View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Fabian
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 254
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fabian wrote:
I thought you were hinting at West Germany, but maybe I read wrong.
Cheap c-mount tv lens: China. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Bingo, Fabian! It's Fujian CCTV 35mm 1.7. Did it look a bit like that from the beginning?
In about 20 hours I will post, as promised, two shots, wide open and stopped down. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
And all the players, sorry if I misled you with my hints. I did not mean to direct you to West Germany instead of East Germany. It could be a serious political mistake from my part! I meant it was not Germany at all.
It was a genuine pleasure. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 3:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
You are right saying an original could help. But the forum takes only 1600px at the long side. And the original is 4912px wide. Where may I put it? I have no flickr account.
|
To clarify, I was asking for an unprocessed image, not for the original full size image. One problem with processed images is that results can be made to look similar. Of course, one problem is that each camera processes images differently too, but one problem at a time.
I have the Fujian (Michael version), but I wouldn't have thought about it.
Here are a couple of wide open samples:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/6847409804
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/6986288715
This one is taken at f/2.8 and shows the result of the image circle being designed for a small sensor:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/6844410746 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Ha, ha i was only 5mm away with 30mm Pentacon. It has very similar bokeh and distinctive edge rendering. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1827 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
ah Vault-Tech
Another big Fallout fan like me ? _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Hello to all,
sorry for make you waiting. It took me more time than 20 hours to get to my shots.
Laurentiu Cristofor, it seems you have another version of Fujian. Yours gives an explicitly circular image, as you say: clear in the center and swirly blurred around. The mine does not lack that. But it is more unevenly distributed. As I said, the lens may give a blurry spot not far from the center, and then a clearer and better focused further away. Someone in the forums said it gives a partial effect of a tilt lens. Even if I have none, I saw some image samples, and I find it in a way similar.
Arkku, you asked me for two samples of one shot, wide open and stopped down to f5.6. Here they are. With an exception that the second one is stopped down rather to 8-11 (my lens have no clear mark, so I can only know an approximate aperture value):
This is a shot with the aperture wide open. Slightly sharpened after size reduction to 1600px, otherwise no post-procession.
You may look at the original out-of-camera image here.
This shot is with the lens stopped down to f8-f11. Also slightly sharpened after size reduction to 1600px, otherwise no post-procession.
Here is the out-of-camera original.
Do you notice that irregular sharpness all through the view field at the first picture and even slight effects of it in the second? Weird and interesting, isn't it?
alex ph |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
std wrote: |
ah Vault-Tech
Another big Fallout fan like me ? |
I guess so.
alex ph wrote: |
Laurentiu Cristofor, it seems you have another version of Fujian. Yours gives an explicitly circular image, as you say: clear in the center and swirly blurred around. The mine does not lack that. But it is more unevenly distributed. As I said, the lens may give a blurry spot not far from the center, and then a clearer and better focused further away. Someone in the forums said it gives a partial effect of a tilt lens. Even if I have none, I saw some image samples, and I find it in a way similar.
|
They are the same lens. It has a strong field curvature which becomes very obvious on large sensors. Try shooting something flat at different apertures and you'll obtain the same effect. In other situations the field curvature can produce effects as if from a toy lens or a tilted lens.
[EDIT] Here's a great demo of the field curvature of the lens. First shot demonstrates the same result I got in my third shot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Laurentiu Cristofor, I agree with you. The curved, circular effect is quite visible. What I mean is the fact that it seems more explicit in your and some other cases. And in my case it gives a slightly less visible swirl.
But what I wanted to underline even more is another strange effect of this lens. It is an irregular distribution of sharpness, as far as I may see. I mean an uneven distribution of sharpness at different distance from the center. To illustrate that, I made a photo of a plane object. And underlined several spots which have different sharpness:
Here you may see the original size and unprocessed image.
And here is the out-of-camera original jpeg.
What do you think about that?
The shot is always made with Sony Nex-5n, at ISO 800, 1/40 sec. Not a beauty, and could give probably a better result at ISO 100, 1/1000 sec. Still quite similar to what I usually have from that lens. The distance to the object plane was around 60-70cm.
Last edited by alex ph on Thu May 23, 2013 8:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 2877
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Yes, Fujians have very strong field curvature. Here's what my Fujian 25 1.4 did from a perfectly straight wall (wide open test shot):
This looks horrible of course, but it's a fun little lens for little money, just treat it as super-Holga. Here's another wide open shot.
_________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Great tornado! Is it with NEX or 4/3? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 2877
|
Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
This was with m4/3, I think 25mm vignettes on NEX. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
What do you think about that?
|
Your subject is not flat, so it is hard to say whether you see differences in sharpness or just how the paper surface waves in and out of the focal plane (sphere is perhaps more appropriate here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Fri May 24, 2013 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
OK, later I will redo the test with a flat object with clear lines in a sunny day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1571
|
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Hi folks, I'm turning back to the topic in order to post another couple of shots. The idea I have is to show that Fujian gives not only a clear field curvature, but also a non-linear (non-circular) distribution of focus sharpness over the field. Previously, I made a shot of an old blanket to show that. But some persons justly noted that it was not perfectly plane to estimate the effect. More to that, the shot was made under a poor light condition.
It took me time to make another shot under a better natural light, of a plane surface with a regular, geometric design. As far as I can see, the effect I talk about remains on both shots, one made wide open, another with aperture at around F4-5.6.
Here are the shots:
1. @F1.7, out-of-camera jpg, resized, unprocessed. And here is the original where you may see it better.
2. @ F4-5.6 out-of-camera jpg, resized, unprocessed. And here is the full-sized original.
What I would like to outline is that in both cases you may observe some better focused spots further from the picture center than some worse focused spots. Just like in the shot of a blanket (a few posts upper in this thread) where I pointed out those spots with circles of different colors. Do you see the same thing, am I right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|