Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Contax DISTAGON 3.5/15 C/Y -- any experience?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Manual Lenses
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
trifox



Level 2

Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 475
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:45 pm    Post subject: Contax DISTAGON 3.5/15 C/Y -- any experience? Reply with quote

HI there;;

Please, can some one specifiy the performance or capabilities or give some samples taken with this lens?

Is it good for architecture? Is it good for landscape?
What about DISTORTION?
Why is so expensive?

What about professional application...

ANY COMMENTS really appreciated....

thanks

tf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12545
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Contax DISTAGON 3.5/15 C/Y -- any experience? Reply with quote

trifox wrote:
HI there;;
Please, can some one specifiy the performance or capabilities or give some samples taken with this lens?


Here's two series I made with it:

http://www.oriofoto.net/temp/pcxs1-2007/index.html
www.oriofoto.net/temp/nevebw/index.html

Quote:
Is it good for architecture? Is it good for landscape?


It is good for everything, architecture, street photography, landscapes, even portraits.
If you look at my series above, you can see many shots with direct lights in and not a hint of flare, thanks to perfect coating.

Quote:
What about DISTORTION?


It is very well corrected, 2% in the edges

Quote:
Why is so expensive?


Is it really so expensive? there were two of them for sale at the last used camera fair I visited, both priced at 350 Euros.

Quote:
What about professional application...


I don't know, I'm just a photo dabbler.

Quote:
ANY COMMENTS really appreciated....


It is the lens that I love the most and the last one that I will ever sell.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16065
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

350 EUR is a gift price for this quality lens with this angle.
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
naplam



Level 2

Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 270
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
350 EUR is a gift price for this quality lens with this angle.

Yep, that's not expensive for a lens like that.
_________________
Gear: Canon EOS 400D, Yashica FX-70, Contax 139Q, Canon EF-M,
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 50mm f/1.7, MIR-1V 37mm f/2.8, Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f/2.4, Yashica ML 28mm f/2.8,
Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5 DC macro, Canon EF 100-300 f/4.5-5.6, Canon EF-S 18-55,

my flickr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sichko



Level 2

Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 379
Location: South West UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trifox - many thanks for the question which prompted Orio to point to his galleries. WOW!
_________________
John

Nikon D40x
Zenitar 2.8/16, Tokina 3.5/17, Arsat 2.8/20
Tamron 2.5/28
Mir 24N 2/35, Mir1 2.8/37, CZJ 2.4/35
Industar 50 3.5/50, Ind 50-2, 3.5/50, Helios 77M-4 1.8/50, Zenitar ME1 1.7/50, Ind 61/LZ 2.8/50, Volna 9 2.8/50
Helios 44x (44-2, 44M, 44M-4) 2/58
Jupiter 9 2/85, Volna 3 2.8/80, Vega 12 2.8/90
Jupiter 11A 4/135, Jupiter 37A 3.5/135, Tair 11A 2.8/135
Kaleinar 3b 2.8/150
Telear N 3.5/200, Soligor 3.5/200, Jupiter 21A 4/200
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
F16SUNSHINE



Level 4

Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 2671
Location: Anacortes Washington

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am confused .
TF are you asking about the 3.5/15 or 1.4/35?
The subject says 3.5/15 but you guys are discussing the 1.4/35 Confused

At EUR350 I would have taken either Very Happy

Beautiful series Orio. I remember this one well.
_________________
Current Kit
Canon 5D, 40D
Contax 4/18, 1.4/50, 1.4/85, 2.8/85, 2/100, 3.5/100, 2.8/180, Rollei HFT 1.4/35, 1.4/85, Zuiko 2/21, 2/24, 2/28, 2/35, 2/80, Yashica ML 3.5/21, 2.8/24, Helios 40 protype, Trioplan 2.8/100, Tair 11A,
Epson R D1(s), Bessa L, Bessa R2m, Leica CL, CV 4.5/15, 4/25, 1.4/40, Zeiss ZM 2/35, Yashinon1.8/50, CLE 4/90, Zeiss Opton 4/135 T, Electro GT, Electro GX, Electro CC
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trifox



Level 2

Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 475
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I am confused .
TF are you asking about the 3.5/15 or 1.4/35?
The subject says 3.5/15 but you guys are discussing the 1.4/35 Confused

At EUR350 I would have taken either Very Happy

Beautiful series Orio. I remember this one well.


F16SUNSHINE -- yep, I am asking for 3.5/15 -- propably the widest lens for Contax/Yashica mount...

here is MTF
http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B8B6F/EmbedTitelIntern/Distagon3.5_15mm_e/$File/Distagon3.5_15mm_e.pdf

and here is an ebay auction -- out of my pocket at this moment Smile
http://cgi.ebay.com/Contax-C-Y-Zeiss-Distagon-15mm-f3-5-15-3-5-AEG-Germany_W0QQitemZ140268924536QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item140268924536&_trkparms=72%3A570%7C39%3A1%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

one more thing - IT'S NON_FISH-EYE

thanks

tf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12545
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oops! Sorry Embarassed
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kds315*



Level 3

Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Weinheim/Germany

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Andy - I thought I had a bit too much Bordeaux tonite...

But honestly, the C/Y 3.5/15mm is a famous lens and Zeiss chief designer Prof. Glatzel did a fantastic job. Funny to notice that my friend Marco Cavina found out that the Pentax SMC 3.5/15mm was also designed (and later re-designed) be him!! Leitz also used his design for their Super Elmar-R 3.5/15mm, which was later superseded by a 2.8/15mm which was not based on a Zeiss design.

So if you plan on using it with a Canon EOS, a Pentax SMC 3.5/15mm + PK mount adaptor is a much more affordeable solution at about $1000.
_________________
Klaus

http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV diary
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
trifox



Level 2

Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 475
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kds315* wrote:
Thanks Andy - I thought I had a bit too much Bordeaux tonite...

But honestly, the C/Y 3.5/15mm is a famous lens and Zeiss chief designer Prof. Glatzel did a fantastic job. Funny to notice that my friend Marco Cavina found out that the Pentax SMC 3.5/15mm was also designed (and later re-designed) be him!! Leitz also used his design for their Super Elmar-R 3.5/15mm, which was later superseded by a 2.8/15mm which was not based on a Zeiss design.

So if you plan on using it with a Canon EOS, a Pentax SMC 3.5/15mm + PK mount adaptor is a much more affordeable solution at about $1000.


KLAUS many thanks!!! --

what main differcence can you see between these two lenses? Is it true that Pentax has an aspherical element and Distagon 15 doesn't?

So would you recommend Pentax for professional application?
Or save money for Distagon? I can not believe that Distagon has 0.15 m to infinity -- that must be a superb lens! Smile

cheers...

tf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trifox



Level 2

Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 475
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
Oops! Sorry Embarassed


no probs Orio Smile I think that Distagon 1.4/35 must a basic gear of professional photographer Smile

What do you think about Distagon 3.5/15? would you go for it? Smile

tf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kds315*



Level 3

Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Weinheim/Germany

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trifox wrote:
kds315* wrote:
Thanks Andy - I thought I had a bit too much Bordeaux tonite...

But honestly, the C/Y 3.5/15mm is a famous lens and Zeiss chief designer Prof. Glatzel did a fantastic job. Funny to notice that my friend Marco Cavina found out that the Pentax SMC 3.5/15mm was also designed (and later re-designed) be him!! Leitz also used his design for their Super Elmar-R 3.5/15mm, which was later superseded by a 2.8/15mm which was not based on a Zeiss design.

So if you plan on using it with a Canon EOS, a Pentax SMC 3.5/15mm + PK mount adaptor is a much more affordeable solution at about $1000.


KLAUS many thanks!!! --

what main differcence can you see between these two lenses? Is it true that Pentax has an aspherical element and Distagon 15 doesn't?

So would you recommend Pentax for professional application?
Or save money for Distagon? I can not believe that Distagon has 0.15 m to infinity -- that must be a superb lens! Smile

cheers...

tf


The first Pentax version was an aspherical design, later modified into a pure spherical version, sayed to be even better...

As a "Zeiss afficionado" I personally would go for the Contax version of course, but I have the Pentax SMC non-aspherical and I tested it against the new Canon 10-22mm and the result is excellent in favour of the Pentax! The Pentax can be had for EUR600 or so but the Zeiss is about EUR1000 MORE....

Did you see that here: http://forum.mflenses.com/fs-pentax-smc-3-5-15mm-wide-angle-t10876.html
_________________
Klaus

http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV diary
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
trifox



Level 2

Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 475
Location: UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
As a "Zeiss afficionado" I personally would go for the Contax version of course, .....................the Zeiss is about EUR1000 MORE....


AAARRRGGH the same problem again -- money and value !! Smile

thanks!

tf
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kds315*



Level 3

Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Location: Weinheim/Germany

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trifox wrote:
Quote:
As a "Zeiss afficionado" I personally would go for the Contax version of course, .....................the Zeiss is about EUR1000 MORE....


AAARRRGGH the same problem again -- money and value !! Smile

thanks!

tf


But I doubt that the performance difference is worth that amount!!
_________________
Klaus

http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV diary


Last edited by kds315* on Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12545
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

trifox wrote:

What do you think about Distagon 3.5/15? would you go for it? Smile
tf


I would love one but I can not afford it. Rolling Eyes
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Manual Lenses All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group