View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dimitrygo
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
dimitrygo wrote:
CuriousOne wrote: |
Chinon 50/1.7 has a lot of internal mechanical similarities with Mamiya/Sekor 55/1.4, so they both were made by same factory and designed by same engineer, I believe. |
Based on your previous posts on this subject you are probably talking about 55mm and not 50mm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
The Chinon 50/1.9 thread reminded me of my Chinon 50/1.7 thread. I use this lens a lot. I also often use it with macro filters. For some reason, it works well for this.
Strait
with 2X macro filter
with Zykkor 0.42X Super Wide attachment.
_________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
2 more with the Auto Chinon 50mm, f1.7
+ bounce flash
_________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
Nikon Super Zoom-8 - when Super-8s were built like Uzis
Photo: Sony NEX-5N with Chinon 50mm, f1.7. Flash bounced off ceiling. _________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
One more, same set-up as previous photo. Push button black and white conversion via PhotoScape. _________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AstroZon
Joined: 13 Jul 2014 Posts: 172 Location: Colorado Springs
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AstroZon wrote:
3 more with the Chinon 50mm, f1.7:
_________________ My crazy Flickr group: Effected Cameras
https://www.flickr.com/groups/2538946@N23/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7785 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2015 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I like the Chinon 50 1.7, even though I rarely use it I still think it is a very good lens, nice colour rendition and plenty sharp.
Wide open at f1.7, ND6 filter, 1/2 sec exposure to blur the water, which was a horrible mucky brown, so I used a Silver Efex for B&W.
_________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
What optical scheme this lens utilized, double gauss? _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009 Posts: 826 Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
Astro,
Nice work on the sunflower pics - and congrats on the great find - that's a nice lens.
As has been stated on this site many times, it is very hard to find a really awful 50mm normal lens from the modern era. Many modern (post 1960s) faster normals are standard 5/6 Planar (Double Gauss) designs (see here: https://en.wiki2.org/wiki/Double-Gauss#/media/File:DoubleGauss1text.svg ), and if they are Japanese in origin, they probably share at least some common glass supply or component manufacturing features. Minor differences aside, IMHO, the performance of many Japanese normals from the great SLR era of the pre-digital age is going to be quite consistent, and quite excellent. Lucky for us, there are some minor differences for us to talk about and collect examples of!
Your comment that some lenses seem to perform better on digital than on film is interesting. I agree with your observation wholeheartedly and I think it is due to at least a number of factors aside from bad memory or subjective perception:
1) Many of us shoot digitally on crop bodies (APC) as well as full frame. Since the crop bodies only use the center portion of the lens circle, we get images from what is typically the "best performing" part of the lens. 35mm film cameras used a much larger portion of the image circle and included the edges of the images which are typically less sharp, and prone to distortion and vignetting.
2) Modern digital cameras have great image noise control, allowing us to shoot at higher ISO's than we did with our film cameras. This allows us to subsequently use smaller apertures for a given shutter speed, and again use the "best performing" middle apertures from the lens. it also lets us use faster shutter speeds which reduces camera shake and results in sharper looking images.
3) We often save and review our digital images as JPEGs, and even if we don't do any post processing, our cameras have. This could include white balance, sharpness, and contrast tweaks as a minimum. I feel these little tweaks are by and large more effective in producing consistently good looking images than anything we had in the days of film for standard machine (not custom) processing of prints.
4) Our use of chimping on digital cameras which allows us to take multiple shots of a scene and pick the best image at the time of exposure is something we could not have done in the days of film. Having more good images to pick from might lead us to perceive images from a particular lens as better than the images we took with it on film.
5) Modern digital cameras have evolved better and better exposure and focus systems over the years, and with only a few exceptions (Nikon, Leica, etc.), film camera technology for the masses pretty much stopped almost 20 years ago. So, by definition any comparisons we make to film images have to be based on images made with much older technology.
Your Chinon 50mm f/1.7 is certainly a fine lens as your images bear out and I agree that digital cameras have allowed us to really use some of these "forgotten" lenses to their best advantage.
Cheers!
Paul _________________ Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CuriousOne
Joined: 31 Dec 2013 Posts: 669 Location: Home
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2015 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CuriousOne wrote:
Well I also have Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.7,and it renders picture quite differently... _________________ I have nothing to compensate with lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2015 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
I have the Macro version of this lens that focuses at ~20 centimeters....I love it except it needs a good cleaning due to haze. Doesn't strike me as sharp as in your pictures but maybe after the cleaning I hope, or maybe I should stop only shooting wide open : )
Nice use of the lens though, good set of pictures. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|