Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Carl Zeiss Distagon 28mm f2 by our Orio
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Gallery
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16065
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:41 am    Post subject: Carl Zeiss Distagon 28mm f2 by our Orio Reply with quote

http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/carl_zeiss/contax_distagon_28mm_2_8/
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !


Last edited by Attila on Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:54 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
patrickh



Level 4

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 3576
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beautiful gallery Orio. That is a stunning lens - seems to have all the required virtues

patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D70 Nikon D200 Canon 40D
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, Nikkor 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 3004.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Kiron 28/2 Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Flektogon 35/2.4, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Arsat 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro,Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Jupiter 135/4, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8, 35/2.8
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12543
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

patrickh wrote:
Beautiful gallery Orio. That is a stunning lens - seems to have all the required virtues
patrickh


Yes. Of course it's not cheap. But not terribly expensive, either: a half way in between what you would spend for a Helios-40-2 and a Biotar 75.
If one is serious about wide angle photography, this is the lens to get.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7760
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
If one is serious about wide angle photography, this is the lens to get.


...if you have a full frame cam, that is.

But I agree, the optical quality of the lens is fantastic!
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12543
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
Orio wrote:
If one is serious about wide angle photography, this is the lens to get.


...if you have a full frame cam, that is.


Of course. But in a way, this comes without saying. A person who is serious about wide angle photography, always shoots with a full frame camera. If he can not afford a digital, then he uses a film camera. This is what I would do if I could not afford the 5D.
In fact, this is what I do anyway, because I still love shooting slides. A couple of months ago I bought a Contax 167 MT in perfect condition for only 60 Euros.
If you know the value of the 167 MT when it was new in the stores, you realize what great business the advent of digital makes possible with full frame film cameras.
Before the digital, I would have not been able to afford a 167 MT.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12543
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
A couple of months ago I bought a Contax 167 MT in perfect condition for only 60 Euros.


Another fancier possibility is to buy a EOS film camera and use all lenses (M42, Leica, Contax, Olympus, Nikon, Pentax etc.) with adapters.

The camera must be tested though. Some EOS film cameras don't like some adapters. For instance my EOS 50E works perfectly with the Leica adapters, but does not like much the Contax adapters, I don't know why. Sometimes it works with them, sometimes it gets stuck.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7760
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
... A couple of months ago I bought a Contax 167 MT in perfect condition for only 60 Euros.


Wow! An excellent price for a great cam!
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7760
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
...Another fancier possibility is to buy a EOS film camera and use all lenses (M42, Leica, Contax, Olympus, Nikon, Pentax etc.) with adapters...


That's what I do. Wink

Plus, I use a Zenit EM, a Ricoh KR10-x, an EXA I, a Nikon EM and a Canon FTb QL (for old Canon glass which cannot be used at any other cam).

But good (maybe even "serious") wide angle photography is also possible with a crop DSLR but then only with AF or very expensive MF lenses.
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12543
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:

But good (maybe even "serious") wide angle photography is also possible with a crop DSLR but then only with AF or very expensive MF lenses.


Yes, but although I know that Rick does not agree with me, I still think that shooting with a 12something mm lens on a crop body does not give the same result as shooting with a 20mm lens on a ff body - simply because it is impossible to give a 12mm lens (or zoom, even worse) the same degree or precision in distortion and corner quality that a 20mm lens can give.

Anyway, I think that we can agree that serious photography, is photography one is serious about Wink
Nothing more. Smile
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
patrickh



Level 4

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 3576
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Full frame, half frame, digital, film - doesn't matter. It's all in the eye of the shooter. I only do digital because the cost of the medium ceased to be an issue and I can now just blast away to my heart's content. On the other hand I love the MF lenses because (amongst other benefits such as quality) they make me stop and think about what I am looking at and what I am trying to do.
However, you slice it - that's a terrific lens Orio.
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D70 Nikon D200 Canon 40D
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, Nikkor 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 3004.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Kiron 28/2 Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Flektogon 35/2.4, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Arsat 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro,Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Jupiter 135/4, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8, 35/2.8
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poilu



Level 4

Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 3320
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Of course it's not cheap. But not terribly expensive


Crying or Very sad

Quote:
Carl Zeiss Contax Distagon 28mm f2.8 'Hollywood'


Hollywood is f2, not 2.8 Shocked Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16065
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oops, Embarassed fixed! Thanks!
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12543
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

poilu wrote:
Quote:
Of course it's not cheap. But not terribly expensive

Crying or Very sad


Why sad?
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Flor27



Level 3

Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 1197
Location: Paris, France

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry for that Up but how much would you attempt to pay for this Hollywood in C/Y mount ?

Thanks!
_________________
Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12543
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flor27 wrote:
Sorry for that Up but how much would you attempt to pay for this Hollywood in C/Y mount ?


Not more than 400-450 Euros, because there is now the new ZF version available which does not seem to have the slight problem with 5D mirror clear at infinite that the C/Y sometimes has (I say slight because it happens occasionally, and would probably be cured by a slight sandpapering of the lens bottom, which I don't have the courage to make).

However, I don't think that the 2/28 is a best buy with an APS-C camera, unless you plan in the future to move to a full frame, many of the main advantages of the 2/28 (corner performance and flare control wide open) are going to be insignificant on an APS-C camera, where the also excellent 2.8/28 can do the job almost as well - the only lesser point is the full aperture, which is a real loss because the 2/28 is perfectly sharp also wide open. But you have to decide if this stop faster is worth 200-300 Euros difference.

-
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Gallery All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group