| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tobenama
Joined: 01 May 2015 Posts: 6 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 11:54 am Post subject: Help fixing Minolta MD Zoom 35-70 mm F3.5 Macro lens |
|
|
tobenama wrote:
I have a Minolta MD Zoom 35-70 mm F3.5 Macro lens the aperture ring of which does not have clicks. Otherwise it works correctly, i.e. the aperture can be opened and closed, but without the clicks it does not stay where I put it if I focus or zoom. I have looked inside the lens by taking the back part off, but could not find anything that could be of help. Searching the net I found only one Japanese guide (http://minolta.eazypix.de/lr/z35-70_3,5_md3/nmd_zoom35_70.html) for this lens, but it is of no help to me fixing the aperture clicks. Sending the lens for repairs would cost more than buying a new lens. I guess the fix is easy once you know what to do and I have the tools to take the backside of the lens (where the aperture ring is) apart. Anyone with a clue how to fix the lens? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dan_
 Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1052 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
If you take off the MD mount and the diaphragm ring you'll notice that in the part of the lens body covered by the diaphragm ring is a very little circular hole. Inside this hole should be placed a little spring and a little metal ball and on the diaphragm ring should be some little vertical grooves - that is the part that makes the diaphragm to click when the ball passes through the grooves.
Most probably the ball and/or the spring got lost somehow when your lens was opened sometime before or the previous owner took them off on purpose to better use the lens for videos.
To fix that you should find a replacement ball (and spring, if necessary). You can take it from another lens or try to buy a new one - I've seen them for sale from time to time on ebay.
I had the same problem with my 35-70 MD and managed to replace the little ball with one taken from a crappy 50mm f/1.7 MD.
Last edited by dan_ on Fri May 01, 2015 2:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobenama
Joined: 01 May 2015 Posts: 6 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobenama wrote:
Yes, now I can see where the ball should probably go. So all I need is a spring and that little ball dropped into that hole? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dan_
 Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1052 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobenama
Joined: 01 May 2015 Posts: 6 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobenama wrote:
Oh well, I opened up a beaten up 135 mm F3.5 lens and I tried to be as careful as I can be, but the ball and the spring was gone the moment I peeked inside. I only heard a ping from a nearby metal shelf where the ball probably hit. I could not find either, as there is lots of stuff there. I don't have more lenses that are worth cannibalising, so I guess the 35-70 has to be without clicks for now.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobenama
Joined: 01 May 2015 Posts: 6 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobenama wrote:
I guess I could buy a "for parts" lens somebody has for really cheap and take the ball and the spring from there, that time being more careful (doing it maybe inside a clear plastic bag). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
miran
 Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1367 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
You're not first who had that happen to them.  _________________ my flickr stream |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobenama
Joined: 01 May 2015 Posts: 6 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobenama wrote:
I had my Minolta MD W.Rokkor-HH 35 mm F1.8 (the first all-metal version) fixed and cleaned up by a professional, who warned me about this spring and ball if I try to do it myself. He fixed the lens the aperture ring of which was not working at all and when I got the lens back, it was just like brand new lens, even though it's I think from the late 1960's. And excellent photographs too, I simply love the lens. The guy who fixed the lens said that come back in 40 years and the lens will go on being a gem. I'm not sure if the newer versions are better or worse, but at least mine is very, very good, the only downside being the weight. I'm not sure if I should try to find a later version of the same lens, but to me the pictures look as good if not better than the ones from the very expensive Sony Zeiss FE 35 mm F1.4 lens recently released. And they don't use automatic transmission on car races, do they, so manual focus feels like a sport, automatic focus feels like a click. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eddieitman
 Joined: 12 Apr 2011 Posts: 1248 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eddieitman wrote:
If you need a replacement ballbearing destroy a pen like a bic _________________ My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tobenama
Joined: 01 May 2015 Posts: 6 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tobenama wrote:
| eddieitman wrote: |
| If you need a replacement ballbearing destroy a pen like a bic |
Destroying a pen would be easy, but from where can I get a spring that small? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VLR
 Joined: 05 Mar 2015 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VLR wrote:
Balls from ballpoints don't work in my experience, as they are between 0.9 and 1.05 mm in diameter. In my 50 mm Minolta MD, these gut stuck in the largest slit at f/16. The slits seem to be about 0.5 mm deep, so balls with less than 1.1 mm diameter just won't slide out. I then tried one with 1.3 mm, but that was way too tight. In the end, I got some 1.2 mm hardened steel bearing balls, which do work. Ironically, you don't even need the spring with the 1.2 mm, because they seem to be sligthly larger than the originals and therefore do not slip into the springs small bore. I guess the correct size will probably be 1.1 or 1.15 mm  _________________ http://vintagelensreviews.com/
Reviews of vintage Minolta SR mount lenses and more |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloydy
 Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7768 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I have used the spring from a disposable cigarette lighter, under the flint. I stretched it which decreased the diameter and cut a bit off with pliers.
My supply of balls comes from an old Canon FD Breechlock mount, there's a lot in there. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mowgli
Joined: 01 Oct 2014 Posts: 2 Location: Birmingham, UK.
|
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 9:14 am Post subject: Re: Help fixing Minolta MD Zoom 35-70 mm F3.5 Macro lens |
|
|
mowgli wrote:
| tobenama wrote: |
| I have a Minolta MD Zoom 35-70 mm F3.5 Macro lens the aperture ring of which does not have clicks. Otherwise it works correctly, i.e. the aperture can be opened and closed, but without the clicks it does not stay where I put it if I focus or zoom. I have looked inside the lens by taking the back part off, but could not find anything that could be of help. Searching the net I found only one Japanese guide (http://minolta.eazypix.de/lr/z35-70_3,5_md3/nmd_zoom35_70.html) for this lens, but it is of no help to me fixing the aperture clicks. Sending the lens for repairs would cost more than buying a new lens. I guess the fix is easy once you know what to do and I have the tools to take the backside of the lens (where the aperture ring is) apart. Anyone with a clue how to fix the lens? |
I have several Minolta MD Zoom 35-70mm F3.5 Macro lenses. Other replies are quite correct in saying the small ball bearing is missing. It is very easy for it to ping out. I have lost two - even though I took precautions! What you need is a 1.19mm ball which is the same as a 3/64 inch ball. You can buy a pack of 10 from http://simplybearings.co.uk/shop/Loose+Balls+&+Rollers-All+Hardened+Steel+Ball+Bearings/c23_5005/index.html in the UK. If the small spring is missing (which is less likely) you need a 1mm O/D spring. You can buy a pack of 20 from http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/131353754666 These are a bit long. You will need to cut one down so that it pokes out of its hole by about 0.5mm. Incidentally, I have successfully converted the said Minolta lens to fit my Canon 40D using a M39 to EOS adapter as the basis. You do need a lathe to do it, and there is confusion on the web regarding the Minolta and Canon register distances. I think the correct figures are: Minolta 43.73mm and the Canon is 44.14mm. _________________ I'm interested in classic film cameras, particularly the Minolta X300. I have repaired several mainly by replacing the electrolytic capacitors.
I have designed and made special adapters to allow Minolta 35-70 f3.5, 28mm f2.5 and 50mm f2 PF lenses to fit on a Canon 40D camera. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|