View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2201 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:04 pm Post subject: About to process my first b/w roll at home, tips? |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
I started shooting b/w film again after a long time of digital-only shooting.
The last develop/scans from the only local shop that does it did not really satisfy me, both for so-so quality and high prices, so I think I will try and develop/scan negatives at home.
I read a lot about the process, and I should have everything I need (tank/spirals, film retrievers, measuring cylinders, plastic bottles, thermometers etc.) except for chemicals.
I need advices both on the overall process (as it seem clear enough to me on paper but it will be a first time, so anything could basically go wrong) and especially on what developer-stopper-fixer to buy. For now I have a bunch of Ilford HP5 plus 400 film rolls and some ilford 3200 iso that will be kindly donated by a friend, but I plan to get some different film later on, if the trial gives some encouraging results.
Any kind of advice on any aspect of the process will be much appreciated. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Good luck developing your films, you will get a difference of opinion regarding which developer to use but any film dev will do it. Old film may be better exposed a stop under - ie HP5 may be better rated at 200 rather than 400.
The important things to remember:
Keep your fingers off the emulsion when loading the tank.
It MUST be absolute dark - a little glimmer of light may fog the film.
Get the developer to the right temperature by putting the container in warm water.
Develop it for the time specified in the leaflet that came with it.
Agitate as per the instructions. Agitate = turn the tank over a couple of times every so often
Make sure all the developer is drained out before putting in stop bath. You can reuse the developer - add about 10% extra time.
Stop bath isn't absolutely necessary, a little white vinegar added to fresh water is fine.
Rinse the film a couple of times before adding the fixer.
Fix for at least 5 minutes before taking off the tank lid. - don't over do it though.
Wash while the film is still on the spiral, run water into the tank down the middle of the spiral for about 10 minutes - COLD water.
Hang the film to dry. I use a clothes peg to hang it up and one at the bottom to hold the film down.
Do not 'squeegee' the film or wipe any drops of water off this may scratch the emulsion.
Avoid the temptation to handle the film when it appears dry. The emulsion can be soft and easily damaged or pick up dirt. Let it dry overnight
The film will curl across its width, the curl will drop out after a few days. The curl makes it difficult to scan properly.
good luck and let us know how you get on - good or bad _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2201 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
Thanks Phil, much appreciated.
The film I was given, the HP5 at least, I still have to check for the 3200 iso, is not old: it will expire in 2017 and I'm pretty sure my friend stored it perfectly, so it probably won't need to be rated at 200 or so. If nobody gives me a reason to do differently, I will buy a developer from Ilford (maybe LC29) just to reduce the variables to a minimum and make spotting errors easier.
Obviously I will share results here, and ask for more advices. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
LC29 is cheap but as its Ilford it will be good. ID11 would be my choice. But for a first attempt, you just want something to do the job. Caffenol is good. Look for recipes - you make it yourself. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
ID 11 is excellent hint. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
I've been using Ilfosol 3 lately with stunning results, too.
I'll second everything Phil says. If you have hard water then you'll need to squeegee the film after the rinse to avoid mineral circles. (You may need to even if you have soft water.) _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2201 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
David wrote: |
I've been using Ilfosol 3 lately with stunning results, too.
I'll second everything Phil says. If you have hard water then you'll need to squeegee the film after the rinse to avoid mineral circles. (You may need to even if you have soft water.) |
Thanks: I will surely do that as our well water is indeed very hard.
As for developers I just found ID 11 available at a local reseller, so I'll go for that. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Aanything wrote: |
David wrote: |
I've been using Ilfosol 3 lately with stunning results, too.
I'll second everything Phil says. If you have hard water then you'll need to squeegee the film after the rinse to avoid mineral circles. (You may need to even if you have soft water.) |
Thanks: I will surely do that as our well water is indeed very hard.
As for developers I just found ID 11 available at a local reseller, so I'll go for that. |
if the water is hard, as it is here in cheshire, a little 'wetting agent' will do the trick. I dip the tip of my finger into a little washing up liquid and mix it in the final rinse water. Agitate to mix it up. It removes the surface tension and will allow the film to dry leaving little or no drying marks. too much will cause foam.
If you must squeegee, use your fingers rather than the rubber devices designed for the job. They can catch dirt or be held too tight and can cause nice tramlines down your film. I use my forefinger and middle finger and pull the film strip through them. Wash your hands first and rub them together so your fingers are not completely dry - no loose water.
Drying spots are usually no problem as most cannot be seen anyway when scanned. Spots on the base side can be romoved with a microfibre lens cloth when the film is dry.
here is a photo with drying marks on the neg.
devved in foma something
its a washing machine _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014 Posts: 724
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
Hi
I am also thinking on how to start developing my black and white films.. I am a bit scared though and the process looks very hard... I have two very dark rooms at house but I am not sure what else is needed. Still one think is not clear one you develop the negatives what you do afterwards if you do not have a film scanner?
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4748 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
You dont need an actual dark room. I was loading my tank under a coat (with my arms through the sleeves) in the darkened bedroom until I acquired a changing bag in a box of camera stuff. this was fine. Practice with a spare film. Once the film is in the tank and the seal and top half is on you can do the rest in daylight. The little flexible cap is just to stop the developer spilling out when you agitate.
I use a camera to 'scan' b&w negs as its easy to invert them in photoshop. I use a bellows and enlarging lens to copy the film - a reversed lens will also do the job as of course will a macro. I have an old flatbed scanner (Epson 3490) which does the trick with colour negs. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014 Posts: 724
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
I do not think my printer supports negative scanning..
https://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/product?cc=us&lc=en&dlc=en&product=3793676
If I understand it right being able to develop my black and white film would allow me to tweak contrast e.t.c which I am pretty much interested in learning to doing
A. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2014 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
Alaois, developing film at home gives you MANY more creative options than just contrast tweaking. Here's a short list:
-pushing film
-pulling film
-different developers (D-76, Ilfosol, Rodinal, Microdol-X, and many hundreds more)
-alternative processes, like Caffenol or Wineol
-experimental films like expired stock
-experimental films like motion picture stock (which can have simply incredible results, BTW)
-water bath treatment for contrast reduction
And of course it's a LOT cheaper to develop at home. The local lab is now charging $11 to develop (and NOTHING ELSE) a roll of film. For $11, I can buy a gallon of developer and a gallon of fix and develop about 40 rolls of film myself.
And most of all, seeing a well developed negative hanging up to dry in your bathtub is the kind of rewarding feeling that makes you sleep better at night.
I also do not have a real darkroom -- a film bag (and tent for 4X5), nine tanks (I stockpile my film until I have 20 rolls to develop, because I'm lazy), and a bunch of clotheslines nailed to the walls above my tub for hanging film to dry. I also keep my bulk film in the fridge and have some bulk loaders to use for restocking film.
Bulk film + home developing chemicals = about 1,000 feet of film for the cost of a high-end prosumer DSLR (e.g., Nikon 610). And that's assuming that you buy TMax at $70 per 100 feet instead of Foma at $30 per 100 feet or Kodak motion picture stock at $15 per 100 feet. 1,000 feet of film = 7,500 frames. That's a per-frame price of about 13 cents if you go with the most expensive film you can find. If you go with Foma at $30 per 100 feet, then you're looking at more like 2,000 feet of film or 15,000 frames -- six cents per exposure. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|