Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Amazing B&W portraiture
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Art Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Farside



Level 3

Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 1864
Location: Ireland

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

patrickh wrote:
She kept ill-advised company.


She didn't have a crystal ball and neither did many others at the time. Like so many artists, engineers, designers in Germany of the 20s and 30s the situation was changing around them and they stuck it out because that was their home. By the time they realised war was inevitable it was too late for most of them to get out, and many of them bought the lies they were fed by the leadership.

Werner von Braun is a good example of this. His only real interest in life was in developing rockets for an eventual journey into space and to that end would have joined up to anything that allowed him to carry on his work, including the Nazi Party and the SS. The war was nothing more than a gigantic opportunity for him, as was being recruited by the Americans.

The man was thoroughly amoral and naive in that respect.

I think Leni Riefenstahl was too. In a way, it's a shame she became so well-known for just that one film - if not for that, she might have been more acceptable to a post-war European and American public.
_________________
Dave

The Lenses of Farside

"The largest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and
prosperity is no longer socialism. It is, instead, the ambitious,
arrogant, unscrupulous ideology of environmentalism."

-- Czech President Vaclav Klaus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7760
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi!

I do not want to trigger another political discussion here, defintely not.
Just let me put it that way: I understand and respect your reflected opinion completely, Orio.
But I ask you to understand my resentments towards her as well. I can accept that she was ahead of her time as far as photography is concerned, but I cannot - and as I said that might be caused by the fact that I am German - accept anybody who was colaborating with the Nazi regime - and even more if this person never has admitted and regretted it (Riefenstahl has always refused to admit that).
Can we agree here not to agree?
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12541
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
Hi!
I do not want to trigger another political discussion here, defintely not.


But this is what you are doing: by judging an artists for her alleged political opinions (I say alleged, because as far as I could search about her, she was not a member of the party), you are shifting what was my purely aesthetical comment, onto the political debate.

Let me point you to this link:
http://www.thesportjournal.org/2001Journal/fall/olympia.htm
Where the work of Riefenstahl is commented with a bit more insight than a simple drastic refusal of her work.
Let me quote a part of it:

Quote:
The objectivity that many perceive in "Olympia" is primarily a result of Leni Riefenstahl's refusal to compromise her film production standards with the wishes of others. Riefenstahl extended control over all aspects of the film's creation (Hinton, 1991, p. 79). Throughout the filming, editing, and production in general, the Minister of Propaganda, Dr. Joseph Goebbels frequently pressured Riefenstahl to modify the film in ways that supported Nazi ideals. Aware that Hitler resented successful African-American athletes, and against Goebbel's demands, Riefenstahl featured two highly successful African-American athletes: gold medal winning Jesse Owens and Ralph Metcalf (Hinton, 1978, p. 81; Infield, 1976, p. 137). Riefenstahl's resistance to comply with such a high figures in the Nazi regime leads credence to her claim that the film was not produced for propaganda purposes. Also supportive of Riefenstahl's uncompromising ways as a producer of "Olympia" were arguments by Nazi officials that the film was too artistic (Berg-Pan, 1980, p. 102). Finally, somewhat favorable to Riefenstahl's claims that "Olympia" was not a Nazi propaganda film was that, following the war, de-Nazification courts determined that she was not a Nazi (Salkeld, 1996, p. 229).


LucisPictor wrote:
Just let me put it that way: I understand and respect your reflected opinion completely, Orio.
But I ask you to understand my resentments towards her as well.


I can understand your resentment against a political regime. I can not understand, let alone approve, your choice of censoring an artist for the reasons that you bring (or for any reason, for that matter).

I would feel the need to state what I think of this boycotting of an artist for his/her alleged political opinions, but if I did, I would risk to be offensive, so I refrain.

If everyone would reason like you do, the Futurism would disappear from all art museum, as it was an artistic movement that was born in Italy and supported both war and the Fascist regime.
So, we would not be able to admire any more artists like Balla, Boccioni, Severini.

And what should we do with the Colosseum in Rome? Probably the hugest human slaughter-house ever built.
So... let's tear it down?

Thanks God, the directors of museums reason differently. Following your logic, with every change of political leadership, this or that artist would disappear from the galleries, to a point where they would be left empty.

-
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7760
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
... and even more if this person never has admitted and regretted it (Riefenstahl has always refused to admit that).

Can you see my point?

My granddad fought for the German "Wehrmacht" in WWII, but he admitted that he made many mistakes, e.g. not to fight against the regime. That's fine with me. I do not accuse my granddad.
Riefenstahl has never conceded that she worked for the Nazis, although many researchers have proven the opposite. That's the problem.
If somebody admits a mistake, I will forgive. If not, I will not forget...

I am very thin-skinned when it comes to Nazis.

And sorry, I do not want to continue this discussion. We will not agree. I don't mind.
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12541
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:

Can you see my point?


No, I can't. What you write has nothing to do with art.
I made an aesthetical comment about a photography, and what you came up with is this political soup. What has this to do with the arts?

Quote:
My granddad fought for the German "Wehrmacht" in WWII, but he admitted that he made many mistakes, e.g. not to fight against the regime. That's fine with me. I do not accuse my granddad.
Riefenstahl has never conceded that she worked for the Nazis, although many researchers have proven the opposite. That's the problem.
If somebody admits a mistake, I will forgive. If not, I will not forget...


What has this to do with art?
The father of my mother was a fascist. The father of my father, was an anti-fascist, and one of my father's brothers was killed by the Germans.
And what has all this to do with the arts?
Nothing! Thanks God.

Quote:

I am very thin-skinned when it comes to Nazis.


You are censoring arts exactly like they did. Are you able to see that?

Quote:
And sorry, I do not want to continue this discussion. We will not agree. I don't mind.


You don't mind?
Thanks. Very kind of you.
OK, so I won't mind either. And since you don't mind, I will let you know what I think of boycotting artists for their political opinions: I think it is XXXXXXXXXXXX

I censor myself

Orio
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7760
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I understand you and you certainly have a point, but I will not change my attitude toward Nazi collaborators who did not regret. As I said this is a very special case.

But obviously, you do not want to understand what I try to express.

Orio wrote:
...you came up with is this political soup.

Can I just ask you to to deal fairly and not depreciate personal opinions? This I don't know from you.

P.S.: I am out of this thread.
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS 50e, EOS 500, Spotmatic SPII, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;3.5/135;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: CZJ Flek 4/20; Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; MIR38 3.5/65; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12541
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:

Orio wrote:
...you came up with is this political soup.

Can I just ask you to to deal fairly and not depreciate personal opinions? This I don't know from you.


I don't find my expression to be depreciative, just colourful. If you perceived it as depreciative, it was not meant, I apologize. What I wanted to point out is that I made a merely AESTHETICAL comment on a photographer, and I was replied with political comments.

Which is ok for me but please don't blame it on me or anyone else if you shifted an aesthetical thread over to a political one!

-
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12541
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Farside wrote:

The man was thoroughly amoral and naive in that respect.
I think Leni Riefenstahl was too. In a way, it's a shame she became so well-known for just that one film - if not for that, she might have been more acceptable to a post-war European and American public.


Leni Riefenstahl was an artist. One with undeniable talent. One may like her style or not, but this is another matter.
The corpus of her artistic work demands and deserves to be judged for it's artistic value, a right that must be granted to all artists, regardless of their opinions, faith, aaa preferences or any other ideological structure.

Was she appreciative of the Nazi regime? It is possible, actually quite probable. Many millions of Germans were, she would surely be not a white fly in that.
Or was she just a young and basically unaware ambitious artist who saw in the admiration Hitler had for her, an unhoped-for possibility to make movies with a lot of funds, to be able to work without any financial restraint?
I lean over this second hypothesis, but neither this one or the previous one should be a concern when evaluating arts.

As for her life, I don't think it should be a concern when evaluating the artworks. But for those who are concerned, there was a trial, and she was cleared of all nazi accusations by the same kind of courts that sent to death penalty the likes of Goering, Ribbentrop and other nazi generals.

Lesson to learn? This one: next time I will make an artistic comment on a photographer, it seems I'll be better previously submitting it to the Committee for Ethical Approval.

-
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16065
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:

My granddad fought for the German "Wehrmacht" in WWII, but he admitted that he made many mistakes, e.g. not to fight against the regime. That's fine with me. I do not accuse my granddad.


You must be proud about him and your nation, he didn't made any mistake.His leadership made mistakes not an individual soldier.I am proud Hungarian and I not prod about all are politician, this is true for the past and for present.
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Attila



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 16065
Location: Budapest,Hungary

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:

Lesson to learn? This one: next time I will make an artistic comment on a photographer, it seems I'll be better previously submitting it to the Committee for Ethical Approval.


This is one of few places what is not censored by long noses Smile even if they try all time.
_________________

Olympus E-1,Bessa L,Bessa RF,Olympus OM2n,Nikon FA,Yashica Eletro 35 GN,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Zeiss Jena:Flektogon 2.8/20mm,4/25mm,2.4/35,2.8/65mm,4.5/4cm Tessar, 8/500mm Fernobjektiv
Pancolar 1.4/55mm,1.8/50mm,1.8/80mm,Tessar 2.8/50mm,Biotar 2/58mm,1.5/75mm,1.5/7,5cm
Carl Zeiss: Sonnar 2.8/135,2.8/180mm,Tessar 4/135mm
Nikon: 3.5/20mm,2.8/28mm,1.4/35mm,1.4/50mm,1.2/50mm,2/50mm,1.8/105mm,2.5/105mm,4/200mm macro,4.5/300mm
Pentax: Pentax 1.2/50mm,1.8/85mm,4/200mm
Helios: Helios-40 1.5/8,5cm,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm
Olympus OM: 3.5/18mm,3.5/21mm,1.4/50mm,3.5/55mm macro,2.8/135mm,2/90mm macro,35-70mm,60-250mm
Meyer: 4.5/35mm Primagon,Primoplan 1.9/58mm,1.9/75mm,2.8/100mm,Orestegor 2.8/135mm,4.5/40 Helioplan
Leica: 4/100 Macro Elmar,2.8/90 Elmarit last version
Please visit my Ebay shop to support my reviews !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
patrickh



Level 4

Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 3576
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio
Herbert von Karajan recovered his career by recanting - although I for one remain unconvinced about his conducting/interpretative skills. As far as I am aware Leni Riefenstahl did not feel she had any apologies to make. Politics will always outrank art - as indeed "Excretum tauri vincit cerebellum". Let us appreciate what she left, learn from it and her mistakes and move on. Cruel but sane.


patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D70 Nikon D200 Canon 40D
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, Nikkor 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 3004.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Kiron 28/2 Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Flektogon 35/2.4, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Arsat 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro,Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Jupiter 135/4, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8, 35/2.8
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Orio




Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 12541
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I still am unable to understand why it seems so difficult to judge a photographer from his/her photographs only.

I keep wondering what would happen if, for instance, tomorrow newspapers reported evidences that Pablo Picasso was a child abuser.
Would his artworks be forbidden? Would the books of history of art be rewritten because of that? Would all the following painters that he influenced, be not described as influenced by him, because it would be shameful?

I can not help feeling that this mentality is an aberration.

But I also feel like we will never agree on this point, so I agree it's time to leave this topic and move on.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

Read list of equipment HERE

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
F16SUNSHINE



Level 4

Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 2671
Location: Anacortes Washington

PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What will we be saying about the American Conservative media in 10,15, 30 years or more. The way that this war is so blindly covered in the US is blatant and very uncomfortable. The fact that people take sides during time of war and conflict is admissible. To knowingly support an oppressive regime and it's manifesto is another story. It is a real conflict for those who appreciate artistic vision (fox news and the like is not art in any form). What motivates an artist and the mechanism to support there work is often in conflict. We can not always know why people make there choices. But to not appreciate the artistic vision that someone has is unrealistic. We are all human. That means we are all capable of very brilliant and very despicable decisions in our lives. Sometimes it is important to appreciate the good things that come from those who also make very bad decisions. It is a reminder to have compassion and I think a very healthy exercise. Everyone in there life will have to make a choice that is difficult to live with. For some it is an easy burden, others the thing that becomes their undoing. Still I believe it is best in life to look for the good in people. Even those who have chosen wrongly in there lives. This artist had something to offer us all. To not see that positive is a waste. It is obvious her work came from a place of beauty not hate. So WE should enjoy her vision and learn to avoid the mistakes that where made. Those who simply profit from conflict and oppressive thinking do not deserve this kind of understanding. They are the only ones who deserve harsh judgement.

Andy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BobDodds



Level 1

Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 77

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

R-Biotar, roentgen biotar, what did Leni use to bend the bottom line spectral response of film? Foveon is weird, too. Foveon and R-Biotar is nice weird.

"She kept ill-advised company". So did Jesus.

Charlie Chaplin made a great antiwar movie, but profitable tomb whitewashers flooded the Ruhr mines and cultivated Hitler from the 1920's(Sam and Prescott Bush) and prevented Konrad Adenhauer from blocking their patsy for war profits.

I watched LR's olympics movie, and a documentary showing her in Kenya after the war. She might have been exiled from working in film. She made film and still photos. More Jesse Owen, she gave fair play to a non-aryan folk culture.

Paavo Nurmi took steroids.

My grandmother's father got his MD at Leipzig. Then his son went to fight his father's friends' sons in WWI. He said in a letter to his dad that the soldiers on both sides were the same, and he drew pictures of them. One was black, one wore a turban, one had a muslim crescent insignia. The problem is that the war profiteers are the same on both sides, too. al-CIA-duh is terrorbombing north Iran and the Indian embassy in Afghanistan, so if Obama invades Pakistan, al-CIA-duh will be fighting US while fighting Iran for the US while the US bombs Iran, or Palin dreams of Israel bombing Iran(she said as much quite literally).

The reason I read this thread is that apparently I have the only internet-documented R-Biotar made to mount on still cam, and I wondered what Riefenstahl used for bending the light spectrum by using a bent filter. X-ray lens, "Roentgen" biotar, would that help? I noticed that Sigma SD14 Foveon sensor, combined with imperfect ir filter, is picking up on colors not visible to human eye. I photographed a gray wasp nest, and a rainbow of colors marking internal tunnels came through.

Before Jesus had a name with the war memorial whitewashers, he knew how to light his name up through their spy eyes. "Tell your masters that the good news is preached to the poor". In the history of economics, that is called,"unregulated sympathy", "race treason", "sin against Darwin", don't feed the Irish or give him a job...unless you want to light your name up real quick through the low-f echelon all the way to the bright whitewashers of tax-free sweat-shopping.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lulalake



Level 3

Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 533
Location: Near Austin Texas

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BobDodds wrote:
R-Biotar, roentgen biotar, what did Leni use to bend the bottom line spectral response of film? Foveon is weird, too. Foveon and R-Biotar is nice weird.

"She kept ill-advised company". So did Jesus.

Charlie Chaplin made a great antiwar movie, but profitable tomb whitewashers flooded the Ruhr mines and cultivated Hitler from the 1920's(Sam and Prescott Bush) and prevented Konrad Adenhauer from blocking their patsy for war profits.

I watched LR's olympics movie, and a documentary showing her in Kenya after the war. She might have been exiled from working in film. She made film and still photos. More Jesse Owen, she gave fair play to a non-aryan folk culture.

Paavo Nurmi took steroids.

My grandmother's father got his MD at Leipzig. Then his son went to fight his father's friends' sons in WWI. He said in a letter to his dad that the soldiers on both sides were the same, and he drew pictures of them. One was black, one wore a turban, one had a muslim crescent insignia. The problem is that the war profiteers are the same on both sides, too. al-CIA-duh is terrorbombing north Iran and the Indian embassy in Afghanistan, so if Obama invades Pakistan, al-CIA-duh will be fighting US while fighting Iran for the US while the US bombs Iran, or Palin dreams of Israel bombing Iran(she said as much quite literally).

The reason I read this thread is that apparently I have the only internet-documented R-Biotar made to mount on still cam, and I wondered what Riefenstahl used for bending the light spectrum by using a bent filter. X-ray lens, "Roentgen" biotar, would that help? I noticed that Sigma SD14 Foveon sensor, combined with imperfect ir filter, is picking up on colors not visible to human eye. I photographed a gray wasp nest, and a rainbow of colors marking internal tunnels came through.

Before Jesus had a name with the war memorial whitewashers, he knew how to light his name up through their spy eyes. "Tell your masters that the good news is preached to the poor". In the history of economics, that is called,"unregulated sympathy", "race treason", "sin against Darwin", don't feed the Irish or give him a job...unless you want to light your name up real quick through the low-f echelon all the way to the bright whitewashers of tax-free sweat-shopping.


Bob,

Great post. My favorite line is this

""She kept ill-advised company". So did Jesus."

HA HA HA.

Cheers

Jules
_________________
Heisenberg may have slept here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Art Talk All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group