View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
caspert79
 Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2180 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 2:33 pm Post subject: First shots Petri MC 28mm f/2 |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
This lens is apparently the same as the Cosinon-W 28mm f/2. Some first shots. Click twice for full size.
First, wide open:
PetriMC28mmf2_3 by devoscasper, on Flickr
Wide open, there is softness from spherical aberration, but there's still quite a good amount of detail. Contrast and colors of the image are very good.
Stopped down to f/2.8:
PetriMC28mmf2_2 by devoscasper, on Flickr
Softness is mostly gone, good resolution and very contrasty image with popping colors.
Again, wide open:
PetriMC28mmf2_8 by devoscasper, on Flickr
Good saturation, nice bokeh, good contrast.
Stopped down to f/4:
PetriMC28mmf2_9 by devoscasper, on Flickr
Nice popping image with still good bokeh. There's a tiny loss of sharpness due to the long shutter speed (1/8 sec, handheld).
Shot at f/5.6:
PetriMC28mmf2 by devoscasper, on Flickr
Resolution is very high, at least in the center area (I didn't test corners yet).
f/2 maximum aperture allows for this kind of shots:
PetriMC28mmf2_7 by devoscasper, on Flickr
PetriMC28mmf2_1 by devoscasper, on Flickr
I have to say I'm really happy with this lens: it's well built, compact (filter size 49mm) and it delivers popping images without the need for additional post processing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2676 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Nice evaluation. Thanks. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ultrapix
 Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 457 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Nice samples! This is a lens I'm curious about; may I please ask for a couple of shots at the two largest apertures of a subject that would make clear the homogeneity of detail across the field? Even a landscape is fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caspert79
 Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2180 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Ultrapix wrote: |
Nice samples! This is a lens I'm curious about; may I please ask for a couple of shots at the two largest apertures of a subject that would make clear the homogeneity of detail across the field? Even a landscape is fine. |
Sure, will do that later. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caspert79
 Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2180 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Here's a test @ infinity. Camera used: Sony A7R2.
First, the area's in the image I used for the crops (center, edge,corner):
PetriMC28mmf2_5circle by devoscasper, on Flickr
Then, the results:
comparison by devoscasper, on Flickr
I think we can conclude that there are 28mm lenses with better edge and corner performance. Nevertheless, the Cosinon / Petri generates a very pleasing image, perhaps more suitable for street photography / indoor pictures etc. My favorite classic 28mm for landscapes remains the Pentax (K) 28mm f/3.5, but the Cosinon is a great alternative when speed / shallow DOF are needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marcusBMG
 Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1266 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Thanks for doing the test pics, those results are very comparable to those from my komine vivitar 28mm f2 and kiron 28mm f2. I have yet to find a 28mm that really knocks me down for edge and corner performance - and that's with apsc cameras. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dejan
 Joined: 05 Jan 2021 Posts: 87 Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dejan wrote:
I suppose you'd be more pleased with Olympus or Minolta 28mm F2 then (I haven't used those personally). I do like my SMC Pentax 28mm F2 though, it's fantastic but rare and too pricy. I also have this Petri (branded as Cosinon), I liked it for close ups (mushrooms in the forest etc., also with achromatic close up glass) on FF, and it performed decently on APS-C years ago (stopped down). It's sharp for close ups, like it's already been mentioned, and that's where I saw it's potential use. Since I prefer SMC Pentax 28mm F2 and Olympus 28mm F3.5 for most of my needs, I'll just give this one to a friend. It's a fun lens and it deserve to be used. For landscapes I'd choose something else, there are cheaper and better choices. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caspert79
 Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2180 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Dejan wrote: |
I suppose you'd be more pleased with Olympus or Minolta 28mm F2 then (I haven't used those personally). I do like my SMC Pentax 28mm F2 though, it's fantastic but rare and too pricy. I also have this Petri (branded as Cosinon), I liked it for close ups (mushrooms in the forest etc., also with achromatic close up glass) on FF, and it performed decently on APS-C years ago (stopped down). It's sharp for close ups, like it's already been mentioned, and that's where I saw it's potential use. Since I prefer SMC Pentax 28mm F2 and Olympus 28mm F3.5 for most of my needs, I'll just give this one to a friend. It's a fun lens and it deserve to be used. For landscapes I'd choose something else, there are cheaper and better choices. |
For the 25 bucks I paid for it I’m perfectly happy  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dejan
 Joined: 05 Jan 2021 Posts: 87 Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dejan wrote:
Oh yes, they usually go for over a hundred or thereabouts. I've paid mine 30 eur, a few years ago. I imagine that would be impossible if the name was at least Konica, if not Nikon or Pentax. It's not really well-built like those though, just a bit clunky and the focusing goes very easy with mine, but perhaps too easy? I don't know, I was still perfectly happy. I also like how it works when reversed for macro. I think this is the first lens I've tried that technique with. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caspert79
 Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2180 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
Thanks for doing the test pics, those results are very comparable to those from my komine vivitar 28mm f2 and kiron 28mm f2. I have yet to find a 28mm that really knocks me down for edge and corner performance - and that's with apsc cameras. |
Try out the SMC Pentax 28/3.5. Here’s a comparison against a Mamiya I did earlier:
http://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-sekor-e-28-2-8-vs-smc-pentax-28-3-5-t83688.html
I think that’s really respectable performance on a 42+ mp ff sensor. I expect it to do good on most apsc sensors. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1N0
 Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2270
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
It is more like the Vivitar 28/2 by Komine than it is like the one by Kino, which has more distinctive bokeh. When adding another 28/2 to the collection I would probably skip this one unless it came very cheap. The Pentax-m or Pentax-a 28mm/2 still has my interest though. _________________ pentaxian
Last edited by D1N0 on Sat Sep 03, 2022 2:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ultrapix
 Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 457 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Yep, the usual mixed bag that these lens all end up turning out to be.
At 25 of course I'd buy it on the spot! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
marcusBMG
 Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1266 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
I was fortunate to pick up an ok example pentax K for a very good price back in 2015. I should use it more, I jus tlike the convenience of the PKA mount on the kiron, and it's rendering. Unless I am shooting architecture or infinity landscapes, the distinctly better technical performance of the pentax isn't missed.
I did this comparison of 5 x 28's back then on my K5. Result for miniwide II is OOF though - IIRC infinity focus was out on the lens. All at wide open aperture. Top: pentax K 28mm f3.5; 2. pentax M 28mm f3.5; 3. pentax M 28mm f2.8; 4. sigma miniwide II; 5. Bottom. Adaptall 02A 28mm f2.5
CLICK ON PIC FOR FULL SIZED.
 _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
caspert79
 Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 2180 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
I was fortunate to pick up an ok example pentax K for a very good price back in 2015. I should use it more, I jus tlike the convenience of the PKA mount on the kiron, and it's rendering. Unless I am shooting architecture or infinity landscapes, the distinctly better technical performance of the pentax isn't missed.
I did this comparison of 5 x 28's back then on my K5. Result for miniwide II is OOF though - IIRC infinity focus was out on the lens. All at wide open aperture. Top: pentax K 28mm f3.5; 2. pentax M 28mm f3.5; 3. pentax M 28mm f2.8; 4. sigma miniwide II; 5. Bottom. Adaptall 02A 28mm f2.5
CLICK ON PIC FOR FULL SIZED.
 |
Thanks for sharing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
haytypical
Joined: 14 Mar 2023 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
haytypical wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
I was fortunate to pick up an ok example pentax K for a very good price back in 2015. I should use it more, I jus tlike the convenience of the PKA mount on the kiron, and it's rendering. Unless I am shooting architecture or infinity landscapes, the distinctly better technical performance of the pentax isn't missed.redactle
I did this comparison of 5 x 28's back then on my K5. Result for miniwide II is OOF though - IIRC infinity focus was out on the lens. All at wide open aperture. Top: pentax K 28mm f3.5; 2. pentax M 28mm f3.5; 3. pentax M 28mm f2.8; 4. sigma miniwide II; 5. Bottom. Adaptall 02A 28mm f2.5
CLICK ON PIC FOR FULL SIZED.
 |
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kypfer
 Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 458 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
I bought a Petri 28mm f/2 (cheaply) mostly for astro work … it's OK but does suffer from coma in the outer field at wide aperture, even on APS-C.
I've been fortunate enough to also accrue a Kiron 28mm f/2, also very economically, more in hope than in anger, but found it to be much of a muchness, neither significantly better or worse than the Petri.
I don't remember using either lens for more "conventional" photography, so I've nothing to add in that direction. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|