| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 12:37 pm Post subject: Auto Rikenon 55mm f1.4? |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
Does anybody here have experience with the Auto Rikenon 55mm f1.4?
According to m42artlimited it is identical with the 55mm f1.4 Mamiya Auto Mamiya/Sekor, & Yashica /Yashinon lenses.
Takumar 55mm f1.8 are readily and cheaply available here, but I wonder if I should give the Rikenon a try.
cheers,
Andreas _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
montecarlo
 Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1865 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
montecarlo wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/carpents/nlsr1m7
http://www.pbase.com/carpents/nlsr2m11  _________________ Canonet QL17 III
Zenit E , Helios-44 58mm f:2.0 , Tair-11A 135mm f:2.8, Jupiter-9 85mm f:2.0,
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f:2.4
Pentax MX, ME Super, Chinon CE4/CM4, Petri MC 28mm f:2, smc Pentax-M 50mm f:1.7, Soligor T 135mm f:2.8
Minolta X500, Tokina 28/2.8, Rokkor 50/1.7, 80-205/4.5
Nikon D90, Nikkor 35/2.0, Nikkor 50/1.8, Sigma 24/2.8, Nikkor 18-105 VR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voytek
 Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 891
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
Takumar 55mm f1.8 - not, but Takumar 1.4/50 - yes. In my opinion.
Rikonen 1.4/55 is really very good lens. Pretty sharp wide open with nice bokeh.
But for me the best performers are cosinon 1.8/50 and....
cosinon 1.4/55
 _________________ Cheers, Voytek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57939 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
YES! Very , very nice! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zewrak
 Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1193
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
Oi, don't disrespect Super Takumar 55mm f/1.8. Considering it's price it is well worth getting. I picked one up the other day for £10. Well worth it in my opinion. I would post some shots, but the M42 adapter is hidden somewhere . _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
patrickh
 Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8572 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Voytek
Great samples.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voytek
 Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 891
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
I don't. I wrote: "in my opinion". Maybe I had not perfect one. The 1.8/55. It is often that 2 lenses the same brand, with the same parameters are no equal regarding performance. I have two S.Takumars 1.4/50 and both are very good. _________________ Cheers, Voytek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
luisalegria
 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
That lens (Rikenon/Mamiya-Sekor/Yashinon) is reputed to be a Tomioka.
I have the same, with the Sears brand, which was probably licensed via Ricoh or Mamiya.
Very worthwhile I think, and you can probably get it cheap.
Theres no reason not to have a bunch of 50mm's at the prices they are going for. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Puplet
 Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Puplet wrote:
I had one last year and liked it:
http://forum.mflenses.com/rikenon-55mm-f1-4-t2459,highlight,rikenon.html
Good if you can find a cheap one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Farside
 Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6552 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
Hah! I've just referenced that thread in Film Cameras - An Unexpected Nikon. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop EU
http://www.fomafoto.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
wow, thank you so much everybody for your replies!
montecalro - often I had posted the same link, even in this forum, but I was not aware that the sears it the same lens!
great samples voytek, they look very good!
luise already I have a few 50mm: the Pentak M50mm f2, the SuperTak 50mm f1.4 and the S.M.C. Macro Tak 50mm f4. I'd think that 55mm on a x1.5 dSLR could be very attractive for portraits, though the Rikenon may be too sharp for that?
The Super Tak by far is my fastest lens which often comes in handy, but it so very often flares heavily. Well, I am not sure if it is called flaring really, but often images have very weird reflections all over the frame which make the whole image look out of focus - and that not only during day, sometimes even at low light. That makes me think that using a hood alone would not solve the problem, but that my lens might not be too good, that these reflections could be caused by the fungus the lens also has?
- Thus my desire for an other 50ish lens with f1.4...though I guess I shall get a S.M.C. Takumar 50mm f1.4 along the road also.
The Rikenon I found is offered in a japanese auction, it at stands at 9 USD starting price. I may try to get it!
cheers,
Andreas _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zewrak
 Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1193
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
Super Takumar 55mm f/1.8 wide open.
More shots and full sizes at http://www.flickr.com/photos/zewrak/sets/72157605655878002/
All unedited, shot in raw. Only converted to JPEG. _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
wow Daniel, these are very nice photos indeed, great for wide open!
It seems that you just newly opened your flickr account, I hope there will be many more photos taken with manual lenses soon!
May I ask, do you also have any other 50/55mm, any other 50mm Takumar? And if so, how you think they compare? _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zewrak
 Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1193
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
| kuuan wrote: |
wow Daniel, these are very nice photos indeed, great for wide open!
It seems that you just newly opened your flickr account, I hope there will be many more photos taken with manual lenses soon!
May I ask, do you also have any other 50/55mm, any other 50mm Takumar? And if so, how you think they compare? |
No 50mm Takumar, yet. I got Super Takumar 20mm, 35mm, 55mm, 135mm, 150mm and S-M-C Takumar 300mm. My 50's are Meyers.
I am working on extending the Manuals on flickr. Just takes time, which I don't have as much as I'd want. _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard_D
 Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2378 Location: Faversham Kent UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Richard_D wrote:
Great shots in this thread. _________________ Richard
The interesting bit:
Nikkors: 20mm f2.8 AIS, 24mm f2.8 AIS, 28mm f2.8 AIS, 35mm f2 AIS, 50mm f1.4 AI, 50mm f1.48AI, 50m f2 AI,
55mm f3.5 AI'd, 105mm f4 AI, 135mm f2.8 AI'd, 135mm f3.5 AI'd, 200mm f4 AI'd .
Nikon E Series: 100mm f2.8 .
Soviet Nikon Mount: Zenitar 16mm f2.8, Arsat/arax/photex 85mm T&S f2.8 .
Other: Asahi Super Takumar 55 mm f2 (M42) ,Tamron 300mm f5.6 SP, Tamron 500mm f8 SP.
DSLR: Nikon D700. 35mm SLRsNikon FE, Pentax S1a.
TLR: Rolliecord II.
Sub-Minature: Pentax Auto 110, 18mm f2.8, 24mm f2.8, 50mm f2.8.
More to come... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
voytek
 Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 891
|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
voytek wrote:
Very nice pictures with Takumar _________________ Cheers, Voytek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuuan
 Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4588 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:46 pm Post subject: no Rikenon but an S.M.C. Tak |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
lost the bid for the Rikenon, it was sold for 35 USD ( just over my maximum bid )
but was in luck today, found a S.M.C. Takumar 50mm f1.4 in good condition for just 20 USD.
I am very happy about this lens because my Super Takumar 50mm f1.4 often renderes crazy blurriness, I suppose caused by in lens reflections.
I hope this won't happen as much with the S.M.C.
I also noticed that these two lenses are not identical in construction: The S.M.C. is deeper ( bigger ) and it has 8 aperture blades whereas the Super Tak only has 6.
cheers,
Andreas _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|