| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: London, UK.
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:20 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
DSG wrote:
| LucisPictor wrote: |
| You can make your own aperture diaphragm, just put a disc with a whole in front of the lens. |
Obviously you mean "You can make your own aperture Iris", as an Iris is not a diaphragm!
Anyway, putting such a disk in front of the lens would'nt work as all it would do is cause huge vignetting...Any such disk must be fitted somwhere between the front and rear elements inside the lens.
I have a Helios 40 with no Iris (Its long story) and I have tried fitting black cardboard disks with various sized holes in them in place of the missing Iris blades and it works great.
You simply remove the front elements to gain access to the iris ring, push the disk into place and replace the front element.
Removing the front elements of his miltary version would be an identical process as its optically identical to the Helios 40 but as it never had an Iris built in he would need to taylor make the disk to fit inside the lens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Did you made any diamond shaped? I really love to see the bokeh samples.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: London, UK.
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
| Pancolart wrote: |
| Did you made any diamond shaped? I really love to see the bokeh samples. |
I never thought of making diamond or other shaped holes in the disks...I agree it would be interesting to see the OOF results. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blende8
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 260
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Thu May 27, 2010 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
blende8 wrote:
I have checked several examples of this lens and have found that there are two different ones.
The newer version (higher serial numbers) has a matt finish and a smoother focussing ring (not so "agricultural").
My copy of the better version has a serial number starting with 931.
Here are a few images:
_________________
Best wishes, Wieland
K-1, K-5IIs
Pentax, mysterium quod absconditum fuit ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blende8
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 260
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
blende8 wrote:
Does anybody know how to remove the tripod mount?
There are three small screws in the ring that points to the camera.
Is it possible to remove this ring, then, and remove the tripod collar?
Handling would be easier without it.
_________________
Best wishes, Wieland
K-1, K-5IIs
Pentax, mysterium quod absconditum fuit ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 1888
Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
Yep, they both come off.
To remove the ring, you need to loosen or remove all three of those tiny screws. The ring is actually threaded onto the lens body with very fine threads, so you unscrew the ring to remove it. It might be a bit stiff, as the three set screws have chewed up the threads. 
Once the ring is off, you just loosen the big knob on the tripod collar and it slides right off the back. 
_________________
Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers  ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blende8
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 260
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Sat May 29, 2010 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
blende8 wrote:
Thanks!
Got it off!
_________________
Best wishes, Wieland
K-1, K-5IIs
Pentax, mysterium quod absconditum fuit ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
1.5/85mm also exists with protruding back element. The later the version higher the possibility. I'd dare saying it's totally different lens design with much lower quality glass. You can also separate it by that bluish coating (compared to yellow Tomioka type calssic). Just ask the seller of the coloring - he will share that info more easily then to unscrew the lens...
Did anyone successfully used 1.2/85mm?
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 3168
Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Error! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 1705
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Where?
_________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blende8
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 260
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
blende8 wrote:
Some images with the Cyclop:
http://forum.digitalfotonetz.de/viewtopic.php?p=977455#977455
I have found it a quite useful lens.
Only I was missing 1/8000 s on my K20 at times.
_________________
Best wishes, Wieland
K-1, K-5IIs
Pentax, mysterium quod absconditum fuit ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
For instance this sample is surely the crappy one (sorry Seller): Click here to see on Ebay.de
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
egidio
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 222
Location: slovenia
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
egidio wrote:
yes, if it looks like it has step-up ring in front than its non usable on cameras
_________________
I use: Flektogon 2.8/20, Flektogon 2.8/35, planar 50mm/1.4, Takumar 1.4/50mm, Takumar 1.9/85, MIR 24H, Mir1v, Industar-50-2, Helios-44-2, Pentacon 2.8/135, cyclop 85 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2010 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
I say it again - that blue glass is identifier of protuberant variant.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
| blende8 wrote: |
I have checked several examples of this lens and have found that there are two different ones.
The newer version (higher serial numbers) has a matt finish and a smoother focussing ring (not so "agricultural").
My copy of the better version has a serial number starting with 931.
Here are a few images:
|
What you call matt finish looks like a textured paint. Why is that one better? Does it have anything to do with having the name Cyclops as opposed to that other marking?
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I have purchased this one and am hoping it is usable version...
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Nothing to worry about there. Enjoy your Helios!
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 4045
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
| woodrim wrote: |
I have purchased this one and am hoping it is usable version...
|
I think it is. What's the extra ring in front of the lens? A screw-in lens cap?
_________________
Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Jup, a really solid one that is quite dangerous to the glass if hit by mistake. I rather remove it.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Although I haven't received the lens yet, my friend in Europe that collects my purchases and ships to me has sent me a sample picture. This from the Cyclops in the picture I posted previously. Shot with a Canon. I'm amazed to see virtually no CA.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Anyone know at what distance the Cyclops reaches infinity?
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3693
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Is that philosophical paradox ? Anyway if you refer to flange then it's about where every other M42. I am pretty sure it's also easily adjustable.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scheimpflug
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 1888
Location: New Zealand / USA
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scheimpflug wrote:
| Pancolart wrote: |
| woodrim wrote: |
| Anyone know at what distance the Cyclops reaches infinity? |
Is that philosophical paradox ? |
Perhaps! 
I have one of the "bad" versions... and the answer is:
"Right after you hear the mirror crack." 
_________________
Sigma DP1, Nikon D40 (hers ), Polaroid x530, Pentax P30t, Pentax P50, (P30t/P50 K-A to Nikon F body mount conversion)
Nikon: 18-55/3.5-5.6 "G ED II DX" (F) Soligor: 28/2.8 (FL->F converted), 135/3.5 (F), 3x TC (F, modified) Kalimar: 28-85/3.5 (F)
Vivitar: 70-210/2.8-4.0 Version 3 (F), Tele 500/6.3 Preset (F), 19/3.8 (F) Minolta: 300/5.6 (SR/MC/MD pending F conversion)
Tamron: 28/2.8 (Adaptall) Panagor: 28/2.5 (FD) Aetna: 300/5.6 (F) Osawa: MC 28/2.8 (F)
Vintage Lenses: Dallmeyer: 1940s A.M. 14in 356mm f4 (ULF->M42) 1930s Adon Telephoto Taylor, Taylor & Hobson: 1880s Rapid Rectilinear 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 11.31in f/8 (LF->?)
Parts Lenses: Nikon 35-135/3.5-4.5 (F), Sigma 70-210/4.5 (F), Nikon 50/1.8 Series E (F) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Okay, I either asked the question wrong or you guys are screwing with my head. My 28mm close focus hits infinity at about 10 feet; my 200mm at about 125 feet. Anytime I've tried to measure actual infinity, I've run out of room.
While we're at it, do you know the minimum focus distance of the Cyclops as well? I'm trying to suggest some distances to my friend who is holding my Cyclops so that I can see results of bokeh and focus depth. I'm too eager to wait until I have it. I'm very excited about the wide open (as if I had a choice) performance of the lens having no CA. I also may be playing with it some to determine if I can insert a fixed diaphragm at an ideal aperture - one that would provide the much needed depth while still maintaining the bokeh characteristics.
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Krisgage
Joined: 16 Mar 2009
Posts: 681
Location: Singapore
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Krisgage wrote:
I had been looking for this lens. Seem very very rare and do not pop up on the bay so often 
_________________
Photos and Lenses Journal
http://krisgage.livejournal.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
