| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 969
Location: France
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:36 pm Post subject: Canon 550D |
 |
|
New Canon : Eos 550D / Rebel T2i...
First samples here : http://www.dpreview.com/news/1002/10020806canoneos550d.asp
_________________
Olivier
DSLR : Canon EOS 40D - EOS 400D
SLR : Canon EOS 500N - ZENITH EM
M42 Lenses : Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.8/35 - Aus Jena Tessar 2.8/50 - Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 1Q 4/135 - Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar T 4/13,5 * Fujinon 1.8/55 * Helios-40 1.5/85 - Helios 44M 2/58 * Industar-61 L/Z-MC 2.8/50 macro * Jupiter-9 2/85 - Jupiter-37A 3.5/135 - Jupiter-21M 4/200 * Meyer Optik Görlitz Trioplan 2.8/100 - Meyer Optik Görlitz Orestegor 4/200 * MIR-1B 2.8/37 * Pentacon 2.8/29 - Pentacon 1.8/50 - Pentacon 2.8/135 * Piesker Picon 2.8/135 * Prinzflex 2.8/135 - Prinzflex 3.5/200 * Soligor 2.8/35 - Soligor 2.8/135 - Soligor 3.5/200 - Soligor 4.5/250 - Soligor 6.3/400 * Steinheil München Quinar 2.8/135 * Tair-11A 2.8/135 - Tair-3 Grand Prix Brussels 1958 4.5/300 - Tair-3 4.5/300A * Super Takumar 1.8/55 * Tamron AD2 (03A) 3.8-4/80-210 - Tamron AD2 (01A) SP 2.8-3.8/35-80mm * Will. Wetzlar Vastar V 2.8/50 * Yashinon 4.5/70-230mm * Zenitar-M MC 2.8/16 Fisheye + Zenit Extension Tubes Set - extender TK-2M
Nikon Mount : Angenieux 2.5-3.3/35-70mm - Angenieux 3.5/70-210mm
P6 Mount : CZJ MC Sonnar 4/300 * Volna-3 2.8/80
PK Mount : MC Cosinon-W 2.8/28 * Tokina 2.8/35-70
EOS AF Lenses : Canon EF 1.8/50 II - EF 2.8/100 USM Macro - EFS 4-5.6/17-85 IS USM - EFS 3.5-5.6/18-55 - EFS 4.5-5.6/55-200 - EF 4/70-200 L IS USM * Sigma 4-5.6/70-300 DG Macro - Sigma 3.8-5.6/28-200 + Extender Kenko Pro 300 1.4x
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 18143
Location: West Emilia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 4381
Location: Anacortes Washington
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe the MP race is really not over 
_________________
Jesus save me from your followers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
natebarnz
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:18 pm Post subject: 1.6x? |
|
|
Does anyone know if this is still a 1.6x crop?
_________________
Canon 500D
Rokkor 58/1.2 58/1.4 85/1.7
Nikkor 55/1.2 85/1.8
Helios 44-2 58/2, Meyer Oreston 50/1.8, Sears 55/1.4
Vivitar 19/3.8 28/2.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 18143
Location: West Emilia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008
Posts: 875
Location: Pearl of the Orient
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like it is going to be an interesting year ahead for the camera brands.
_________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna München Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 4381
Location: Anacortes Washington
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| my_photography wrote: | | Looks like it is going to be an interesting year ahead for the camera brands. |
yeah you nailed it . Fun times ahead for shooters
_________________
Jesus save me from your followers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 5618
Location: Greece
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
nice, gapless sensor and full hd video
phone are 8mp, p&s 14mp, dslr have to offer more
Canon sold 10 million lenses in the last 2 years
high tech for the mass, go on Canon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 447
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| poilu wrote: | nice, gapless sensor and full hd video
phone are 8mp, p&s 14mp, dslr have to offer more
Canon sold 10 million lenses in the last 2 years
high tech for the mass, go on Canon |
Yes, but when was the last time you needed more than 10MP?
_________________
Canon 20D / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10420
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ths 550 is the smaller version of the 7D. 
| Orio wrote: | | 18 megapixels in an APS-C sensor, that is insane. I am already getting noisy high ISO from the 50D which has 15 MP. |
That's what I usually say, Orio. But today I have shot with a good friend's 7D and I was abolutely amazed by it. Excellent handling, great built and fantastic images. Even at ISO1000 really low noise!
BTW, the 15-85 IS is an amazing lens. The best EF-S lens I have aver used!
Much, I mean, MUCH better than the EF-S 17-85 IS. Even way better than the Sigma 17-70. I have never seen any APS-sensor-lens that performes better than this new Canon, I have to admit.
_________________
"KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 5D, EOS 40D, EF/M, EOS 300, Spotmatic SPII, EXA 1c, Rollei 35XF, Minox 35 GL, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b, Kodak Retina Ia and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Meyer 1.9/58; CZJ 4/135 | Leica: Summicron 2.0/35; Summicron 2.0/50; Elmar 4/180 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;1.4/50;1.2/55;1.8/85; | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Steinheil 2.8/85; Will 4.5/105; Zeiss 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 1.4/50; | Rikenon: 35-70 | Rollei: 1.8/50, 80-200 | Russian: Peleng 3.5/8; Zenitar 2.8/16; Volna 2.8/50; Industar 3.5/50; Industar 3.5/5cm; Helios 2/58; Jupiter 2/85; Jupiter 3.5/135; RF: Jupiter 2.8/35; Jupiter 2/50 | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;60-300;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/135; 8/500 | Tokina: 28-85; 28-105 | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/28;2.5/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm |
Green is the gear I use the most. More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
AF-lenses: Canon: 1.8/50 | Sigma: 1.8/24; 28-105; 18-125 OS | Tokina: 12-24; 24-200; 28-70 | Tamron 80-210 | http://lucispictor.weebly.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009
Posts: 513
Location: Taiwan
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Three years from 400D -> 450D -> 500D -> 550D?? That's too much.
_________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 142
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently is has much better noise control than the 50d and 500d
I'm really interested but I don't think it has the micro AF adjust like the more expensive models, I would love this feature, you can tune the AF to each different lens you own to eliminate back and front focus.
If it had the AF adjust I would give it very serious consideration as a replacement to my 350D but I just cannot afford to go higher up in the range!
_________________
www.lensporn.blogspot.com
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 524
Location: Indiana, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| djmike wrote: | | Three years from 400D -> 450D -> 500D -> 550D?? That's too much. |
I agree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
magnet-2009
Joined: 22 Apr 2009
Posts: 481
Location: Greece, Athens
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The size of the sensor remains the same but the software [algorithm] is getting better and better, so it may be possible to get better high iso results using better analysis.
_________________
My flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 142
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed sometimes you can increase pixel density and still get better high iso results through better sensor design and software processing.
The 14mp Canon G10 has less noise at iso 400 than my old G3 has at iso 200 and the G3 only has 4mp!
_________________
www.lensporn.blogspot.com
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Rss feed
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
