View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Retro
Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 173 Location: Krautland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:55 am Post subject: bubbles... |
|
|
Retro wrote:
In an old manual for dealers of a photo-shop I read something about tiny bubbles in lenses. They state, that this bubbles would have no effect on the image quality. But avoiding them with better production techniques would rise the price enormously, and they would be only a matter of taste. I am ready to believe that. On the other side this is a statement of the prejudiced producer ("VEB = volkseigener Betrieb"). So what do you think?
Brauer, Egon. 1983. Foto Optik. Eine Warenkunde für den Fachverkäufer und den Fotoamateur. Leipzig: VEB Fachbuchverlag. Seite 29, "2.3.6. Luftblasen im Objektiv":
Quote: |
"... Luftbläschen im Objektiv bringen keine Funktionsstörung mit sich. Die Bläschen sind kleine Schönheitsfehler, die man im Interesse eines erschwinglichen Objektivpreises in Kauf nehmen muß...". |
_________________ Cameras: Sigma SA300 - Sigma SD9 - Sigma SD10
Lenses: Sigma 15-30/3.5-4.5 - Vivitar 28/2.5 - Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 - Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58/2.0 (black) - Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135/4 - Sigma 28-70/2.8 - Sigma 70-300/4.0-5.6 - Vivitar 28-210/3.5-5.6
Equipment: Lightmeter Gossen Lunasix - Tripod Linhof/Schiansky Kugelkopf-Panorama-Stativ, Modell 161 - Rightangle Viewfinder Minolta VN - B+W Greygradientfilter BWG 501 - B+W Circular-Pol-Filter 52E - Photo Bag Crumpler Ben's Pizza XL
Portfolio: http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/434323/default.aspx?_c02_vws=1/pc/pc?mypics=434323 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I think it depends on what you want to have...
...a perfect lens in collector's quality? The bubbles are bad!
...a perfect lens for professional shootings? The bubbles are perhaps problematic.
...a nice user-lens for "our" normal standards? Don't worry about the odd bubble. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
How to see those bubbles? do you need a microscope _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Retro
Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 173 Location: Krautland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Retro wrote:
@poilu:
Quote: |
How to see those bubbles? do you need a microscope |
I saw such bubbles (in a black biotar) a few month ago with my eyes and didn´t buy that lens because I estimated them as bad quality. I didn´t have the information I got recently from the mentioned book.
@LucisPictor:
Quote: |
...a perfect lens in collector's quality? The bubbles are bad! |
I fully agree.
Quote: |
...a perfect lens for professional shootings? The bubbles are perhaps problematic. |
That´s what the author of my book is denying. Far from this he states, that "...Besonders hochwertige optische Gläser weisen meist kleine Luftblasen auf, die während des Herstellungsprozesses entstehen...Technisch gesehen, haben die kleinen Luftblasen keinerlei nachhaltige Folgen. Sie sind, auch in ihrer Gesamtheit, viel zu klein, um einen sichtbaren Licht- oder Schärfeverlust zu bewirken...".
Freely translated and abbreviated for our "non-Krauts": "...this bubbles appear especially with the production of high quality lenses and have no negative effects whatever..." _________________ Cameras: Sigma SA300 - Sigma SD9 - Sigma SD10
Lenses: Sigma 15-30/3.5-4.5 - Vivitar 28/2.5 - Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 - Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58/2.0 (black) - Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135/4 - Sigma 28-70/2.8 - Sigma 70-300/4.0-5.6 - Vivitar 28-210/3.5-5.6
Equipment: Lightmeter Gossen Lunasix - Tripod Linhof/Schiansky Kugelkopf-Panorama-Stativ, Modell 161 - Rightangle Viewfinder Minolta VN - B+W Greygradientfilter BWG 501 - B+W Circular-Pol-Filter 52E - Photo Bag Crumpler Ben's Pizza XL
Portfolio: http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/434323/default.aspx?_c02_vws=1/pc/pc?mypics=434323 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bob955i
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
In practice, you won't see these bubbles on the end result, any more than you would see a speck of dust or even a scratch.
About the only things that will compromise a lens' optical performance are fungus that's not removed and a LOT of scratches.
I have an Orestor 135 with one bubble in the centre of one of the elements of the triplet - mount the lens on the camera and look through the viewfinder and one can no longer see the bubble.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I have some bubbles on the edges of one of my zuilko 24's (it has 3 scratches as well. The other zuiko 24 I have is mint with no bubbles. The image quality is exactly the same provided I use a hood against the scratches. Minolta has an M mount 28mm rokkor that is famous for it's perfectly patterned white spots visible behind the front element. Those white spots are little micro bubbles. These lenses function perfectly and still bring a fat dollar. It would seem that if there was a really foul bubble that was in the center of an element it would have gross negative effect . Otherwise minor one should be undetectable in photographs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Almost every Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 75mm f1.5 has bubbles! One of the best quality lens what I ever seen. With bubbles can be laser sharp at f1.5 ! They not impact picture quality at all in Biotar 75mm. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
The bubbles are not a concern for collectors, as they exist in some of the most collectible lenses.... they were unavoidable in some of the glasses used in the "exotic" high performance lenses of the 1930s and 40s and were something of a badge of rank. They become less common after WWII, but my 50/1.4 LTM Nikkor, 50/1.5 Zeiss Opton Sonnar and 85/2.0 LTM Jupiter-9, all from the early 1950s, still have them.
The presence of a bubble in the glass can never be an optical benefit, but in small numbers and being the size of a particle of dust, their presence was more than outweighed by the benefits of the glass that caused them to appear. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
rick_oleson wrote: |
their presence was more than outweighed by the benefits of the glass that caused them to appear. |
Thats a nice summary. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Perfectly put Rick!
Cheers, _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Retro
Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 173 Location: Krautland
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Retro wrote:
After a day of hard working I rewarded myself with this lens (black biotar 58/2), now knowing, that the bubbles are not a sign of bad quality:
First impressions: This lens is so sharp, that one needs a gun licence for it.
Poilu wanted to know, if one can see the bubbles with the mere eye. Yes. Here is a picture:
_________________ Cameras: Sigma SA300 - Sigma SD9 - Sigma SD10
Lenses: Sigma 15-30/3.5-4.5 - Vivitar 28/2.5 - Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 - Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58/2.0 (black) - Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135/4 - Sigma 28-70/2.8 - Sigma 70-300/4.0-5.6 - Vivitar 28-210/3.5-5.6
Equipment: Lightmeter Gossen Lunasix - Tripod Linhof/Schiansky Kugelkopf-Panorama-Stativ, Modell 161 - Rightangle Viewfinder Minolta VN - B+W Greygradientfilter BWG 501 - B+W Circular-Pol-Filter 52E - Photo Bag Crumpler Ben's Pizza XL
Portfolio: http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/434323/default.aspx?_c02_vws=1/pc/pc?mypics=434323 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maxim
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 284 Location: Poland 52°N 17°E
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maxim wrote:
Retro - what a great piece of glass! I love this lens and I'm dreaming about its bigger brother (Biotar 7.5cm). My copy of black Biotar (SN 3332409) also has some small bubbles - despite this fact it produces very sharp images I noticed some air bubbles in old Sonnars 18cm and Biotars.
The conclusion is: don't search microscopic bubbles - enjoy your lens! _________________ Regards,
Hubert
E-300 + ZD 14-42 + Tessar 5cm/3.5 + Mamiya 55/1.4 + Primoplan V 58/1.9 + Biotar 5.8cm/2 + MC Helios 44M-6 58/2 + Trioplan 100/2.8 + Trioplan V 100/2.8 + "Olympia" Sonnar 180/2.8 + ЮПИТЕР-6 180/2.8 + Telemegor 400/5.5
www.galeria.kw.pl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Retro
Joined: 02 Feb 2008 Posts: 173 Location: Krautland
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Retro wrote:
Here you get two pictures with this very nice lens from this evening:
Picture two was made under very low artificial light.
It is very harp, has very decent colors and a wonderful bokeh.
There was only few post processing needed, that means good output-contrast.
As you can see: forget the bubbles... _________________ Cameras: Sigma SA300 - Sigma SD9 - Sigma SD10
Lenses: Sigma 15-30/3.5-4.5 - Vivitar 28/2.5 - Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 - Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58/2.0 (black) - Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135/4 - Sigma 28-70/2.8 - Sigma 70-300/4.0-5.6 - Vivitar 28-210/3.5-5.6
Equipment: Lightmeter Gossen Lunasix - Tripod Linhof/Schiansky Kugelkopf-Panorama-Stativ, Modell 161 - Rightangle Viewfinder Minolta VN - B+W Greygradientfilter BWG 501 - B+W Circular-Pol-Filter 52E - Photo Bag Crumpler Ben's Pizza XL
Portfolio: http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/434323/default.aspx?_c02_vws=1/pc/pc?mypics=434323 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterm1
Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 224
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterm1 wrote:
About 10 years back when travelling in Hungary I bought a Fed 1 in a little antique shop somewhere behind Vaci Utca towards Doheny Utca. Nice shop but when I got the camera back to Oz (Australia) and examined it closely it was only then that I noticed that the lens looked like it was made of fizzy lemonade. I had examined the camera body itself carefully for function and appearance but being in a rush had not thought to examine the lens. I never got around to using it.
The point is that there is benefit in checking carefully. _________________ PeterM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6549 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
peterm1 wrote: |
About 10 years back when travelling in Hungary I bought a Fed 1 in a little antique shop somewhere behind Vaci Utca towards Doheny Utca. Nice shop but when I got the camera back to Oz (Australia) and examined it closely it was only then that I noticed that the lens looked like it was made of fizzy lemonade. I had examined the camera body itself carefully for function and appearance but being in a rush had not thought to examine the lens. I never got around to using it.
The point is that there is benefit in checking carefully. |
Probably a Lite edition _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop EU
http://www.fomafoto.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Dohany utca is jew district you will not find any trustworthy seller there Sorry about your disappointments.
http://www.jewishbudapest.hu/ _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|