 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 1021
Location: Nice, France
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:29 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| zewrak wrote: | | The only flaw in that is the lifespan of the new cameras. I have had my k10D for about half a year and it already is up at 25000 exposures. In 2 years time, I have passed the 100.000 exposures that the camera is "expected" to last. |
Whats the development and printing cost on 100,000 exposures for 35mm film?
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ais, Ai'ed, pre-Ai
Camera: Nikon D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 non-AI | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Nikkor-S.C 50mm f/1.4 non-AI | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Vivitar Series 1 (Kiron) 70-210 f/3.5 | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 831
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ChrisLilley wrote: | | zewrak wrote: | | The only flaw in that is the lifespan of the new cameras. I have had my k10D for about half a year and it already is up at 25000 exposures. In 2 years time, I have passed the 100.000 exposures that the camera is "expected" to last. |
Whats the development and printing cost on 100,000 exposures for 35mm film? |
Alot. But you will not do 100.000 exposure any day soon with a analog camera. The digital workflow is different and thats why a digital camera will not last for as long as a analog camera. Ontop of that ofcourse there are parts that break in a digital camera that an analog camera don't have, the sensor for example has a limited number of exposures too.
_________________
My Flickr - Takumar.org
PENTAX K10D, Spotmatic
Asahi Auto Takumar 85/1.8
Asahi Takumar 105/2.8 135/3.5
Asahi Super Takumar 20/4.5 50/1.4 55/1.8 85/1.9 105/2.8 135/3.5 150/4 200/4
Asahi S-M-C Takumar 35/3.5 300/4
Asahi S-M-C Macro-Takumar 50/4,100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 3374
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rino wrote: | I saw thew new cameras with 21 or more mp, and his prices.
They duplicate -or more- the mp of the cam that the majority of us have now.
The future? Wait to the prices go down while others cams with much more mp appear in the market? Stay behind for ever?
Wait!! This is the order to the poor men. Are we? |
extracted from the above thread
| harindra wrote: | | I swapped my 50d for a 40d which is much sharper . What a waste |
| Daan B wrote: | | The 50D was basically ususable for me at ISO 1600. But even at ISO 800 there was considerable noise, whereas the 40D still looks good at ISO 1600 |
| Daan B wrote: | | When you compare the 40D/50D house images (RAW) from imaging-resource in ACR you will see that the 24-105L has troubles keeping up with the 50D but shines on the 40D |
_________________
Have a nice day
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Rss feed
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
