| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 1:44 pm Post subject: fungus does coating damage? |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
there is a lens I wanted to buy, but it has fungus on the rear lens. I have never had this kind of fungus with a redish area and a black point at it's core before. I suppose that it destroyed the coating and therefore cannot simply be cleaned off.
but because I never have had this kind of fault before I came here to ask:
has this fungus destroyed two points of the coating, and therefore it cannot simply be cleaned, and the lens better be avoided?
or do you think it still can be cleaned off, without having to expect deterioration of performance?
please have a look:
original size
somewhat enlarged
thank you for any opinion, cheers, andreas _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guardian
 Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1747
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
I can only offer you my opinion. It's free and worth every penny!
I would not be too put off by that fungus provided:
1. The lens is being sold at a very good price which takes fully into consideration its condition
2. You have capability to disassemble the lens, attack the fungus, and reassemble the lens
3. You are willing to live with a lens which might turn out wholly usable, but not pristine
Even as is that lens likely will take a good picture. Cleaned up it might be slightly better. Depending on price, I certainly think you should give that lens a shot if it's one you want. Minor flaws in the coating will be undetectable in photos. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pontus
 Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1481 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
That is a huge rear element! _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Langstrum
 Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
I'm with guardian, if the price is good, the lens has good reputation, then the fungus is not a real problem, even if they ate some of the coating layer.
I cleaned several fungus lenses and I had one was almost like yours. There wasn't any noticeable effect on the image, except one case I saw a transparent purple dot appeared with HDR shot because the coating at that point was lost on the front glass.
Recently I got a FD 50mm f/1.4 S.S.C for just $15 because the owner sold it "as is". Its glasses were full of fungus, but after cleaning, this lens became really good. So, don't miss your chance. _________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mo
 Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 9029 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I am thinking it may be a particle/oil perhaps with fungus growing on it or its "fresh" fungus,Do you have the lens to inspect it more closely?
After buying the primoplan with all its coating damage,if this lens is a good lens and at a great price...it may well be worth the risk. It's a tough call Andreas,but we do know if we pass on one lens, another will come along in better condition and sometimes a better price.  _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
thank you very much everyone for your kind answers, for sharing your insights!
well, this rear element actually isn't all that big, it is a cheap lens. I had opened and cleaned the same lens before, it is not difficult. I don't have the lens, only downloaded photos.
I agree, from own experience, that fungus usually doesn't effect IQ and also can be easily cleaned. Coating damage on the rear lens however, also from own experience, i am quite wary about. Here it only would be two small spots though and therefore not a big problem.
Still, as mentioned I have never encountered such fungus with real dark black spot in it's core, I wonder if anyone has had experience with this particular kind of fungus and can say more about it.
because it is a cheap lens and because with a bit of patience I may get a clean copy for just 10 usd more I think that it's more clever to give it a pass. On the other hand, just to find out if it can be cleaned or not, I am also still tempted to get it
thank you again,
andreas _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mo
 Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 9029 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
For 10usd it could be a valuable learning curve that gives you insight on any future issues with this sort of fungus. I always think trust your gut instinct and let it pass. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
| mo wrote: |
| For 10usd it could be a valuable learning curve that gives you insight on any future issues with this sort of fungus. I always think trust your gut instinct and let it pass. |
right! what I said was that I believe that for 10 usd more I could get a clean copy, cost of this lens incl. shipping actually would be around 25 to 30 usd, still not much.. _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
guardian
 Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1747
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
| kuuan wrote: |
| Coating damage on the rear lens however, also from own experience, i am quite wary about. |
Agreed. This is a useful and valuable observation, worthy of note.
Coating damage, or for that matter damage of any nature whatsoever, is more serious when present at the rear of the lens.
Overriding that, though, when it comes to damaged lenses needing repair or refurbishing, is cost. If cost is sufficiently low you can take a flyer on virtually any lens! If things don't work out you write the cost off to education and parts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Layer-cake
 Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 560 Location: Cape Town
|
Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Layer-cake wrote:
what type of lens is it if you font mind me asking, might give a clue to what could be expected from the coatings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
oh, a humble but fantastic Auto Takumar 2/55. The sale finished, but already I got a different copy copy instead  _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Layer-cake
 Joined: 18 Mar 2013 Posts: 560 Location: Cape Town
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2014 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Layer-cake wrote:
Yeah I would probably say thats best considering how cheaply they go for, I would think the coatings would be quite soft on a lens of that era but to be honest I have never seen a scratch on any of the takumars that have come my way! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|