Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

aperture position on a projector lens
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 3:15 pm    Post subject: aperture position on a projector lens Reply with quote

I have been toying with the idea of building my own 50mm 1.2 lens from a projector lens, I first got a bell and Howell lens but realised it would be too difficult with its registration distance being so short so I managed to find an Eiki 50mm that has a construction and registration distance that I could work with.

don't get me wrong I have very little knowledge of lens construction and I take average at best photos but I really enjoy converting lenses........more than actual photography oddly enough!!

I really want to do a good job on this and i need some help with understanding aperture positioning in a lens, Ian posted a very very nice conversion job he did on a 90mm projector lens a short time back with a built in aperture system but my knowledge of lens construction is dismal so I need to learn.

many thanks in advance
Craig


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry for bringing up an old thread but I'm hoping someone could help me out with the project I'm doing.

So I have already started the project and I'm using a nikon 50mm 1.8 lens to create a helicoid but I want to also add an aperture system to it.

With the positioning of the helix and how close the lens will be to the sensor it leave only one position to place it but I'm a bit worried that it will act more like a choke than a proper aperture system.

Here's a diagram of how the lens is constructed

the first line on the diagram after the first 2 elements is where I could place the aperture system but I suspect the second set of lines after the 3rd element would be the ideal positioning as it is where I would suspect the axis would be.

any help would be appreciated




the photo is from MIR for the canon fl 35mm 3.5 but it shows the same basic layout of the lens groups


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have also modded an projector lens, but it's design was pancolar-style, so I've placed aperture where pancolar lens have it. You better look for lens designs online, and find similar or close to your design, and adopt aperture location from there.


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 10:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

agreed, I looked through quite a few designs but most 6 element designed lenses dont have the same layout, the third element is in most cases closer to the first 2 elements and then the aperture system would be placed after the third element.

from what I read about aperture placement is that they normally position the aperture by the axis as it is the smallest area to cover and therefore makes the lens design as small as possible,

Tried to research the type of lens design the eiki is but didnt come up with much


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The designs you mention appear to be double gauss ones.

Regarding the aperture placement, I have Tamron Adaptall 135/2.8 It has aperture at very end, there are no more lens after it, directly goes to film plane (it do has protective glass, but it does nothing to optics, it's flat).


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the heads up, after looking I think you are correct in stating that it is a double gauss design, having a look through a Couple of designs and most of them have the aperture system after the 3rd element.

there are a few exceptions such as the UV-Planar 60mm f/4 and Olympus 25mm 2.8 so I think I will go ahead and do the placement after the second element.

I was thinking about just leaving the aperture out but the lens seems to give an interesting petzvalish type effect so I'm more tempted to put the aperture in to see the results stopped down as it also glows quite a bit


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can try to make aperture of various shapes, will give more interesting effect. And I'll disclose a "secret" - if you make aperture of semitransparent, non-refractive material, and it will be thicker (darker) at edges, than you'll get the famous Smoot Transition Focus effect.


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you use disks you can have interesting shapes like this from a Fuji 85mm soft focus lens.


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I might just do that rather then I can just place it at the rear.

Lightsnow that looks pretty trippy Shocked i cant really imagine what effect it would give to the images??


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 4:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just cut rough discs out of cardboard, black if I've got it - if I haven't I just blacken it with a marker pen. It's all I need to just try a projector lens. Get a cheap protractor, the sort kids use at school with a pencil, and mark out different size discs. then hack away with scissors. Wink


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 4:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

These perphorated aperture discs, when filming video, produce a set of rolling highlights, which "roll" around the circle outline, formed by distance and curvature. Hard to spell, better check youtube videos.


PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lloydy wrote:
I just cut rough discs out of cardboard, black if I've got it - if I haven't I just blacken it with a marker pen. It's all I need to just try a projector lens. Get a cheap protractor, the sort kids use at school with a pencil, and mark out different size discs. then hack away with scissors. Wink


haha I think I might just do that, going to test to see if the aperture placement will work on the lens first by trying it out with a cut out piece.


PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Layer-cake wrote:
Lloydy wrote:
I just cut rough discs out of cardboard, black if I've got it - if I haven't I just blacken it with a marker pen. It's all I need to just try a projector lens. Get a cheap protractor, the sort kids use at school with a pencil, and mark out different size discs. then hack away with scissors. Wink


haha I think I might just do that, going to test to see if the aperture placement will work on the lens first by trying it out with a cut out piece.


I know this is an old thread but it's very relevant for some of my current projects.

I've used paper apertures in-front of several lenses in the past (often for shaped bokeh), but expect it to be a bit of a pain for DOF control. So I've splashed out in a large IRIS which varies from ~50mm open diameter to 2mm. I'm hoping to mount this in front of my projector lenses using a combination of stepping rings & cokin P adapter plates. The cokin plates give backwards filter threads & a large disc that's easily stuck onto oddball lenses, just a shame they're male threads.
Whilst I'm waiting for the stepping ring to stick on my iris how much success has there been with front mounted apertures?

On of my trio of quality projectors has very little rear clearance I had to trim some excess metalwork to get infinity focus on MFT, so no room for an aperture behind that one!

Here's a quick shot of the 45mm perspective control lens with a filter thread added (more or less centered around the optics - the front edge of the housing is VERY off center)
P1310863 by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr


PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not an optical designer, I think that the further away from the optical center an iris is, that it's more likely to cause vignetting when you stop down.
The optical center would /generally be at the center of the onion ((|)), though many lenses are not symmetrical these days, but there does seem to be a change in the elements past that point.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lightshow wrote:
I'm not an optical designer, I think that the further away from the optical center an iris is, that it's more likely to cause vignetting when you stop down.
The optical center would /generally be at the center of the onion ((|)), though many lenses are not symmetrical these days, but there does seem to be a change in the elements past that point.

When I've tried waterhouse stops just in front of the lens in the past I've got away with it.
Hopefully will with the Iris here as getting to the center of these is not practical