| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
parabellumfoto
 Joined: 06 Apr 2013 Posts: 413 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
parabellumfoto wrote:
| Olivier wrote: |
"cigarette ash on micro-fibre pec pad"
I think you can try it, but won't remove scratches completely, I'm afraid.
Else, what method did you use when your tried to remove haze from your lens ? |
First was rubbing alcohol. That didn't work so I moved onto toothpaste, which didn't work, then petrol, then some heavy duty windscreen bug remover for cars.
The bug remover was what scratched the glass.
I will try cigarette ash.
Do I rub it on dry? Or with water?
Other internal elements have haze as well. This lens was caked in concrete and sand when I got it. It was sitting in the previous owner's garage cooking in Sydney's hot summers. That's why the coatings have been damaged. _________________ Minolta MC Rokkor f1.4 50mm
Minolta MD Zoom Macro 35-105mm f3.5-4.5
Nikon Nikkor 50mm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-S Auto 5cm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-Q Auto 135mm F2.8
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm F1.8G
http://www.parabellumfoto.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivier
 Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5127 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
I would say dry. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
parabellumfoto
 Joined: 06 Apr 2013 Posts: 413 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
parabellumfoto wrote:
| Olivier wrote: |
| I would say dry. |
Thanks Oliver _________________ Minolta MC Rokkor f1.4 50mm
Minolta MD Zoom Macro 35-105mm f3.5-4.5
Nikon Nikkor 50mm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-S Auto 5cm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-Q Auto 135mm F2.8
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm F1.8G
http://www.parabellumfoto.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
parabellumfoto
 Joined: 06 Apr 2013 Posts: 413 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
parabellumfoto wrote:
| parabellumfoto wrote: |
| Olivier wrote: |
"cigarette ash on micro-fibre pec pad"
I think you can try it, but won't remove scratches completely, I'm afraid.
Else, what method did you use when your tried to remove haze from your lens ? |
First was rubbing alcohol. That didn't work so I moved onto toothpaste, which didn't work, then petrol, then some heavy duty windscreen bug remover for cars.
The bug remover was what scratched the glass.
I will try cigarette ash.
Do I rub it on dry? Or with water?
Other internal elements have haze as well. This lens was caked in concrete and sand when I got it. It was sitting in the previous owner's garage cooking in Sydney's hot summers. That's why the coatings have been damaged. |
OK, I used dry ash from burnt incense sticks. In removing the scratches that I created it worked very well. As for the original haze, no effect. _________________ Minolta MC Rokkor f1.4 50mm
Minolta MD Zoom Macro 35-105mm f3.5-4.5
Nikon Nikkor 50mm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-S Auto 5cm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-Q Auto 135mm F2.8
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm F1.8G
http://www.parabellumfoto.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SXR_Mark
 Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
| guardian wrote: |
Hydrofluoric acid will remove coatings without harming glass. |
Actually, hydrofluoric acid does dissolve glass. It is also very, very nasty stuff. Personally, I wouldn't want to go anywhere near it. (Though I've known geologists who use it regularly and are considerably more blasé about it).
It is my understanding that early (single layer) AR coatings were made from magnesium fluoride. It occurs to me that such a coating is probably not going to be removed by HF anyway.
Mark _________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnBar
 Joined: 21 Jun 2012 Posts: 581 Location: Liverpool
|
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JohnBar wrote:
I use AUTOSOL a chrome polish. Apply with cotton bud when cream state - leave to dry and work the fine particulate with a clean bud. It takes ages - be prepared
It requires many treatments to get down to the base layer of the coating where all the Haze seems to live _________________ Rectilux 3FF Series single focus anamorphic attachments
http://www.transferconvert.co.uk/cinemania/rectilux-3ff.html
Regular News on https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rectilux/704770636267200 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZoneV
 Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1648 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
I have tested polishing with a drill, a sisal polishing weel and a paste for car glass polishing.
With this setup I could polish lens scratches away.
But there is the big danger to alter the lens surface. I think this could be used to to remove firm haze or permanent fungus defects, which can not be cleaned away with other methodes. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnBar
 Joined: 21 Jun 2012 Posts: 581 Location: Liverpool
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
JohnBar wrote:
| ZoneV wrote: |
I have tested polishing with a drill, a sisal polishing weel and a paste for car glass polishing.
With this setup I could polish lens scratches away.
But there is the big danger to alter the lens surface. I think this could be used to to remove firm haze or permanent fungus defects, which can not be cleaned away with other methodes. |
What speed/rpm do you use? _________________ Rectilux 3FF Series single focus anamorphic attachments
http://www.transferconvert.co.uk/cinemania/rectilux-3ff.html
Regular News on https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rectilux/704770636267200 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZoneV
 Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1648 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
About 2000-3000 rpm.
Dependent on coating hardness it takes only few minutes to take the hole coating away.
With that modern hard coating on the Sigma lens it takes me probably (estimated) 15 minutes to get most of the scratches away. I was not able to photograph the small rest of the scratch, but with close inspection it is still visible. But much much less than before the polishing. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gill
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 44 Location: Lahore
|
Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 3:24 pm Post subject: Haze |
|
|
gill wrote:
Why not try in a spectacle store ? advised by Olivier.
I located a technician here who said "can replace the back element of Nikon 20/3.5 of same number of third party. Another technician said can polish the lens but cannot gurantee of its performance. I am seeking advise from my colleagues "After polish the performance of lens will equal to own Nikon or likely to decrease or total collapse. Secondly is it possible the third party back element of same number will perform equal or less to Nikon?. Any help in this respect will be appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10362 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 8:49 pm Post subject: Re: Haze |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| gill wrote: |
Why not try in a spectacle store ? advised by Olivier.
I located a technician here who said "can replace the back element of Nikon 20/3.5 of same number of third party. Another technician said can polish the lens but cannot gurantee of its performance. I am seeking advise from my colleagues "After polish the performance of lens will equal to own Nikon or likely to decrease or total collapse. Secondly is it possible the third party back element of same number will perform equal or less to Nikon?. Any help in this respect will be appreciated. |
Opticians are used to off-the-shelf parts. Trouble is to find a replacement element having identical curvatures. These are (typically) NOT off-the-shelf parts sold by optical companies for custom optical solutions -- camera lenses have special dimensions. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200
Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300
Macro-Takumar 1:4/50
Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm
Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element),
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100
Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
Other lenses:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZoneV
 Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1648 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
+1
I think they would very unlikely find a replacement with same front and back curvature and same material! Other material gives other (color) dispersion. So optical correction is away.
Polishing ruins surface accuracy - but from my experience this is at least sometimes less a problem. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gill
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 44 Location: Lahore
|
Posted: Sun Aug 18, 2013 4:00 am Post subject: Haze |
|
|
gill wrote:
Zonev wrote
| Quote: |
| but from my experience this is at least sometimes less a problem. |
Thanks for the quick response Visualopsins and Zonev. Will you elabroate i.e the lenes performance will be better. On the haze side photos are white/foggy. Will the polish remove the haze/fog and picture will be sharp. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZoneV
 Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1648 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Sat Aug 24, 2013 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: Haze |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
| gill wrote: |
Zonev wrote
| Quote: |
| but from my experience this is at least sometimes less a problem. |
Thanks for the quick response Visualopsins and Zonev. Will you elabroate i.e the lenes performance will be better. On the haze side photos are white/foggy. Will the polish remove the haze/fog and picture will be sharp. |
Polish will most likely destroy lens surface form quality, and probably even lens surface smoothness. This could result in problems.
And in case the surface very bad now, it will need a very "deep" polishing process, with high risk of loosing image quality. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GP
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
GP wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
Recently I had 6.3/400 wundertube with leftover haze in threads pattern, from fungus infection. No solvents could remove it, so I polished the haze away using cigarette ash on micro-fibre pec pad. Either the element was not coated or there was no damage to the coating from the polishing, because the element looks brand new now. I was surprised! Lens IQ improved dramatically, gaining contrast & clarity & brightness.
I also just cleaned some haze from rear elements of mirror lens, with same dramatic improvements in IQ. I think I'm going to keep it now! |
What is the active ingredient in ash? Is it not something similar to soap? (Very vague and possibly incorrect primary school memory.  _________________ Playing with digital cameras is fun.
When I get serious, I reach for one of my film cameras... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10362 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| GP wrote: |
| visualopsins wrote: |
Recently I had 6.3/400 wundertube with leftover haze in threads pattern, from fungus infection. No solvents could remove it, so I polished the haze away using cigarette ash on micro-fibre pec pad. Either the element was not coated or there was no damage to the coating from the polishing, because the element looks brand new now. I was surprised! Lens IQ improved dramatically, gaining contrast & clarity & brightness.
I also just cleaned some haze from rear elements of mirror lens, with same dramatic improvements in IQ. I think I'm going to keep it now! |
What is the active ingredient in ash? Is it not something similar to soap? (Very vague and possibly incorrect primary school memory.  |
Carbon! The fine particles are a minor abrasive. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200
Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300
Macro-Takumar 1:4/50
Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm
Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element),
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100
Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
Other lenses:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gill
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 44 Location: Lahore
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:48 am Post subject: Re: Haze |
|
|
gill wrote:
| ZoneV wrote: |
| Polish will most likely destroy lens surface form quality, and probably even lens surface smoothness. This could result in problems. And in case the surface very bad now, it will need a very "deep" polishing process, with high risk of loosing image quality. |
Same here. The optical co. returned the lens with the remarks" Its back elements are pasted in a frame and if removed chances of breakage. Perhaps they do not have proper machine/tools so locate other ways or will rest on shelf as in the past. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GP
Joined: 12 Jul 2013 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GP wrote:
| Quote: |
What is the active ingredient in ash? Is it not something similar to soap? (Very vague and possibly incorrect primary school memory.
Carbon! The fine particles are a minor abrasive. |
I will try it, thanks. (Have to find a heavy smoker.. )
I was hoping for a chemical solution, but looks like there is no escape from actually grinding the surface one way or another.
(Similar to other people's experiences, none of the solvents I've tried worked either.) _________________ Playing with digital cameras is fun.
When I get serious, I reach for one of my film cameras... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|