View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 11:44 am Post subject: Identify lens 28 2.8 |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
Hi all,
have this lens with the best possible Brand name => "Info" !
Could this be a Soligor or Tokina made lens ?
Very much Takumar quality and feel and quite good performance - in the range of ML 28.
Thanx
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2494
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
28mm 2.8 is probably the most common third party lens. This looks like it might be Tokina, but these Japanese companies often cloned stuff so it could also be another manufacturer. (Soligor didn't make lenses they just sold them). _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
I remember seeing the fonts on the lens front before, on another rebranded lens, but just can't recall which brand. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I think I have that lens as a Miranda Auto MC, the 55mm filter ring and style is the same, but I can't find it at the moment. it's not a bad lens, but I've got better so it's probably in my boxes of stuff for sale. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 631 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
The lens is a Makinon, shown by the 5-10 maximum reading before infinity on the focus scale, and the position of the IR mark on the depth of focus scale. I haven't seen it in that body before though, it was usually sold with a rubber focus grip, under brands like Focal and Hanimex, when not branded as Makinon. It is one of Makinons' better lenses from that period, and can give decent results for a low priced lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
The DOF scale looks like my Chinon 35/2.8
http://forum.mflenses.com/auto-chinon-35mm-f2-8-tomioka-t48408.html
_________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Alun Thomas wrote: |
The lens is a Makinon, shown by the 5-10 maximum reading before infinity on the focus scale, and the position of the IR mark on the depth of focus scale. I haven't seen it in that body before though, it was usually sold with a rubber focus grip, under brands like Focal and Hanimex, when not branded as Makinon. It is one of Makinons' better lenses from that period, and can give decent results for a low priced lens. |
+1
Usually greenish coating. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
Hi all ,
Yes thats true, not Soligor but I meant Komine .
So it looks like it's a Makinon - i thought that Makinon was just re-branding lenses ..
I was curios about the possible origin as I would not expect solid metal made lens (aka Takumar) for a cheap re-branded "Info" lens. And all together as a solid performer too.
This lens could be a keeper, anyway it looks like its on the top of my 28 / M42's for now.
and thanx for reply's ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
Forgot to comment about the coating:
It looks more neutral to me, if that could be called greenish then ok.
Greenish coating I would use as description of the colour for old Fujinon's . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2494
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
This is the Makinon: http://m42lens.com/m42-lens-database/177-makinon-auto-multi-coated-28mm-f-2-8-16 It has a 52mm filter but this is probably an older verison. The green coatings are seen in the later lenses in the eighties. I suspect they were more for marketing than effectiveness :p _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10541 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
http://forum.mflenses.com/soligor-12-8-f28mm-21and-versions-t30866.html _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
well yes, I have seen this pic and thats why I thought about Soligor,
however there are some differences (looking at 2nd lens that is almost as the same)
as mine is auto,
nose of the lens is straight,
and the barrel could be few mm shorter ..
but basically look-a-like 2nd Soligor lens.
(* .. getting slowly in the twilight-zone of the lens recognition ..*) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jmkmva
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 Posts: 78 Location: MidAtlantic US
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jmkmva wrote:
Alex,
The Expert lens certainly has the look of a 1960s Japanese manufactured lens. I cannot determine from the photographs, but does the Expert have an A/M switch or similar feature to close the aperture while mounted on the camera.
This was an important feature in the day for automatic M42 lenses On cameras without sufficient internal aperture controls. Also M 42 mount lenses were even then easily adaptable to other cameras such as Canon R, FL and FD, Minolta SR and others and would need external control.
If not, is it evidence of “value engineering”? Value usually for the Seller/Manufacturer
Switching topics, I cannot remember a Soligor Automatic M42 lens without an A/M Switch?
Good luck with your search. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jmkmva
Joined: 25 Nov 2010 Posts: 78 Location: MidAtlantic US
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jmkmva wrote:
Alex,
The Expert lens certainly has the look of a 1960s Japanese manufactured lens. I cannot determine from the photographs, but does the Expert have an A/M switch or similar feature to close the aperture while mounted on the camera.
This was an important feature in the day for automatic M42 lenses On cameras without sufficient internal aperture controls. Also M 42 mount lenses were even then easily adaptable to other cameras such as Canon R, FL and FD, Minolta SR and others and would need external control.
If not, is it evidence of “value engineering”? Value usually for the Seller/Manufacturer
Switching topics, I cannot remember a Soligor Automatic M42 lens without an A/M Switch?
Good luck with your search. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2929 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
How does "shown by the 5-10 maximum reading before infinity on the focus scale" indicate Makinon? _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 631 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
The '5-10' marking is unusual, not used for any other 28mm lens I know of. I've owned numerous copies marked Focal, Hanimex, and others. They were all optically identical as I found by disassembly.
Most 28mm lenses seem to use a 3-10 or 10-30 scale, and occasionally 4-12 or 2-7, with numerous other variants also seen. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3669 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Alun Thomas wrote: |
The '5-10' marking is unusual, not used for any other 28mm lens I know of. I've owned numerous copies marked Focal, Hanimex, and others. They were all optically identical as I found by disassembly.
Most 28mm lenses seem to use a 3-10 or 10-30 scale, and occasionally 4-12 or 2-7, with numerous other variants also seen. |
It's not a reliable method to deduce manufacturers, they choose the numbers based on how aggressively the helicoid moves the optics, on my shortest throw 28mm, X-Fujinon 28/1.9 EBC, the numbers on the Meter scale go from 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, 3, infinity.
(Edit)Never mind my examples below, I just noticed yours was feet and mine meters. But my X-Fujinon is 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 10, infinity in feet.
I have 2 with 5-10-infinity, my Soligor Preset
And my Konica preset
_________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2494
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Komine also uses 5 10 on the focussing scale. My Panagor 28mm 2.8 and Vivitar Close focussing 28mm 2.0 have it.
Panagor:
Panagor PMC auto- wide-angle F=28mm 1:2.8 by The lens profile, on Flickr
Vivitar version of same lens:
img_6606 by Steve Rainwater, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
Thanx all for the input ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2929 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
As with most of these secondary market lenses from Japan during that era it is really hard to say for sure. If I were guessing, and it would be just a guess, I would guess Tomioka, Only because I have seen similar livery on clearly labelled Tominons. Though not on a 28.2.8. The chinon (tomioka) shown by lightshow is very distinctive and that pattern with the 2 bright lines separated by pebble grain leather with orange distance markings I am 90 percent certain are ALL tomioka. I have challenged folks here to show me an example clearly made by another manufacturer. So far nothing. But I will add I read somewhere (probably on here) that the lens industry bought components from each other and did spec manufacturing for each other. So it becomes exceedingly difficult to define the makers of a large proportion of these lenses. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2020 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
As with most of these secondary market lenses from Japan during that era it is really hard to say for sure. If I were guessing, and it would be just a guess, I would guess Tomioka, Only because I have seen similar livery on clearly labelled Tominons. Though not on a 28.2.8. The chinon (tomioka) shown by lightshow is very distinctive and that pattern with the 2 bright lines separated by pebble grain leather with orange distance markings I am 90 percent certain are ALL tomioka. I have challenged folks here to show me an example clearly made by another manufacturer. So far nothing. But I will add I read somewhere (probably on here) that the lens industry bought components from each other and did spec manufacturing for each other. So it becomes exceedingly difficult to define the makers of a large proportion of these lenses. |
Thanx ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vivaldibow
Joined: 23 Jun 2018 Posts: 837
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2020 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
vivaldibow wrote:
I vote for Makinon as the font on the nameplate ring is more like the square shaped, typically seen on Makinon lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
thanx for your vote ( .. sounds so funny now in these times ..)
As far as I know Makinons are not really something to be proud of ... but when a good performer - i dont care about the name / brand / posh factor / $ / ...
sears & auto rikenon look bloody similar too |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karthikrr
Joined: 04 Jun 2019 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2020 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karthikrr wrote:
I have this lens, recent acquisition in a box of "defective" lenses. It seems to be perfectly okay except for a dented filter ring. Haven't shot with it, but this thread makes me want to go test it out! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 631 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
As with most of these secondary market lenses from Japan during that era it is really hard to say for sure. If I were guessing, and it would be just a guess, I would guess Tomioka, Only because I have seen similar livery on clearly labelled Tominons. Though not on a 28.2.8. The chinon (tomioka) shown by lightshow is very distinctive and that pattern with the 2 bright lines separated by pebble grain leather with orange distance markings I am 90 percent certain are ALL tomioka. I have challenged folks here to show me an example clearly made by another manufacturer. So far nothing. But I will add I read somewhere (probably on here) that the lens industry bought components from each other and did spec manufacturing for each other. So it becomes exceedingly difficult to define the makers of a large proportion of these lenses. |
#1
#2
#3
That Chinon 35mm lens also appeared in a large variety of other liveries, so it's maybe not advisabl to use the focus grip design alone to determine the manufacturer. For these examples the commonality can be seen through the depth of focus scale, focus markings, and the design of the rear element holder. The Tamron name on one lens confusingly may not necessarily point ot Tamron as the manufacturer. The '7' serial on the Soligor may point toward one of the manufacturers comprising Sun Optical at that point, although serial lists on the internet can often be inaccurate. Bottom line, Tomioka is not ruled out, but using just one design element to identify manufacturer may not lead to meaningful conclusions.
A further example is the 28mm lenses from the same manufacturer, in an even wider array of liveries:
#1
#2
#3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|