Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Front glass of Jupiter-9
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:13 am    Post subject: Front glass of Jupiter-9 Reply with quote

I have an M39 Jupiter-9 that has a very bad front glass with thousand of cleaning marks and some of them are quite deep. Photos taken by this lens is very soft and glowing at f/2 to f/4. I took out the front glass and tried to clean, and found out that only that glass is the problem, the rest of the lens is very good. Just by cleaning that glass, now the images look better, so I want to fix the lens by finding a broken Jupiter-9 with intact front glass for replacement.
My question is: can I use the front glass of other Jupiter-9 versions, such as the ones for Kiev cameras, for this one? These designs may be mainly different in the rear part, am I wrong?
I asked that because normally these versions are cheaper, so I even can buy a working one for fixing my lens.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just bookmarking this, as I am curious to see what the answers are. Very Happy


PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A copy made in the same factory with close serial number should do. It may be possible to take out the whole optical part from a Keiv and put it into a M39 copy but I am not sure.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Front glass should be easily swap-able. I've done it with a few Helios 44 versions before.

The entire optical barrel should be identical in most cases too. I had one J9 from a kiev rangefinder and in screws right into the m39 SLR helical. It doesn't match perfectly because the aperture ring construction is different but it works. The only one that is not compatible is the J9 for Kiev 10/15. The barrel is a very different construction. The front element still might work though.


PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

themoleman342 wrote:
Front glass should be easily swap-able. I've done it with a few Helios 44 versions before.

The entire optical barrel should be identical in most cases too. I had one J9 from a kiev rangefinder and in screws right into the m39 SLR helical. It doesn't match perfectly because the aperture ring construction is different but it works. The only one that is not compatible is the J9 for Kiev 10/15. The barrel is a very different construction. The front element still might work though.


That's what I need to know, thank you very much, and thank you mo and calvin83 to join this thread Very Happy

When I find a good one and do the swapping, I will post photos here Smile


PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's probably going to be difficult getting a clean scratch-free front element super cheap.
I found this guy who seems to be parting a J9 out:
Click here to see on Ebay
Click here to see on Ebay

Maybe it's worth sending him a message?


PostPosted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

themoleman342 wrote:
It's probably going to be difficult getting a clean scratch-free front element super cheap.
I found this guy who seems to be parting a J9 out:
Click here to see on Ebay
Click here to see on Ebay

Maybe it's worth sending him a message?


Thank you for your information. I know this guy, he sold me the early Helios 44 #0006980 and also has some very rare, old lenses. I found the first link before but didn't ask him about the rest of the lens. I'm sending a message to ask him now. What you say is right, I can't find any replacement that is cheap enough for the last several days Sad


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Only as a side note:
I read in an old Hasselblad forum magazine a interview with I think a Zeiss lens designer. There was something about lens manufacturing: Before CNC machining the lenses, it was common to pair lenses, so for a bit crude example take a lens with a bit more thickness and pair it with one witch is a bit too short. Or at least say this lens is too long, so we need a shorter shim between these lens groups.

This is likely the reason why we sometimes find notices on the border of lenses when we disassemble lenses.
So it could be that the front lens has some tolerances which where compensated with another lens, or a shim in the lens.
Likely this does not extreme harm to the image quality, but it could make the lens inferior to other lenses from the same type.


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Different batches may have slightly different glass and coating. This is why I suggest transfer the entire optical barrel but not only the front element.


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZoneV wrote:
Only as a side note:
I read in an old Hasselblad forum magazine a interview with I think a Zeiss lens designer. There was something about lens manufacturing: Before CNC machining the lenses, it was common to pair lenses, so for a bit crude example take a lens with a bit more thickness and pair it with one witch is a bit too short. Or at least say this lens is too long, so we need a shorter shim between these lens groups.

This is likely the reason why we sometimes find notices on the border of lenses when we disassemble lenses.
So it could be that the front lens has some tolerances which where compensated with another lens, or a shim in the lens.
Likely this does not extreme harm to the image quality, but it could make the lens inferior to other lenses from the same type.


Wow, so that's why it's there! I wondered the same thing when I disassembled some lenses, it's very common to have a small ring on the border, and I thought it's just a kind of spacer to separate the elements.

calvin83 wrote:
Different batches may have slightly different glass and coating. This is why I suggest transfer the entire optical barrel but not only the front element.


I agree with you, but I only can do it if I'm lucky enough to find a good replacement.
I contacted one seller, he agreed to help me finding the front element, but this part added $30-$40 to the total value of my lens, which is equal to the price of a good copy already. If I have to change the whole block, maybe it's better to just purchasing another lens.
I hope that the difference is not significant Sad