| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Lightshow
 Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3670 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I think it's a type II.
The aperture ring doesn't have the marks above the aperture numbers that the type 1 does.
The DOF scale looks like the type II not the type 1.
So a late type 1 with type II parts, or a type II with some type 1 parts, or a batch of type II with only meter markings... I'm inclined to think its the last two possibilities since the serial number seems to be for a type II, though the only way to know for sure is to open it up to see the elements. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calvin83
 Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7498 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| scsambrook wrote: |
Calvin83 writes The lens diagram above is for the Fujinon 5cm f1.2.
Thanks for the info Calvin83 ! Could you point me towards the source of your info so I can broaden my education still further, please? |
https://books.google.com/books?id=WV4zAQAAMAAJ&lpg=PA5&dq=Fujinon%2050mm&pg=PA5#v=onepage&q&f=false _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scsambrook
 Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2172 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
Many thanks, Calvin83  _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uhoh7
 Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1309 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2015 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
In today's dollars the Fuji was 2600 new! And that's about what one would cost today if you found a reasonable deal. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L*  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lightshow
 Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3670 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Quite pricy for sure, I settled for an f2 LTM Fuji. Nice lens, very well made, like most RF lenses.
I just realized I've hardly used it, must get out and shoot....  _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uhoh7
 Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1309 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2015 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
| Lightshow wrote: |
Quite pricy for sure, I settled for an f2 LTM Fuji. Nice lens, very well made, like most RF lenses.
I just realized I've hardly used it, must get out and shoot....  |
I think very very few were made of the superspeed, but I'd love to see some shots from your f/2  _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L*  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6006 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Reviving an old thread.
Did anyone ever find a schematic for the Canon 50mm f1.4 LTM that showed the 6 elements in four groups?
As everyone above has mentioned, the schematic that appears in this discussion thus far is of course incorrect
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiftyonepointsix
 Joined: 30 Apr 2017 Posts: 292
|
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix wrote:
Peter Kitchingman shows it as a classic 6 element/ 4 group double-Gauss. And I have taken several part and can verify that it is.
I seem to remember Neblette, "Photographic lenses", 1965 putting it in with the classic Planar 6/4 group.
https://www.canonrangefinder.org/Canon_50mm.htm
Shows as 6/4. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6006 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| fiftyonepointsix wrote: |
Peter Kitchingman shows it as a classic 6 element/ 4 group double-Gauss. And I have taken several part and can verify that it is.
I seem to remember Neblette, "Photographic lenses", 1965 putting it in with the classic Planar 6/4 group.
https://www.canonrangefinder.org/Canon_50mm.htm
Shows as 6/4. |
Many thanks
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|