Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups  Rss feed   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Adobe RGB or SRGB for Laboratories?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Techniques
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11652
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:07 pm    Post subject: Adobe RGB or SRGB for Laboratories? Reply with quote

Do you print your digital photos at home, or do you use the services of Photo Printing Labs?

I recently had some prints done by a Lab from my digital photos. I gave them a DVD of my photos, converted to TIF and in Adobe RGB colorspace.
Well, the prints turned out much desaturated. Just like when you convert to JPGs for web and forget to convert colorspace from Adobe RGB to SRGB.

So I am wondering, perhaps the photo labs use SRGB as standard color space?
(Maybe they do that because they think that most people will have SRGB turned on by default and not even know about colorspace?)

What are your experiences on the subject?
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7105
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as I know, it is better to hand in the photos in sRGB.
Two reasons:

1) You have a better control what the photos look like afterwards. Our screens cannot show AdobeRGB.

2) In AdobeRGB are "more" colours. But those cannot be reproduced by mini-labs. Thus they need to re-calculate the colour-workspace which, if not exactly done, results in rather flat colours.

I shoot in AdobeRGB, to have some kind of reserve, but then convert during post production into sRGB. It is, however, a good idea to store in AdobeRGB, since if you need to provide photos for magazine printing there will be better results for the convertion into CMYK.

Carsten
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS500, Spotmatic SPII, Yashica-24, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Kiron: 2/28;70-210 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;2.8/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 1.7/50;2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Petri2.8/28; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; 2.8/135; Weltblick3.5/135; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11652
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
As far as I know, it is better to hand in the photos in sRGB.
Two reasons:

1) You have a better control what the photos look like afterwards. Our screens cannot show AdobeRGB.

2) In AdobeRGB are "more" colours. But those cannot be reproduced by mini-labs. Thus they need to re-calculate the colour-workspace which, if not exactly done, results in rather flat colours.

I shoot in AdobeRGB, to have some kind of reserve, but then convert during post production into sRGB. It is, however, a good idea to store in AdobeRGB, since if you need to provide photos for magazine printing there will be better results for the convertion into CMYK.

Carsten


This sounds like a very wise advice, Carsten!
One that I will follow.

My next print batch for laboratories will be in SRGB. I will report about the results.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
zipp




Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 36
Location: Montreal QC, Canada

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow! This thread is the answer to my prayers!

Untill now, I've tried to use my printer, home... I did use the labs... but the result was I lost a good piece of quality on transfering the image on paper. Sad (I did use just Adobe RGB savings)

Thanks a lot for advice.
_________________
Angel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LucisPictor



Level 4

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 7105
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're welcome.

But please don't be too disappointed if you do not get the results you want immediately.

If you print yourself, you need to do some colour adjusting (of display and printer).

In a mini-lab I always ask them not to "work" at the photos but to leave them the way they are. Mostly they will deteriorate their quality if they try to improve them.

Their regular post production is good for the common snapshot, but not for crazy guys like us who optimise their digital images at home.

Fortunately, after a while I have found a rather good mini-lab. The guys there are quite flexible.

Carsten
_________________
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who divide the world into two kinds of people, and those who don’t.
"Schnäppchenjäger" | "KAPCTEH" | "Karusutenu" | "Carsten" | T-shirt?
Cams in use: EOS 40D, EOS 350D, EOS500, Spotmatic SPII, Yashica-24, EXA I & 1c, Zenit EM; Oly 35RC,Minolta Hi-Matic E & F, Ricoh 500RF, Yashica Electro 35 GS, FED-3b and some others...
Lenses in use: Asahi Pentax: 2.8/28;3.5/35;1.4/50;1.7/50;2.8/105;28-80 | Canon (AF):1.8/50;17-85;75-300 | Former GDR: Pentacon 3.5/30; Pentaflex 1.8/50; CZJ 2.8/50; CZJ 4/135; Pentacon 4/200 | Fujinon: 43-75 | Hanimex: 3.5/23; 4/100;80-200 | Hoya: 25-42;80-205 | Kiron: 2/28;70-210 | Leica: Elmarit-R 2.8/35 | Mamiya: 1.8/55 | Minolta: 1.7/50 | Nikkor: 2.8/24;2/35;2/50;1.2/55;1.8/85;3.5/135 | West German: Ludwig 2.9/50; Meyer 2.8/100; Will 4.5/105; Schneider 3.5/135;Enna 3.5/135; Zeiss 4/135;Isco 4/135; Enna 4.5/240 | Olympus: 3.5/28;1.4/50;3.5/135 | Rikenon: 1.7/50;35-70 | Rollei/Voigtländer: 1.4/55;1.8/50 | Russian: Peleng3.5/8; Zenitar2.8/16; MIR2.8/37; Volna2.8/50; Industar3.5/50; Industar3.5/5cm; Helios2/50; Helios2/58; Volna2.8/80; Jupiter2/85; Kaleinar2.8/100;Tair2.8/135; Jupiter3.5/135; Jupiter4/135; Telear3.5/200; Jupiter4/200; Tair4.5/300;RF: Jupiter2.8/35;Industar2.8/53 | Sigma: 28-85;28-105(AF);17-70(AF) | Soligor: 28-105;35-200;70-220 | Tamron: 2.5/24;2.5/135;2.8/135;60-300;70-210 | Tokina: 28-105;80-200;12-24(AF);70-210(AF) | Vivitar: 3.5/17;2/24;2/28;2.5/28;2.8/28 | Yashica: 1.7/50;2/5cm | Other Japanese: Cosina3.8/20; Petri2.8/28; Albinar2.8/28; Porst1.8/35; 2.8/135; Weltblick3.5/135; Beroflex 8/500; Spiratone28-200; Maginon70-210
Green are the lenses I shoot the most.
More? http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rob Leslie



Level 3

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 661
Location: UK Swindon

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

First and foremost. ALL good labs will make it clear what colour space they use. If they don't I would think twice about using them. For the chepo prints plain old sRGB is best, but there is a Fuji profile. FF frontier Print PD but it is doubtfull the machines at Tesco/Asda will be set up anyway
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11652
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob Leslie wrote:
First and foremost. ALL good labs will make it clear what colour space they use.


I am not in direct contact with the labs, I live in a small town and have to deliver the originals to a photo shop - they in turn deliver to the photo lab courier. But I will ask the photo shop to get the information - thanks for the good suggestion.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rob Leslie



Level 3

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 661
Location: UK Swindon

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
Rob Leslie wrote:
First and foremost. ALL good labs will make it clear what colour space they use.


I am not in direct contact with the labs, I live in a small town and have to deliver the originals to a photo shop - they in turn deliver to the photo lab courier. But I will ask the photo shop to get the information - thanks for the good suggestion.


First I would recommend you buy a good photo printer but I feel sure you already have one. So why would you be using what sounds like a pretty ordinary print service? I use an Asda (Walmart) one for quantities of 7x5 prints for sale 100 at a time, (Very cheap) but I know the staff well and they always reprint anything (NC) I am not 100% happy with. I sometimes think they use me to find out when to call the engineer in to recalibrate! Their prints can be good and are best for selling to the public but they are not a patch on those from the Epson on good paper (MX2 pro)
I also have up to 20 x 16 and 4 at time 10 x 8 prints or 2 11 x 16 done by a pro printer in my town he has the latest Epson machine (Huge) and really knows his stuff. He always sets the print up with me in PS on his computer before he saves to print. He also only charges ?7 for 16 inch from his 60cm wide paper. Before I found my local guy I used http://www.colormailer.com for large prints. Their enlargements/posters are done in Belgium and are pretty good quality at a reasonable price. They will also print Adobe RGB.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Orio



Level 4

Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 11652
Location: West Emilia

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob Leslie wrote:

First I would recommend you buy a good photo printer but I feel sure you already have one. So why would you be using what sounds like a pretty ordinary print service?


Because my home made prints look horrible. I have given up the hope to make my Epson Photo printers work correctly. They always add reddish cast to my prints. Yes I have calibrated the monitors correctly. So I maybe will make a last tentative by buying a Canon printer. Should it fail too, I will abandon home printing forever.
_________________
_
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano

Main Tools:
LENSES: Carl Zeiss, Leitz, Soviet, old Nikkors, others.
DSLR: Canon EOS 5D, 50D. SLR: Contax AX, RX, 167MT; Voigtländer Bessaflex TM; Praktica FX2; Nikon FM2, F70.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Kiev-4, Voigtlaender Bessa-T, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta, Agfa Record II.

Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net

"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rob Leslie



Level 3

Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 661
Location: UK Swindon

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The usual problem with poor prints is a mismatch of colour profiles. First check your profile in Photoshop – Edit – Colour settings set the box ‘working spaces’ RGB to your colour space sRGB or Adobe RGB. Then check your image – Image – Mode – assign or Convert to profile. Now when you print always use Print with preview. A box opens and you set Colour Management and then below Print space profile and pick your profile whatever you set PS at. Then Print and go as normal picking your paper and size but go Custom Advanced ICM. The printer then takes the colour instruction from PS. Assuming all is right with your printer no blocked heads, paper type and the monitor is right it should match. No good getting a Canon printer (Nothing wrong with them) but Epson have always been the best. I run mine on cheap ink and have for years (The Photo Ex for 8 years) it even prints a BW with no colour cast. I wouldn’t go for any other printer because of the cost of ink. If I pay that much for ink I might as well have the pro do it for me.

Edit Out of interest I just checked the colour profiles in Adobe RGB and sRGB in PS. Adobe is redder. if you do nothing and you are shooting Adobe RGB your printer will print its default version of RGB so that is why your prints look red.
_________________
Pentax K10D & K100D. Many Tamron Adaptall SP lenses, Fujinon f4.5 400mm. A loved Lens Baby 2, Lubitel triplet +++ and many many film cameras. Mainly a Digital user.
http://roblesliephotography.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ChrisLilley



Level 3

Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 940
Location: Nice, France

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
As far as I know, it is better to hand in the photos in sRGB.
Two reasons:

1) You have a better control what the photos look like afterwards. Our screens cannot show AdobeRGB.

Some screens can, but they are rather expensive and not in common use. But yes, for handing images to a printer who is probably not using color management of any sort, give them sRGB.

Also, when doing the conversion from AdobeRGB to sRGB, select 'relative colorimetric' method, not 'perceptual'; and ensure that black point compensation is on.

LucisPictor wrote:
2) In AdobeRGB are "more" colours. But those cannot be reproduced by mini-labs. Thus they need to re-calculate the colour-workspace which, if not exactly done, results in rather flat colours.

The flat colours do not arise from recalculation. They come from a lack of recalculation ... the numbers in AdobeRGB are treated as if they are sRGB, without any recalculation. As you say, the gamut (range of colors) in AdobeRGB is wider. So all the colours get compressed down towards the grey axis.

LucisPictor wrote:
I shoot in AdobeRGB, to have some kind of reserve, but then convert during post production into sRGB. It is, however, a good idea to store in AdobeRGB, since if you need to provide photos for magazine printing there will be better results for the convertion into CMYK.

This is good advice. IF you shoot RAW and thus, have 16-bit originals. If you shoot JPEG only, then because JPEG is only 8 bit, you may get more banding if usinga wider gamut. In that case its better to have your JPEGs shot in sRGB. But then, if the magazine asks for an uncompressed TIFF you have nothing to give them anyway.

(well ok in theory JPEG can be 12 bit. But its done in such a stupid way that no-one can use it - the relevant library can be compiled to handle either 8 but JPEGs or 12 bit JPEGs but not both at the same time. D'oh!)
_________________
Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ais, Ai'ed, pre-Ai
Camera: Nikon D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 non-AI | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Nikkor-S.C 50mm f/1.4 non-AI | Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Vivitar Series 1 (Kiron) 70-210 f/3.5 | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
poilu



Level 4

Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 2927
Location: Greece

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am very happy with my R265 epson printer.
In PC
- AdobeRGB
- Printer Manages Color
- Relative Colorimetric
In Epson
- Color Controls
- Gamma 2.2
- Color Mode : Adobe RGB

I have a lot of A3 print in my kitchen and as my printer is only A4 I glue 2 pages.
Lot of people see my print and nobody never ask me why they are cut
I also print posters 3x3 A4 but it's tricky to cut & glue them
Service like colormailer ask 20 euros for a 60x90 and print on pigment inkjet
I should give a try but I don't wait better result
_________________
Have a nice day
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Juanma



Level 2

Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 259
Location: Cambrils, Spain

PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In general, use sRGB unless:

- You print yourself your photos, as Poilu
- You know your lab very well, and they use AdobeRGB (most of them don't)

If you shoot RAW, the choose between AbobeRGB/sRGB is done in the computer, not in the camera. RAW is always the best idea.

In my opinion, for usual shots (not very big printed and not heavy processed), AdobeRGB is only a burden.
_________________
Juanma

Canon EOS 600 | Praktica MTL5B | Zorki 4K | Jupiter 8 | Flektogon 4/20 | Pentacon 2,8/29 | Flektogon 2,4/35 | Tessar 2,8/50 | Industar 50-2 | Jupiter 9 | Sonnar 3,5/135 | Some AF stuff | A couple of MF lenses coming...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Manual Focus Lenses Forum Index -> Techniques All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group