Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Frankesteinizing a K10D
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Digital SLR Cameras
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11819
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:09 pm    Post subject: Frankesteinizing a K10D Reply with quote

A morbid idea crossed my mind:do you think it could be possible to take a Pentax K10D and have it's mount changed into a Contax-Yashica mount?
The register distances are nearly identical (only 0.04 mm difference).
What would happen to the other features of the camera?
Would the image stabilization still work?
Would the focus confirmation still work?

Anyone has any idea?
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bob



Level 2

Joined: 15 Mar 2007
Posts: 402
Location: Wentzville, Mo.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2 aspirin and go to bed. Laughing Laughing
_________________
Bob
"In terms of addiction, there is nothing more powerful than men's toys."
Sammy Davis Jr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jesito



Level 3

Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 2081
Location: Sitges, (Spain)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:05 am    Post subject: Re: Frankesteinizing a K10D Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
A morbid idea crossed my mind:do you think it could be possible to take a Pentax K10D and have it's mount changed into a Contax-Yashica mount?
The register distances are nearly identical (only 0.04 mm difference).
What would happen to the other features of the camera?
Would the image stabilization still work?
Would the focus confirmation still work?

Anyone has any idea?


Orio, probably the answer is yes to both questions. I owned the K100DS that has the same mount than the K10D, and placing a simple M42 to Pentax-K ring inside the mount, you got all the M42 lenses estabilized and focus confirmed... So this should also happen as well if you replace the mount by a Contax/yashica one... No electrical/electronic implications on this.

Jes.
_________________
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 18-200, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro (Adaptall)
Fixed CZJ Planar 50mm 1.7, Helios 44-2, Cosinon 28mm, CZJ Sonnar 135, Industar-61, Jupiter-9, Industar-50, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8
DSLR Canon 350D, Pentax K10D
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Mamiya 645E, Petri 6x45, Nettar
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX I, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30, EXA500, EXA 1A
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Olympus 35RC, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret LR, Welta Welti-I
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Minox 35 ML, Canon Prima Super 105
Compact Digital Caplio GX100, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot 520


Life is that boring wasted time in between two pictures
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
luisalegria



Level 3

Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 831
Location: San Francisco, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say - probably.

My K100D looks like the mount would be easy enough to remove. It is designed to be removed, it seems.

However -

It is an evil and unnatural act, and you will suffer a horrible fate at the hands of the accursed creature you create.

(This warning is required by the mad scientist labeling act of 1987. )
_________________
Pentax K100D, SV, SP1000, SP500, LX, SF10, Mamiya 1000TL, Sears/Ricoh TLS, Exakta VX, VXIIb, Olympus OM-10, Nikon FM, Zeiss Contaflex B, Retina Reflex S, IV, Rolleiflex, Speed Graphic & Meridian 4x5, misc. rangefinders and folders, several dozen lenses and etc., et. al., ad infinitum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bruce



Level 1

Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 117
Location: Boston, Ma USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh goody... I hope you are going to post pictures of the process Orio.
I fear upgrading my 400d to another cam other than the Canon, and losing my Contax Z's. But that Pentax has some nice features. Or am I getting too far ahead of myself here?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zewrak



Level 3

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 805

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shouldnt be harder then to remove the outer ring of the mount, which I think is only fitted with 4-5 screws. and then put in a machined C/Y ring? Whats the differences in the mount measurements except for the distance to the sensor? Inner diameter etc?
_________________
My Flickr - Takumar.org
PENTAX K10D, Spotmatic
Asahi Auto Takumar 85/1.8
Asahi Takumar 105/2.8 135/3.5
Asahi Super Takumar 20/4.5 50/1.4 55/1.8 85/1.9 105/2.8 135/3.5 150/4 200/4
Asahi S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 300/4
Asahi S-M-C Macro-Takumar 50/4,100/4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
F16SUNSHINE



Level 3

Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 2240
Location: Anacortes Washington

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it could be tough. The lens release mechanism for C/Y is quite integral to the front end of a yashica or contax camera. You would need a donor camera for organs and, enough room to mount the whole assembly on the front of the pentax. Converting to leica or zuiko would be more feasible at least mechanically requiring some shimming I would guess. I say that not knowing the exact register distantance(s).
_________________
Current Kit
Canon 5D, 40D
Contax 4/18, 1.4/50, 1.4/85, 2.8/85, 2/100, 3.5/100, 2.8/180, Rollei HFT 1.4/35, 1.4/85, Zuiko 2/21, 2/24, 2/28, 2/35, 2/80, Yashica ML 3.5/21, 2.8/24, Helios 40 protype, Trioplan 2.8/100, Tair 11A,
Epson R D1(s), Bessa L, Bessa R2m, Leica CL, CV 4.5/15, 4/25, 1.4/40, Zeiss ZM 2/35, Yashinon1.8/50, CLE 4/90, Zeiss Opton 4/135 T, Electro GT, Electro GX, Electro CC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7232
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it was only the ring, it wouldn't be a problem, I guess. But as Andy has already mentioned, any mechanical functional part makes more difficult.
If you want to try, I would recommend not to use a K10D, but try to find a used old Pentax DSLR (*istD or something) to play with. Wink
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS500, Spotmatic SPII, Yashica-24, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Kiron: 2/28;70-210 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;2.8/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 1.7/50;2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Petri2.8/28; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; 2.8/135; Weltblick3.5/135; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
hacksawbob



Level 3

Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 1057
Location: LANCS UK

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It is an evil and unnatural act, and you will suffer a horrible fate at the hands of the accursed creature you create.

(This warning is required by the mad scientist labeling act of 1987. )


HA HA

there would be auto focus contacts in the pentax mount maybe that need to be removed as well, maybe worth buying a broken pentax to perform your perverted experiments Smile The only thing that keeps me from ditching all my canon digital gear is the c\y issue if there were a working solution for this I would buy the K20D as soon as it was economically viable.
_________________
LENS LIST
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11819
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

guys,
you know I am not able to make such precision handiwork - of course I would committ the job to a professional should I ever decided to do that.

@ Bruce... I don't even have the camera, Bruce! It's just speculation on my part for now. I love the colours of the k10D (many Pentax people seem to dislike them, I don't know why), but a Pentax mount would be of little use to me.

@ Andy: the donor camera is not a problem, there are many Yashicas around for little money, and surely I can find a broken one in no time on Ebay. Thanks for pointing out the mechanical problem. It's precious information.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jieffe



Level 2

Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Posts: 277
Location: Brugelette, Belgium

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Someone modified the K mount to accept C/Y lenses.

http://forum.contax-club.org/viewtopic.php?t=12815

(found this link in a previous discussion http://forum.mflenses.com/pentax-k10d-and-manual-focus-lenses-t3281,start,15.html
_________________
The gear I use : Samsung GX1s, a few Tamron, Pentax, East German and Russian lenses (Modded Canon G2 for IR).
Gimp & Ufraw on Linux Zenwalk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11819
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Guido, I remember that discussion. The adaptation of an existing mount would probably both ruin the existing mount and not be effective and safe with the C/Y lenses. I would think of replacing the mount entirely instead. Make it the C/Y digital reflex that does not exist. Of course such a purpose would be easier with a Canon camera (and I will do that one day probably on my current 5D, after I have gotten a second Canon FF body). But Pentax k10D colours are different and offer some strenghts in the reds that Canon has not.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7232
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Removing the whole mount is, how can I put it?, a "clean" way.
I like the idea to "manufacture" a "new" kind of camera.
If you have many good lenses with one mount (just like your CY, Orio), this might be a very clever solution.
I'll keep my fingers crossed for you that you can find a way to do it.
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS500, Spotmatic SPII, Yashica-24, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Kiron: 2/28;70-210 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;2.8/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 1.7/50;2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Petri2.8/28; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; 2.8/135; Weltblick3.5/135; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
maddog10



Level 3

Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 985
Location: Maryland, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Frankesteinizing a K10D Reply with quote

Jesito wrote:
Orio, probably the answer is yes to both questions. I owned the K100DS that has the same mount than the K10D, and placing a simple M42 to Pentax-K ring inside the mount, you got all the M42 lenses estabilized and focus confirmed... So this should also happen as well if you replace the mount by a Contax/yashica one... No electrical/electronic implications on this.

Jes.


Jes (like the new avatar),
I have the Pentax M42 lens to K mount adapter and do not get focus confirmation on my K10D.
_________________
Michael Hill

DSLR: Nikon - D3, D80, D40 Canon- 5D
Film: Nikon - F5, F2, F, EM, FG, FE, Nikkorex Contax - G2 Mamiya - M645 Olympus - OM1 Praktika - LTL PLC3 Pentax - Spotmatic SP Yashica Electro 35 GSN Zenit - B
Nikon Mount Lens: Nikkor - 2.8/20 2.8/24 2/28 2.8/28 3.5/28 2/35 2.8/35 1.4/50 1.8/50 2/50 1.8/85 2/85 2.5/105 2.8/135 3.5/135 2.8/180 4/200 4.5/300 Micro 2.8/55 Micro 4/200 Zoom 3.5/36-72 3.5/43-86 4/70-210 Sigma - Zoom 2.8-4/35-70 Soligor - 3.5-4.5/28-80 4.5/80-200 5.6/95-310 Tamron - SP 2.8-3.8/35-80 SP 3.5/70-210 3.8-4/80-210 Vivitar - 3.8/19 2.8/28 (Series 1) 3.5-4.5/19-35 (Kiron) 3.5/70-210 Zenitar - 2.8/16
Contax Mount Lens: Carl Zeiss - Biogon 2.8/21 Biogon 2.8/28 Planar 2/45 Sonnar 2.8/90 Yashica - 4.5/70-210
M42 Screw Mount Lens: CZJ - Flek 2.8/20 Flek 2.4/35 Tessar 2.8/50 3.5/135 Focal - 2.8/28 Helios - 44-2 2/58 44M 2/58 44M-4 2/58 40 1.5/85 Industar - 50-2 3.5/50 Jupiter - 37A 3.5/135 Meyer Optik Gorlitz - Domiplan 2.8/50 MIR - 24M 2/35 1B 2.8/37 Pentacon - 2.8/29 1.8/50 2.8/135 Pentax - SMC 3.5/135 SMC 4/200 SMC 5.6/400 Rexatar - 6.3/400 Rokinon - 3.5-4.5/35-135 Sears - 2.8/28 2.8/135 4.5/90-230 Soligor - 2.8/105 3.5-4.5/28-80
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zewrak



Level 3

Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 805

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Frankesteinizing a K10D Reply with quote

maddog10 wrote:
Jesito wrote:
Orio, probably the answer is yes to both questions. I owned the K100DS that has the same mount than the K10D, and placing a simple M42 to Pentax-K ring inside the mount, you got all the M42 lenses estabilized and focus confirmed... So this should also happen as well if you replace the mount by a Contax/yashica one... No electrical/electronic implications on this.

Jes.


Jes (like the new avatar),
I have the Pentax M42 lens to K mount adapter and do not get focus confirmation on my K10D.


Then you are doing something wrong. Wink
_________________
My Flickr - Takumar.org
PENTAX K10D, Spotmatic
Asahi Auto Takumar 85/1.8
Asahi Takumar 105/2.8 135/3.5
Asahi Super Takumar 20/4.5 50/1.4 55/1.8 85/1.9 105/2.8 135/3.5 150/4 200/4
Asahi S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 300/4
Asahi S-M-C Macro-Takumar 50/4,100/4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Digital SLR Cameras All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group