View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:34 pm Post subject: "Broken Back" lenses |
|
|
guardian wrote:
The title is pretty lame. I don't really know how briefly to describe what I'm talking about, so I'll try to explain:
Not so much for shorter focal length MF lenses. But for longer focal length MF lenses which are physically on the long side, and especially for long MF zoom lenses:
I have several such lenses now with "broken backs". The lens, when fully extended, wobbles on its axis. If you hold both ends and try, you can wiggle the lens back and forth axially. Mounted on a camera body, the lens "droops" slightly. The section to section connection points of these lenses, which should be solid, are instead loose.
I hope that explanation is sufficiently clear. If so, I have two questions:
What event in the lens's past caused the "broken back"?
Was it perhaps caused by the lens having been mounted on a camera body which was dropped? If so, I can tell you I'm not finding any other indications of dropping on my "broken back" lenses.
Are "broken backs" caused by a manufacturing or design deficiency?
The "broken back" lenses I own arrived that way. I've not (so far, at least) ruined a previously-good lens by dropping it. So I'm at a loss to know what causes the "broken back" condition. I also have been at a loss to be able to repair any of my several lenses with this kind of damage.
Do you know what causes this "broken back" condition? Have you ever successfully repaired a lens in this condition? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what you are referring to but I had a wobbly lens on a rangefinder that was making the photos blurred, I found that the ring holding the rear element in was loose. I tightened it up and everythings perfect. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
Thanks. I realize what I am asking is not entirely clear. It's difficult to explain, but:
All lenses have some segmentation, or sectionalization, to them. Short focal length lenses have shorter segments. I've not encountered this on short f/l lenses.
The segments, or sections, of any lens in proper order connect smartly with adjoining segments. There is no looseness or "play" when the lens is right.
But I've brought in several lenses, all physically longer, where the segments are not tightly connected as they should be, or (I'm sure) as was the case when the lens was new.
Naturally I've looked at these lenses in hope of tightening them up. So far, at least, I've not been able to find a way to do that with any of them.
As I wrote in the OP, these are second hand lenses so I don't know what event gave rise to the loosening between segments or sections. If the lenses were dropped, perhaps there was stretching (i.e., bending) of a metal flange (internally), or something of that nature.
From the paucity of responses I have to conclude other MF lens fans are not running into this problem to the extent I am. Let me say:
I envy your good fortune!
I'm not proficient at disassembly and/or repair of the larger lenses. I'll most likely have to sacrifice one in an effort to get inside and (try to) discover what's going on. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
You explain it well, but if you haven't experienced something like that its a little hard to get your head round. Maybe that explains the lack of responses. Its been a quiet evening, perhaps when the Americans get on line there may be some replies.
The ring I'm referring to is a slotted ring round a lens element. The one I repaired was easy to see and reach, no opening up the lens to get at it.
Another thing you may look for are screws in the barrel, many are hidden under the grip. If the focus grip is rubbery material you ought to be able to lift it off or at least roll it back. There may be grubscrews that need tightening. Not rocket science and easily done by someone with good eyes and a pair of hands. And a mini screwdriver _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Can you focus through the lenses at all? _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
mo wrote: |
Can you focus through the lenses at all? |
Yes, quite easily. The broken lenses are functional and can be used to take photos. But with the looseness between sections, all the elements of the lens are no longer aligned on (what once was) the axis of the lens. I have at least three lenses suffering from this malady, all "longish" either long focal length prime or (longer f/l) zoom. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jaecarlos714
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 Posts: 17 Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
jaecarlos714 wrote:
I had a Vivitar 200mm with same issue. Problem was loose screws holding the barrel to base. Required complete disassembly to get to loose screws and tighten. Great learning experience and now I'm no longer afraid to take a lens apart. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Welcome jaecarlos714
I have seen:
Set screws around the barrel. (Most common in my experience)
Fixing screws inside the barrel.
Barrel segments that screw together. (Second most common) _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
jaecarlos714 wrote: |
I had a Vivitar 200mm with same issue. Problem was loose screws holding the barrel to base. Required complete disassembly to get to loose screws and tighten. Great learning experience and now I'm no longer afraid to take a lens apart. |
visualopsins wrote: |
Welcome jaecarlos714
I have seen:
Set screws around the barrel. (Most common in my experience)
Fixing screws inside the barrel.
Barrel segments that screw together. (Second most common) |
Thank you, guys. I appreciate the responses. I had feared some "complete disassembly" might be involved. I went for that with one of the lenses but was unable to accomplish the disassembly. To be honest, I was fortunate to get that lens back together!
Threads at the section intersections is also something I had considered. Can't say I've found any so far, but I need to pursue that possibility further.
Glue has been my biggest bug-a-boo when trying to disassemble lenses, and especially the longer ones. "When they're glued, I am screwed." Encountering glue as often as I have has somewhat spoiled by lens repair enjoyment. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: "Broken Back" lenses |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
guardian wrote: |
The lens, when fully extended, wobbles on its axis. If you hold both ends and try, you can wiggle the lens back and forth axially. Mounted on a camera body, the lens "droops" slightly. The section to section connection points of these lenses, which should be solid, are instead loose. |
The play is usually caused by the drying of the lubricant. One of the functions of the lubricant if to fill the clearances between the focusing helicoids. Relubricate the lens with new grease and the problem should be solved. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
norland
Joined: 10 Aug 2013 Posts: 165
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
norland wrote:
Discrepancy between the interlocking focus-threads is unlikely to be so severe as would cause the "broken back" symptoms.
I have a Yashica 300mm which has such a problem....
Indications are that some internal fastenings have come partly undone -- but its focus action is not at all sloppy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|