 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
trev

Joined: 30 Jun 2010 Posts: 398 Location: North Wales - UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:18 pm Post subject: B+W film |
|
|
In your humble opinion folks, which is the better B+W c41 process film? Due to ill health I cannot use chemicals so have to rely on the local minilab to process film.
Thanks _________________ Canon camera user.
eos d30., eos 5., eos 50E
A1x1, Ftbx1, eos 1n, Pentax
& ME super 1 each,
Samsung nx100 & nx10 1 each. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orio

Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29953 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know of many of them, only of Ilford's and Kodak's, possibly Kodak discontinued it (?). I don't know if Fuji makes one.
From my experience in the past (it's a long time since I used them), they deliver similar result. None of them was particularly notable
on contrast when I used them, you can make up for that when scanning.
If you use Photoshop, my suggestion is to stick with colour film and do the conversion digitally. You get much more flexibility that way. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trev

Joined: 30 Jun 2010 Posts: 398 Location: North Wales - UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, already use that method but was just considering a c41 B+W film. Guess I'll save my money & stick with colour print film. _________________ Canon camera user.
eos d30., eos 5., eos 50E
A1x1, Ftbx1, eos 1n, Pentax
& ME super 1 each,
Samsung nx100 & nx10 1 each. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skida

Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1307 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kodak BW400CN is still generally available and I found the results to be very good with decent contrast and low grain. Ilford XP2 is also easy to find, but I haven't used that one myself. Fuji Neopan 400CN is also C41. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
berraneck


Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 896 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the answer is simple - Ilford XP2 _________________ looking for Olympus XA-4! drop me a message if you know about one thanks!
equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lloydy


Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 3264 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila


Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 52475 Location: Budapest,Hungary
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Orio wrote: | I don't know of many of them, only of Ilford's and Kodak's, possibly Kodak discontinued it (?). I don't know if Fuji makes one.
From my experience in the past (it's a long time since I used them), they deliver similar result. None of them was particularly notable
on contrast when I used them, you can make up for that when scanning.
If you use Photoshop, my suggestion is to stick with colour film and do the conversion digitally. You get much more flexibility that way. |
+1 use silverfx _________________ Attila - admin --- BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic - FOMAPAN on forum - Webshop EU
Items on sale on Ebay
35mm: Konica A4, Konica IIIA, Konica FC-1
MF: Konica Pearl I,II,III 6x4,5 Konica Semi Pearl
Film: Foma,Kodak, Fuji DIY development C41, FOMA LQR
Scan: Epson V500, scanassist (http://www.scanassist.org)
Shutter tester: LCD tester from member vfmoto
Digital: Panasonic G1, Sony Nex-3, Samsung NX100
Lenses: Konica Hexanons,Carl Zeiss,Carl Zeiss Jena,Meyer-Optik,Minolta MD,Yashica ML,Nikon,Olympus OM
DIY E-6,C41 and B&W
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martinsmith99


Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6550 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Attila wrote: | | Orio wrote: | I don't know of many of them, only of Ilford's and Kodak's, possibly Kodak discontinued it (?). I don't know if Fuji makes one.
From my experience in the past (it's a long time since I used them), they deliver similar result. None of them was particularly notable
on contrast when I used them, you can make up for that when scanning.
If you use Photoshop, my suggestion is to stick with colour film and do the conversion digitally. You get much more flexibility that way. |
+1 use silverfx |
+2 _________________ Martin - Moderator
MF Lenses User Real Names (add yours)
MF Lenses User Self Pics (add yours)
Gear: Canon EOS 5Dmkii, EOS 50 & 620, T90, AE-1 SLRs, FED2, Zorki6 & Canonette QL17 Giii RFs and stacks of lenses
ms-imaging
My Blog
My Flickr
Old Lens Fanatics Facebook Group |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ForenSeil


Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 1930 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Koda BW400CN gets a lot better when you overxpose it a little bye the way. It's more ISO250 or ISO300 in my opinion. _________________ Cameras in active use: IR/UV modified NEX-5N+EVF, NEX-C3, Pentax Q, Minolta XG9, Moskva 5 6x6 Rangefinder
Lenses in active use:
MF
Samyang 8/2.8 E-Mount, Docter-Optics Olympus 100x 1.25 finite macro lens, Tevidon 16/1.8, Tominon 17/4 (10x Macro), CZJ Tevidon 25/1.4, Novoflex Macro-Noflexar 35/3.5, Minolta MD 50/1.4, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Samyang 85/1.4, Rodagon 105/5.6, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Novoflex 400/5.6, Celestron 500mm F3.6, Novoflex 600/8
AF:
Sigma 19mm F2.8 E-Mount, Sony SEL50F18
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|