitar, and with it came a T2 mount 2x teleconverter which is badged "Vivitar Series 1" ... weird thing, never seen a T2 teleconverter before! |
These days, "Vivitar" is just a name used for marketing purposes. Whatever the entity is that has the rights to the name in no way bears any resemblance to the Vivitar of the 60s through the 90s, where they actually designed many, if not most, of their optics. Nowadays, anything that sez "Vivitar" is just a rebadge of something else, most often Samyang.
I agree, I've never seen a T-mount teleconverter either. An easy way to make the TC a universal fit. |
I've got a T2 teleconverter, IIRC when I brought it, it was described as M42, but perhaps I confusing it with many of the other T2 bits that have be mis-named. I'm not sure why I wanted it in either case, my M42 & T2 lenses are generally not sharp enough to work well with a TC. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Looking through some of the odd lenses I've picked up in "box of old camera stuff" deals, I found this one, the Tele Vivitar 135 3.5:
It's got some interesting features - preset aperture, obviously, some sort of T-mount adapter to M42, a 46mm filter thread, and 15 aperture blades...
It's pretty good...decently sharp with nice "cotton candy" bokeh. The only 135 I've seen that's smaller is the Voigtlander Super-Dynarex, but that one doesn't have it's own aperture mechanism. This Vivitar is a bit on the heavy side though. Looks like 4-elements, and I think the second one is quite a hefty piece of glass. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 16, 2019 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Reminds me of Komura in its appearance.
Glad you like it
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2019 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
KEO wrote: |
Looking through some of the odd lenses I've picked up in "box of old camera stuff" deals, I found this one, the Tele Vivitar 135 3.5:
It's got some interesting features - preset aperture, obviously, some sort of T-mount adapter to M42, a 46mm filter thread, and 15 aperture blades...
It's pretty good...decently sharp with nice "cotton candy" bokeh. The only 135 I've seen that's smaller is the Voigtlander Super-Dynarex, but that one doesn't have it's own aperture mechanism. This Vivitar is a bit on the heavy side though. Looks like 4-elements, and I think the second one is quite a hefty piece of glass. |
I have a Vivitar 85mm f/1.8 looking like this one, with Tele Vivitar engraved in lens front and with serial number similar to your 135mm f/3.5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 761 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Reminds me of Komura in its appearance.
Glad you like it
Tom |
Thanks, I'll research Komura a bit.
The build quality is quite good. It's a very solid lens - even the anodized metal feels high quality.
It's certainly seen some rough treatment though. Luckily the dings on the rim of the filter thread are not enough to negatively affect lens hoods or filters.
The worst thing is that the elements have - or had, in most cases - some sort of grimy film on them. I suspect a previous owner may have been a heavy smoker or something. The grime reminds me of the greasy film that coats the inside of windshields on cars that have been out in the sun a lot. That stuff comes from vapors that rise from plastic dashboards when they heat up. It's invisible most of the time, but in direct light it becomes visible as a bright white milkiness, and it takes a lot of hard scrubbing to get it off. It smears instead of washing away.
It took me about 45 minutes to clear the tiny rear element, and even then I didn't quite get all of it, though I will with subsequent cleanings.
EDIT: Yes, it looks a lot like the Komura. I wonder whether it's the same lens, since this Vivitar version sells for peanuts on ebay.
vivaldibow wrote: |
I have a Vivitar 85mm f/1.8 looking like this one, with Tele Vivitar engraved in lens front and with serial number similar to your 135mm f/3.5. |
Do you like it? I'd be willing to give something like that a try if I found one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Jul 21, 2019 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
KEO wrote: |
vivaldibow wrote: |
I have a Vivitar 85mm f/1.8 looking like this one, with Tele Vivitar engraved in lens front and with serial number similar to your 135mm f/3.5. |
Do you like it? I'd be willing to give something like that a try if I found one. |
I like it. If you search it, I have a thread here showing some of the sample photos. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|