Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Any idea what mount this could have?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:55 pm    Post subject: Any idea what mount this could have? Reply with quote

I won a Carl Zeiss Jena 135/2.8 from ebay not knowing what mount it was. I decided to bid anyway because I got it pretty cheap.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=260265166131

What mount could it be?

I also won this lens from the same seller:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=260265173069

Overall pretty satisfied with the price.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

First has Praktica bajonet mount. You can use on olympus 4/3 cameras with a special adapter.

Second is a nice lens I have it.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
First has Praktica bajonet mount. You can use on olympus 4/3 cameras with a special adapter.

Second is a nice lens I have it.

Thing is I don't have an Olympus. Guess I have to sell it...


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Praktica B and Pentax K are almost the same. I have modified a pentax adapter and the praktica fits. I used a pentax to olympus adapter. took it apart and sanded the pentax part. It is a little bit to thick for the praktica, but for the rest it looks the same.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gerrit wrote:
Praktica B and Pentax K are almost the same. I have modified a pentax adapter and the praktica fits. I used a pentax to olympus adapter. took it apart and sanded the pentax part. It is a little bit to thick for the praktica, but for the rest it looks the same.

I don't know, is it worth the effort? I might just sell this and buy a Carl Zeiss Jena 135/3.5 instead which I hear is also good.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Mazero"]
Gerrit wrote:
I might just sell this and buy a Carl Zeiss Jena 135/3.5 instead which I hear is also good.


This is the right solution , 135/3.5 better lens.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is a CZJ PB-mount one, some like it because of its Bokeh and it was
made by Meyer not CZJ, although its brand name is under CZJ Prakticar.
Optically CZJ 135/3.5 is better one IMHO.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
This is the right solution , 135/3.5 better lens.

Ah well, bummer... I guess I'll just put it up for sale and hopefully get my money back. At least the other lens fits and is quite good.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Allow me another advice take an M42 version of Pentacon 135mm f2.8 or Meyer 135mm lens as Koji said this lens a bokeh monster , really ,really good one also. I love both.


PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
Allow me another advice take an M42 version of Pentacon 135mm f2.8 or Meyer 135mm lens as Koji said this lens a bokeh monster , really ,really good one also. I love both.

Thanks for the advice. I've been looking for a Pentacon 135/2.8 the last few days but the ones I've watched have gone a little too expensive for my taste.


PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mazero wrote:
Attila wrote:
Allow me another advice take an M42 version of Pentacon 135mm f2.8 or Meyer 135mm lens as Koji said this lens a bokeh monster , really ,really good one also. I love both.

Thanks for the advice. I've been looking for a Pentacon 135/2.8 the last few days but the ones I've watched have gone a little too expensive for my taste.

Try and make sure you get the Meyer Orestor or the older barrel-shaped pre-set Pentagon version with 15 blade diaphragm. The newer auto version with parallel sides and 6 blade diaphragm is not as nice.