View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2014 5:33 am Post subject: CZJ Biometar 2.8/120 on K-10D |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Dull overcast day for the most, then a short period of sunshine.
Some at f2.8, some not.
OH
Last edited by Oldhand on Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2014 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I am jealous,very nice images (was the lens found locally? ).I do like the details in the 2nd and 3rd images.Can't say I like the bokeh in #6 but its still a great image _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
mo wrote: |
I am jealous,very nice images (was the lens found locally? ).I do like the details in the 2nd and 3rd images.Can't say I like the bokeh in #6 but its still a great image |
Thanks Mo
Yes the bokeh there is a little nervous - too many sticks too close to the subject doesn't help either.
I have had this lens for quite a while - just haven't posted any images with it.
Not local I'm afraid - Germany I think because the postage was reasonable at the time and Germany has better postage rates than some other parts of Europe.
I am still playing with this lens.
I think it has more to offer than I am getting from it ATM.
We'll see
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
It does take a little while to get used to a lens,I think you are doing ok so far What styling is your lens? _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
mo wrote: |
It does take a little while to get used to a lens,I think you are doing ok so far What styling is your lens? |
It's the zebra version Mo.
Here is a piccie
OH
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kenetik
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 524
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kenetik wrote:
Wow, Oldhand. I am impressed by this set. Beautiful shots! _________________ ________________________________________________________
I buy lots of lenses and sometimes I even use them... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
I have a copy of the CZJ 120mm F2.8 Biometar. Its design is a 5-element Double-Gauss. The lateral chromatic aberration is practically nil, but there are some longitudinal chromatic and spherical aberrations, which produce a slight smoothing effect when the lens is wide open. Nonetheless, this effect can be desirable for portrait, which was the main application of this lens in the Pentacon Six system. From F5.6 onwards, the lens is sharp as a razor.
A little known feature of Biometar 120mm F2.8 is that there is significant focus-shift from F2.8 to F5.6. Always focus at working aperture in applications that require maximum sharpness.
Due to the Double-Gauss design, the Biometar can be used as an excellent macro lens with the aid of extension rings or bellows. In contrast, the performance of the usual lens 135mm F2.8 with type design and Ernostar Sonnar degrades rapidly for focus distances less than 1 m.
The main advantage of Ernostar design compared to the Double-Gauss is the smaller size. Therefore, for normal photographic use, 120mm F2.8 Biometar does not take much advantage in relation to a good lens 135mm F2.8, except for a lesser degree of lateral chromatic aberration and coma, which results in a best image quality at the edges. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2014 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
I have a copy of the CZJ 120mm F2.8 Biometar. Its design is a 5-element Double-Gauss. The lateral chromatic aberration is practically nil, but there are some longitudinal chromatic and spherical aberrations, which produce a slight smoothing effect when the lens is wide open. Nonetheless, this effect can be desirable for portrait, which was the main application of this lens in the Pentacon Six system. From F5.6 onwards, the lens is sharp as a razor.
A little known feature of Biometar 120mm F2.8 is that there is significant focus-shift from F2.8 to F5.6. Always focus at working aperture in applications that require maximum sharpness.
Due to the Double-Gauss design, the Biometar can be used as an excellent macro lens with the aid of extension rings or bellows. In contrast, the performance of the usual lens 135mm F2.8 with type design and Ernostar Sonnar degrades rapidly for focus distances less than 1 m.
The main advantage of Ernostar design compared to the Double-Gauss is the smaller size. Therefore, for normal photographic use, 120mm F2.8 Biometar does not take much advantage in relation to a good lens 135mm F2.8, except for a lesser degree of lateral chromatic aberration and coma, which results in a best image quality at the edges. |
Thank you Gerald for this information.
Your observation on focus shift I will keep in mind, but I am having difficulty seeing it through the viewfinder.
As a comparison, I shot some side by side images with the Biometar 2.8/120 and Mamiya 2.8/110
First at 2.8 then at f8.
Here are the results:
OH
Biometar @ 2.8 and then f8
Mamiya @ 2.8 and then f8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Your observation on focus shift I will keep in mind, but I am having difficulty seeing it through the viewfinder. |
Hi Oldhand,
Focus shift is a little hard to see when shooting a three-dimensional subject like a field of flowers because the act of closing the aperture simply changes the position of the plane of focus, but something will always be in focus. In contrast, when shooting a distant landscape or a flat object, the focus shift has the potential to reduce visibly the sharpness of the image.
I will try to show the focus shift with an example. I took three photos:
1) Aperture wide open, focus adjusted precisely with 11.7X live view magnification.
2) Aperture F8, without refocusing (same focus adjustment of photo no. 1)
3) Aperture F8, refocused to the working aperture.
The crop area is marked by a yellow rectangle in the full picture.
Full image:
100% crop - F2.8:
100% crop - F8 without refocusing, same focus as for F2.8:
100% crop - F8 after refocusing:
Some additional comments:
1) The resolution in the center of the field is already pretty good for wide open aperture.
2) The resolution drops significantly when closing the aperture to F8 without refocusing.
3) After refocusing, the resolution at F8 increases dramatically and, as expected, is much better than for wide open.
4) A rough estimate is that the focus shift reduces the resolution to half it could be.
4) It was not shown, but if the aperture is closed to F16 or F22, the depth of field is sufficient to mask the effect of the focus shift. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Thanks Gerald.
The difference is quite pronounced isn't it.
Much appreciated
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
Yes, the focus shift effect is pronounced when viewed at 100%. However, to be fair, the degradation in sharpness is not very noticeable in pictures viewed at normal distances. Besides, I don't know if it is easily visible in the optical viewfinder of a DSLR camera.
Maybe the pictures below give an different idea of the magnitude of the Biometar's focus shift. The pictures show the Biometar distance scale when the camera was on a tripod in a fixed position, and the lens was adjusted to best possible focus for F2.8 and F8, respectivelly.
Best focus for F2.8:
Best focus for F8:
Note that the variation in focus distance is about 5cm for a distance subject-to-camera equal to 2.5 meters. Focus errors of this magnitude are common for handheld operation, especially when the subject is not static. In fact, the focus accuracy of most phase-detection autofocus systems is not much better. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
Yes, the focus shift effect is pronounced when viewed at 100%. However, to be fair, the degradation in sharpness is not very noticeable in pictures viewed at normal distances. Besides, I don't know if it is easily visible in the optical viewfinder of a DSLR camera.
Maybe the pictures below give an different idea of the magnitude of the Biometar's focus shift. The pictures show the Biometar distance scale when the camera was on a tripod in a fixed position, and the lens was adjusted to best possible focus for F2.8 and F8, respectivelly.
Best focus for F2.8:
Best focus for F8:
Note that the variation in focus distance is about 5cm for a distance subject-to-camera equal to 2.5 meters. Focus errors of this magnitude are common for handheld operation, especially when the subject is not static. In fact, the focus accuracy of most phase-detection autofocus systems is not much better. |
Thank you Gerald.
This is an excellent illustration of the point that you are making about the Biometar.
Much appreciated
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|