View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4572 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:15 am Post subject: first takes Komura LTM 3.5/105 |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
the first trial shot taken with a rather old Komura LTM 3.5/105 on Ricoh GXR M ( had shown the lens two days ago in the equipment gallery: http://forum.mflenses.com/komura-ltm-3-5-105-and-2-8-135-t68917.html )
this lens looses a lot of contrast when shot against light, it requires a hood! Well, I didn't use any, I never do, but I am used to and again used my left hand for the same purpose.
stopped down to about f8 at infinity, sharpened after resize
100% crop of jpeg out of cam, no sharpening, no pping:
jpeg out of cam, sharpened after resize:
100% crop of jpeg out of cam, no sharpening, no pping:
jpeg out of cam, sharpened after resize:
after quite aggressive pping including downing clarity ( to emphasize the dreamy effect this lens lends to )
one more after pping
_________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
!Karen
Joined: 20 Jul 2013 Posts: 837 Location: Belgium Baby
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
!Karen wrote:
I like the soft and dreamy flower shots. _________________ FLICKR PHOTOSTREAM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16541 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Very low contrast as expected, but nice and dreamy indeed! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JJB
Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 424 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJB wrote:
They do have a nice soft quality.
I have a 135/3.5 Komura that was branded under Soligar that looks very very similar to yours in style. There was a dramatic difference in IQ when I used a hood. You might want to give it a try to expand the versatility of this lovely lens. _________________ Nikon D80 with 18/55 kit lens
Fujifilm XE-1 with 18/55 kit lens
Lenses:
Konica Hexanon: 28/3.5, 50/1.7 (EE), 55/3.5 macro, 135/3.2 28-135/4-4.5, 80-200/4
Mamiya Sekor SX 28/2.8, 50/2, 55/1.4, 135/2.8
Minolta: 50/1.7, 35-70/3.5, 35-105/3.5-4.5
Olympus Zuiko: 28/3.5, 50/1.8, 85/2
Rikenon: 55/1.4
Soligor: 135s made by Tamron, Komura, Tokina
Takumar/Asahi/Pentax: Pentax M 35/2.8, SMC Takumar 35/3.5, 50/1.7 (Pentax) 55/1.8 (Super Tak), 105/2.8, 200/4
Tokina 60-300, 4-5.6
Tamron: 103A 80-210/3.8-4, 46A 70-210/3.8-4, 300/5.6 (Vernon Edonar)
Vivitar: 28/2.5, S1 28-90/2.8 (Komine), S1 70-210/3.5 (Kiron)
Yashica: ML 28/2.8, 50/2
Yashinon: 50/1.4
German: Meyer Gorlitz Oreston 50/1.8, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen 135/3.5, Schneider-Kreuzach 200/5.5
Soviet: Helios 44/2, Helios 44/4, Industar 50/3.5 (both silver and black) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4572 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
thank you guys for looking and commenting!
JTB I did use my left hand to 'make' a lens hood, I'd think with even better effect than any actual lens hood could give. Using the mirrorless cam, that is live view, I could exactly see how very much this lens needs that and that simulating a lens hood had a big impact. ( I am using a rel. small waist bag for carrying my camera and lenses, my arms free and never pain in the shoulder after a full day carrying my gear - that is I love my gear to be light and small and to fit into a small bag, therefore I hardly ever use a lens hood but simulate one with my left hand whenever I deem, and in live view see, that it's necessary ) _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
I do that a lot too, use the hand as a hood
The lens seems to give decent results IMO _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
I do that a lot too, use the hand as a hood
The lens seems to give decent results IMO |
Me too.
It is lacking contrast more than I would have expected, but the effect is beautiful in these type pictures. It is definitely an earlier Komura and probably very well built. I have the 2.5/105 and like it very much... as well the 2.8/135. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JJB
Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 424 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJB wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Nordentro wrote: |
I do that a lot too, use the hand as a hood
The lens seems to give decent results IMO |
Me too.
It is lacking contrast more than I would have expected, but the effect is beautiful in these type pictures. It is definitely an earlier Komura and probably very well built. I have the 2.5/105 and like it very much... as well the 2.8/135. |
Clearly, you gentlemen have steadier hands than I do. My compliments! At my present level of experience, I need to keep both hands on the camera. _________________ Nikon D80 with 18/55 kit lens
Fujifilm XE-1 with 18/55 kit lens
Lenses:
Konica Hexanon: 28/3.5, 50/1.7 (EE), 55/3.5 macro, 135/3.2 28-135/4-4.5, 80-200/4
Mamiya Sekor SX 28/2.8, 50/2, 55/1.4, 135/2.8
Minolta: 50/1.7, 35-70/3.5, 35-105/3.5-4.5
Olympus Zuiko: 28/3.5, 50/1.8, 85/2
Rikenon: 55/1.4
Soligor: 135s made by Tamron, Komura, Tokina
Takumar/Asahi/Pentax: Pentax M 35/2.8, SMC Takumar 35/3.5, 50/1.7 (Pentax) 55/1.8 (Super Tak), 105/2.8, 200/4
Tokina 60-300, 4-5.6
Tamron: 103A 80-210/3.8-4, 46A 70-210/3.8-4, 300/5.6 (Vernon Edonar)
Vivitar: 28/2.5, S1 28-90/2.8 (Komine), S1 70-210/3.5 (Kiron)
Yashica: ML 28/2.8, 50/2
Yashinon: 50/1.4
German: Meyer Gorlitz Oreston 50/1.8, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen 135/3.5, Schneider-Kreuzach 200/5.5
Soviet: Helios 44/2, Helios 44/4, Industar 50/3.5 (both silver and black) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4572 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
thank's Lars and Woodrim. Had bought some rigid metal lens hoods before, have a few original ones, but if I used any, which has been very rarely, then it has been the cheapest type, a plastic, collapsible one.
JJB wrote: |
woodrim wrote: |
Nordentro wrote: |
I do that a lot too, use the hand as a hood
The lens seems to give decent results IMO |
Me too.
It is lacking contrast more than I would have expected, but the effect is beautiful in these type pictures. It is definitely an earlier Komura and probably very well built. I have the 2.5/105 and like it very much... as well the 2.8/135. |
Clearly, you gentlemen have steadier hands than I do. My compliments! At my present level of experience, I need to keep both hands on the camera. |
having to take the left hand off the camera to put it to the front of the lens, which also stabilizes but most likely less so, is a disadvantage. But whenever a hood is required more often than not there is enough sunlight to enable a fast shutter speed, as was the case yesterday, and additional stability hardly was required.
_________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4572 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
second time used this lens, this time on Ricoh GXR M in Saigon
pics taken with another version of this lens: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=34326&highlight=&sid=e285b09fbc29c234e85968d8472398c0 _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|