Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Different 35mm lenses out of my collection
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 1:25 pm    Post subject: Different 35mm lenses out of my collection Reply with quote

These are my 35mm lenses presently on hand:



Asahi Super-Takumar F2, Minolta MD W.Rokkor F2.8, Minolta AF F2,
Topcon UV Topcor F3.5, Voigtlaender Ultron F1.7, Jupiter 12 F2.8, ISCO Westron F3.5,
Nikon Nikkor-S F2.8, MIR-1 (37mm) F2.8, Yashica Yashinon-DX F2.8.

I will report in another thread about their main differences in quality.


PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the minolta Shocked
and the voigtlander Shocked

both on the wish list, a pity I can't find any Minolta at a good price Rolling Eyes


PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rick1779 wrote:
the minolta Shocked
and the voigtlander Shocked

both on the wish list, a pity I can't find any Minolta at a good price Rolling Eyes


Good choice! But what I've seen so far on my sample shots the Voigtlaender is most probably the best wide open, although it's my fastest lens in 35mm; i.e. not even slow lenses like the Topcor can beat it also fully open when I look at the fully open crops of both lenses.


PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love that Big Takumar in the back row.
Great collection, btw.


PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aanything wrote:
I love that Big Takumar in the back row.
Great collection, btw.


It's not bad either. Although it's quite a heavy and bulky beast.


PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 8:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

speaking of bulk and heavy although really good, you miss this one Wink



PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rick1779,

You are absulotely right. The Minolta is 12 gr. heavier than the Super Takumar (410 vs. 398). Wink

However, I don't have it. It seems to be a little bit less sharp than the "normal" F 2.8 version when stopped down. At least that are the findings from reports on the web. That was actually the reason why I never tried to find one, even in the "cheaper times", some years ago.

However, I am just preparing my big private 35mm lens test....


PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll look forward for that test! Wink
35mm has become my preferred focal lenght


PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The test of shown lenses: http://forum.mflenses.com/test-of-different-35mm-lenses-on-aps-c-sensor-t71258.html#1437373