| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 2155
Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:50 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Schnauzer wrote:
I have got nice pictures from Superia 200, X-TRA 400,Kodak gold and ultra max 400 when I was close but terrible colors when the distance was great. Kind of muddy colors. Kodak Ektar 100, Portra 160NC ,400NC, Fuji 160s and Reala 100 worked great at all distances.
I had several rolls of film ruined by a local lab in the last few years. Until I realized it was them I thought it was something I did. I don't go there any more. I would try some place else for the next roll.
I ran your picture through PS5 to find the white, black and neutral points and this is what I got. Is this closer?
_________________
Ron |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 476
Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
Thanks, a lot. Yes, that's much better. I didn't think of film as requiring lots of post-process  And I'll follow your advice regarding labs
_________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| ylyad wrote: |
| I didn't think of film as requiring lots of post-process |
Just same than digital, if everything not require any post process,if something went wrong and you try to save image have to work on it.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 476
Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
Got my scanner yesterday (Epson v330 photo, I will give more detailed feedback later but I'm very positively satisfied), passed the same roll in it, here are the results on the same shots as above:
These are straight out of the scanner, and clearly better than the one scanned at the lab!
_________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I guess this is exactly what you did see with your eyes, looks nice!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
