| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
JohnBar
Joined: 21 Jun 2012
Posts: 581
Location: Liverpool
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:06 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
JohnBar wrote:
_________________
Rectilux 3FF Series single focus anamorphic attachments
http://www.transferconvert.co.uk/cinemania/rectilux-3ff.html
Regular News on https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rectilux/704770636267200 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JohnBar
Joined: 21 Jun 2012
Posts: 581
Location: Liverpool
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JohnBar wrote:
| serkol wrote: |
I am also waiting for a parcel with 16L version  |
_________________
Rectilux 3FF Series single focus anamorphic attachments
http://www.transferconvert.co.uk/cinemania/rectilux-3ff.html
Regular News on https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rectilux/704770636267200 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7554
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
I sold my M42 copy and bought a LTM copy to use on my rangefinder. 
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
I wonder whether there is a difference between the earlier version of Chrome from 50-, and later "zebra" from 60-? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 4713
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| I sold my M42 copy and bought a LTM copy to use on my rangefinder. |
I have both the LTM and the m42 on my shelf, it is indeed very nice lenses
From the LTM
_________________
Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 3437
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
What a lovely portrait! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
simbon4o
Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 390
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
Nice one! I am curious about some night shots with lights at closed diaphragm
_________________
10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5  NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
Very nice portrait, Lars ! And beautiful child!
What about difference between M42 - LTM (chrome) version? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 4713
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
They are the same optically (LTM and m42). I compared the reflections in the elements and they are equal. The silver is a 85mm and could be different of course.
A few from the m42 version:
_________________
Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6009
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
OUCH! - those are great.
What wonderful results.
Thanks for sharing
OH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 2929
Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Recently tried mine on the a7ii with decent results. I am a huge fan of the zebra style (mostly german) short teles. I have the meyer trioplan 100/2.8, schact travenar 90mm 3.5, schneider tele-xenar 135.3.5, CZJ sonnar 135 3.5, enna tele ennalyt 135 3.5 and a vemar super bittco 135 3.5. All except the Bittco are really good. Those are all in Exakta mount though not the edixa versions. I'll have to see if I can find some of the photos.
_________________
photos are moments frozen in time |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 4713
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
You should look for the Meyer Orestor 100mm f/2.8 is you like short good zebralenses, fantastic lens!
_________________
Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16544
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
| Nordentro wrote: |
| You should look for the Meyer Orestor 100mm f/2.8 is you like short good zebralenses, fantastic lens! |
Cannot agree more to that!!
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 2929
Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2015 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I will definitely put that on my list. Already searching for a tele quinon and isco westanar.
_________________
photos are moments frozen in time |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 735
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
A-Schacht-Travenar is an amazing and fantastic lens. My picture is made with this lens in silver design and 85/2.8:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 735
|
| Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
next picture
 DSC02194 by Mr TTT, on Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
| Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
Hi all, just got this lens today in the Exakta mount, but something must be very wrong with my copy. it reaches infinity focus at 4 m distance on the focusing ring scale and then focuses way past infinity. Minimum focusing distance is also more than 1 m. Wide open the lens is very soft with a ton of abberations, it also swirls like crazy. The lens appears to have been opened in the past. My first theory is/was that the focusing rings aren t put togheter correctly, allowing the optical block to get too close to the focal plane/sensor. But....a big but....can this cause all sorts of abberations?
Wrong distance between lens elements? inverted element (it looks almost like a mod. Helios)? Missing element?
I opened the lens, the back group (behind the lens aperture) consists of only one element, looks to be in place correctly. At the front, the front lens is held in place by it s own retaining ring, after that a small block comes out and this looks to be really untouched. Everything gets into place well, no problems tightening anything.
I ll add that i CLA-ed more than 120 lenses by now
Anyone has the optical diagram? Ideas, suggestions?
EDIT: Stupid me....just saw the optical diagram in an eaarlier post
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
| Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
Oh yes, thanx to the diagram....you can barely see the last element, but it does look to be inverted compared to most back elements in other lenses, that it the more convex/curved part of the element facing the front of the lens. Tried it and it works lika a charm! Wide open sample:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
