Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Disappointing Distagon 3.5/18....
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 12:06 pm    Post subject: Disappointing Distagon 3.5/18.... Reply with quote

Here's one guy's opinion on the new Distagon 18 based on the sample images and the MTF charts:

http://ogiroux.blogspot.com/2008/07/disappointing-update-for-zf-18mm.html


PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 12:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

poilu wrote:
there are no bad Zeiss, only bad photographer


PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing


PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

poilu wrote:
poilu wrote:
there are no bad Zeiss, only bad photographer


Post that on his blog.... Laughing


PostPosted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bob wrote:
Post that on his blog....

that would be bad taste, he look a nice guy and just express his opinion Wink


PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The MTF chart is worth 100 pictures? Really?? I'd much rather look at nice pictures than a chart Smile

PS Haven't we see that girl on the rock here on this forum too?

http://ogiroux.blogspot.com/2008/07/cornucopia-of-zeiss-reviews.html

I'd much rather look at that girl than a chart Smile


PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Puplet wrote:
The MTF chart is worth 100 pictures? Really?? I'd much rather look at nice pictures than a chart Smile


Misquote. What he said was

Quote:
The MTF chart is quite valuable in this respect, and it's quite clear too. The chart is worth 100 test images.


and since he also said

Quote:
What I love most about this photographer’s reviews are the real-life image samples (this one from here).


it seems wrong to conclude that he does not value real-world images...