Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
These show off the lens' abilities very nicely.
Some of my best images have been taken around our home as well, so it isn't necessary to go far to see photographic opportuniyies.
Thanks for these.
OH |
Thank you. i have not used this lens very much, but it is nice. I found it to glow wide open in some situations,
but stopped down it is pretty good. |
Almost all mamiya's normal lenses are very good images taker.
The 50/2 is inside them.
I don´t know why some of us prefer another lenses less good than the mamiyas. I'm one.
I use now my summicron R last version, and I have to say that my mamiya 2/50 has less contrast but it's on pair in sharpness.
At F/5,6 both produce great images.
Your post made me think about this question one more time.
I understand that the SX version is the best (specially in the 55/1,8 lens).
It has a scheme of 6/5 from the last version of the M42 one.
The oldest had 6/4 like the 2/50.
In one article of the old shutterbug, the SX 1,8/55's center definition was qualified as excellent (in pair with the planar and the SMC takumar 1,8/55).
Enjoy your very good lens!!! |