 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
visualopsins


Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 3653 Location: California
Expire: 2013-01-05
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Orio wrote: | | visualopsins wrote: | | Scan loses more stops..... |
compare the church door in the DSLR copy and in the home scane
The home scan shows detail where the DSLR copy shows none. |
Thanks! That's pretty obvious. I agree with you, however, I think those shadow details are present in NEX photo raw; those details would be shown if the shadows were boosted in PP.
My answer was not specific to these examples, but in general -- scanners have less dynamic range than the NEX. _________________ ████████████████████████████████ like attracts like! ████████████████████████████████
http://visualopsins.weebly.com/
Cameras: Canon 5Dc, Spotmatics II, F, ESII, Pentax 6x7
Lenses: S-M-C Takumars 17-500mm (18 lenses), S-M-C Macro-Takumars 50 & 100mm, S-M-C Bellows Takumar, Macro-Takumar 50/4 1:1, S-M-C Takumars/6x7 55-200mm (7 lenses), Micro-Nikkor 55/3.5, Nikkor 200/4, Tamron SP 17/3.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|