 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 419 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:54 am Post subject: About Noise, Grain and Scanning |
|
|
This is what I do.
About the picture: It’s a long and kind of funny story, too long for this post so I’ll get to that in a different post.
Here’s the shot: It’s taken on a bright morning with Portra 800 ASA film, Jupiter-9 lens, I chose this speed film so I could get very fast exposures, They were shot from 1/350th to 1/1000th sec at F11- F22 depending on the lens. I used a Canon AL-1 QF with a M42 adapter. So I’m using a low contrast film, low contrast lens (with a yellowish color cast).
It was scanned on a Nikon Coolscan V ED at 4000 DPI. The original scan was “flat” with no tweaking other that manual focusing on the hair dryer in the fellow’s hand and resizing.
The Scanner comes with two pieces of software bundled in the Nikonscan software, Kodak ROC (restore original color)and GEM (Grain-Noise reduction software). These are my favorite grain noise reduction softwares.
Here’s a 100% blowup of the original shot, no tweaking
Next I show a scan with the color adjusted using ROC.
Then I show a scan with the color adjusted and the grain reduction software added.
Almost done:
I ALWAYS sharpen scans, “raw” scans are always a bit unsharp. I use The Light’s Right Studios sharpening scripts (not the actions). They are very useful and very subtle, one or two pixels wide sharpening and here is the result.
Here is the end result: (also spotted to remove processing dirt and dust)
The result is pretty subtle except for the color but the small enhancements work for me.
Cheers
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Orio


Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 10764 Location: West Emilia
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very good noise reduction, indeed. _________________ _
ХОРИОС-61 ( ώρεος ) : Lens sana in corpore sano
Main Tools:
LENSES: Russian, Zeiss, Leitz, old Nikkors.
DSLR: Canon 5D, 400D. SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM, Nikon FM2, Canon 50E, Contax 167MT.
RANGEFINDERS: Contax G2, Canonette QL17. MEDIUM FORMAT: Pentacon 6, Zeiss Super Ikonta.
Read Full List HERE
www.timelessphotography.eu
www.oriofoto.net
"Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. " (George Orwell)
_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 419 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Orio,
You can google KODAK GEM (The noise grain reducer). There's a free trial download for the plug-in.
It seems Kodak was really going after film grain as it works very well on scanned images.
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
F16SUNSHINE


Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 1474 Location: Anacortes Washington
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice post Jules. I will try your process as it looks quite effective. Maybe your friend should research a commercial sandblaster. Certainly it would be easier on the wifeys hairdryer  _________________ Canon: 5D,40D Contax: Aria,RTS,RTS II, RX Leica: CL Voigtlander: Bessa L
Pentax: Spotmatic,SpotmaticF,MX,6x7
Yashica FR, FX3, 124G
Asahi:SuperTak4/17,1.4/50,SMC1.4/50 1.8/55,3.5/55(67), 2.5/105(67)
Contax: 4/18 2.8/28 2.8/35 1.4/50 2.8/60 1.4/85 2.8/85 2/100 3.5/100 2.8/180
Rollie SL CZ 1.4/85
Leica 2/90
Nikkor 1.2/55
Vivitar S1 2.8/105macro 28-90
Voigtlander 4.5/15 4/25 1.4/40
Yashica ML 3.5/21 2.8/24 2.8/28 2/50 1.7/50 1.4/50 4/55macro 2.8/135 70-210
Zuiko 2/21 3.5/21 2/24 3.5/24shift 2/28 2/35 1.8/50 2.8/100
Russian/DDR/German: CZ 4.5/40 CZ 2.8/50 Trioplan 2.8/100 Primoplan 1.9/58 Mir 1 helios 44-2 industar 3.5/50
Rangefinders Yashica: YE w 2.8/5cm, 35, Lynx 1000, 5000, 14E IC, MinisterIII, Electro 35G, GS, GT, GSN, GTN, GL, GX, CC Canon QL17III, Konica S2, S1.6 Plaubel Makina II |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 419 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| F16SUNSHINE wrote: | Nice post Jules. I will try your process as it looks quite effective. Maybe your friend should research a commercial sandblaster. Certainly it would be easier on the wifeys hairdryer  |
LOL!, I'll post about what he's actually doing later.
Cheers
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maddog10


Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 736 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to see the full size, color corrected shot (before noise reduction). I am always afraid to do too much noise reduction, afraid I might reduce more than just noise.
Looks like an excellent result! _________________ Michael Hill
DSLR: Nikon - D3, D80, D40 Canon- 5D
Film: Nikon - F5, F2, F, EM, FG, FE, Nikkorex Contax - G2 Mamiya - M645 Olympus - OM1 Praktika - LTL PLC3 Pentax - Spotmatic SP Yashica Electro 35 GSN Zenit - B
Nikon Mount Lens: Nikkor - 2.8/20 2.8/24 2/28 2.8/28 3.5/28 2/35 2.8/35 1.4/50 1.8/50 2/50 1.8/85 2/85 2.5/105 2.8/135 3.5/135 2.8/180 4/200 4.5/300 Micro 2.8/55 Micro 4/200 Zoom 3.5/36-72 3.5/43-86 4/70-210 Sigma - Zoom 2.8-4/35-70 Soligor - 3.5-4.5/28-80 4.5/80-200 5.6/95-310 Tamron - SP 2.8-3.8/35-80 SP 3.5/70-210 3.8-4/80-210 Vivitar - 3.8/19 2.8/28 (Series 1) 3.5-4.5/19-35 (Kiron) 3.5/70-210 Zenitar - 2.8/16
Contax Mount Lens: Carl Zeiss - Biogon 2.8/21 Biogon 2.8/28 Planar 2/45 Sonnar 2.8/90 Yashica - 4.5/70-210
M42 Screw Mount Lens: CZJ - Flek 2.8/20 Flek 2.4/35 Tessar 2.8/50 3.5/135 Focal - 2.8/28 Helios - 44-2 2/58 44M 2/58 44M-4 2/58 40 1.5/85 Industar - 50-2 3.5/50 Jupiter - 37A 3.5/135 Meyer Optik Gorlitz - Domiplan 2.8/50 MIR - 24M 2/35 1B 2.8/37 Pentacon - 2.8/29 1.8/50 2.8/135 Pentax - SMC 3.5/135 SMC 4/200 SMC 5.6/400 Rexatar - 6.3/400 Rokinon - 3.5-4.5/35-135 Sears - 2.8/28 2.8/135 4.5/90-230 Soligor - 2.8/105 3.5-4.5/28-80 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 419 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Michael,
Sure. Here it is color corrected full size no noise reduction. (Converted to .jpg from .tif)
http://tinyurl.com/4nqkjg
I'll leave it up for a while. It's biiiig 4.5 megs
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
maddog10


Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 736 Location: Maryland, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Jules.
I just wanted to see if noise reduction would even be needed. The color correction is the main thing that was need for the photo. I like the version without the noise reduction, but I can see where a slight reduction can make an improvement. Thanks for posting this series. _________________ Michael Hill
DSLR: Nikon - D3, D80, D40 Canon- 5D
Film: Nikon - F5, F2, F, EM, FG, FE, Nikkorex Contax - G2 Mamiya - M645 Olympus - OM1 Praktika - LTL PLC3 Pentax - Spotmatic SP Yashica Electro 35 GSN Zenit - B
Nikon Mount Lens: Nikkor - 2.8/20 2.8/24 2/28 2.8/28 3.5/28 2/35 2.8/35 1.4/50 1.8/50 2/50 1.8/85 2/85 2.5/105 2.8/135 3.5/135 2.8/180 4/200 4.5/300 Micro 2.8/55 Micro 4/200 Zoom 3.5/36-72 3.5/43-86 4/70-210 Sigma - Zoom 2.8-4/35-70 Soligor - 3.5-4.5/28-80 4.5/80-200 5.6/95-310 Tamron - SP 2.8-3.8/35-80 SP 3.5/70-210 3.8-4/80-210 Vivitar - 3.8/19 2.8/28 (Series 1) 3.5-4.5/19-35 (Kiron) 3.5/70-210 Zenitar - 2.8/16
Contax Mount Lens: Carl Zeiss - Biogon 2.8/21 Biogon 2.8/28 Planar 2/45 Sonnar 2.8/90 Yashica - 4.5/70-210
M42 Screw Mount Lens: CZJ - Flek 2.8/20 Flek 2.4/35 Tessar 2.8/50 3.5/135 Focal - 2.8/28 Helios - 44-2 2/58 44M 2/58 44M-4 2/58 40 1.5/85 Industar - 50-2 3.5/50 Jupiter - 37A 3.5/135 Meyer Optik Gorlitz - Domiplan 2.8/50 MIR - 24M 2/35 1B 2.8/37 Pentacon - 2.8/29 1.8/50 2.8/135 Pentax - SMC 3.5/135 SMC 4/200 SMC 5.6/400 Rexatar - 6.3/400 Rokinon - 3.5-4.5/35-135 Sears - 2.8/28 2.8/135 4.5/90-230 Soligor - 2.8/105 3.5-4.5/28-80 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lulalake


Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 419 Location: Near Austin Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| maddog10 wrote: | Thanks Jules.
I just wanted to see if noise reduction would even be needed. The color correction is the main thing that was need for the photo. I like the version without the noise reduction, but I can see where a slight reduction can make an improvement. Thanks for posting this series. |
Thanks Michael,
In the Nikonscan software the GEM noise reduction is a cut-down version of the actual Kodak GEM plug in. There is only an "amount" (0 to 4 option).
I noise reduced it at "4", the most possible in order to show the max that one can get.
Another technique I use is to make a copy of the "raw" file, apply the noise reduction, copy the noise reduced version to the original version on a layer then only paint in the sections that I feel need noise reduction.
Noise/Grain tends to give apparent detail and some places need that detail where others don't like skies etc.
I didn't do that to the "final" version that I posted but when I do the actual final copy, I will. (I agree there are areas that need more "detail" in the final version.)
Cheers
Jules _________________ Heisenberg may have slept here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|