Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

A walk through a park with MIR-1B and Tamron SP 70-210...
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:25 pm    Post subject: A walk through a park with MIR-1B and Tamron SP 70-210... Reply with quote

We have a nice park close by. And today we found some time to "promenade" a little.
Of course, I brought my cam. As my lenses for today I chose the MIR-1B and the Tamron SP 70-210 (Remember? The "broken" one?).

Here are some shots. (PP with PS CS)

(MIR)


(Tamron)










I just wanted to "test" and "play around" with the lenses a little, but I really started to like the lenses (OK, the MIR I already knew...)

Guess these photos might be a bit boring but are worth sharing.

Carsten

P.S.: The pictures with people follow. And I need to have my FED-3 film roll developed.


PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And here are two of the shots in colour:





I can't make up my mind which version I like more.

Carsten


PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like colours and I like your captures in colours much more than B&W. You have a nice park really and you made great captures.


PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really like the results.
What the conversion steps/methods you used (to monochrome)... some PS plugin... The contrast really popping out...
Great ones...


PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, very nice results. I couldn't decide if I like bw- or color-versions more. The atmosphere is totally different.

Michael


PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
I can't make up my mind which version I like more.


Nice pictures Carsten. Colour is a very subjective thing, I like the stone urn better in B&W (taken with the Mir-1B I'm guessing) but I like the house in colour, which I think I recognise is with the Tamron. I'm growing to like the way the Tamron lenses give a slightly cooler cast.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carsten, all are great shots, but I prefer the house in color, too. The
house, could you tell me what period of architecture this is from? Some
interesting detail at the tippy-top of the roof...wouldn't be a "widow's
walk" since the town you live in isn't a seaport.

Very nice series, Carsten, thanks for sharing! Smile
Bill


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ballu wrote:
What the conversion steps/methods you used (to monochrome)... some PS plugin... The contrast really popping out...
Great ones...


Thanks.
I used different ways to convert to b/w, depending on the sujet.

These are the levers I play with:

For...
...tonal range: Image - Adjustments - Levels
...contrast: Image - Adjustments - Curves
...general b/w conversions: Image - Adjustments - Channel Mixer
...toning: blending coloured layers or Duotone/Tritone and curves for each colour
...sharpening: USM or Smart Sharpen
...framing: Helicon Filters

and some alternating others.

Carsten

EDIT. correction!


Last edited by LucisPictor on Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:32 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

katastrofo wrote:
...The
house, could you tell me what period of architecture this is from? Some
interesting detail at the tippy-top of the roof...wouldn't be a "widow's
walk" since the town you live in isn't a seaport...


Hi, Bill!

Have a look here: http://www.uni-giessen.de/uni/einrichtungen/Rauischholzhausen/about.html

Here are two more shots with details of the castle building:





Carsten


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="peterqd"]
LucisPictor wrote:
... like the stone urn better in B&W (taken with the Mir-1B I'm guessing) ...


Hi, Peter!

No, I'm afraid only the first photo was taken with the MIR-1B, all the others were taken with the Tamron lens.

Carsten


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carsten,
my vote goes to the color versions. There is nothing wrong with your BW conversions, rather, it's me who often feels unhappy with the digital BW. I seldom use it, I only do when for some reason I am unhappy with the colors - never as a first choice.
Fact is, that certain "dontknowwhatness" of the film makes it for the BW for me. On digital, when I think about a possible BW from an image I often find myself wishing the image was less detailed everywhere and more organic and "whole".

EDIT to add: having that said, I would like to see the very last picture (that roof detail) in BW. I think it would be the best candidate.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, Orio!

This one is for you, my friend:


Carsten


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are the "people pics"!

I like to work with the Helion Filters (as far as I remember a Ukrainian software).

These b/w conversions are also film simulations.


(Ilford HP 5+)


(Kodak T400CN)


(Ilford Delta 100)


(Kodak Tri X400)


You lose some details and some tones but this tool simulates the characteristics of the films well.

Carsten


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carsten, is that "Helios" or "Helion" plugin? I can not find reference of either on the web.
Is it a framing plugin, or a B&W conversion plugin?


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ooops, sorry, typo!

It is called "Helicon Filter".

See here: http://www.helicon.com.ua/pages/

Originally, it's a plug-in collection (denoiser etc.), but meanwhile you can do almost a complete post production with it. Very powerful!

And the licensing is really fair, you can install it on 4 computers.

This collections was made by photographers for photographers - and this you easily realise.

Carsten


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, ok ! Of the same software house, I was aware of the other plugin, the one for macrophotography.

If you were an Asimov reader, you would have never done the typo: Helicon is the native planet of Hari Seldon (Foundation series) Wink


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
If you were an Asimov reader, you would have never done the typo: Helicon is the native planet of Hari Seldon (Foundation series) Wink


Very Happy I just read one book by him, but this was a science book not a novel. Wink

I mean, no wonder I typed "Helios" with all that enthusiasm about Russian lenses... Wink


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:

Very Happy I just read one book by him, but this was a science book not a novel. Wink


You are missing some great reading fun!
Besides, I like the BW version of the roof.
As for the Helios typo, in fact I thought about the possibility earlier Wink


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carsten,
Thanks for the roof detail pics and the link! Really like the Fed 3 pics, too,
did you do your own scanning?

Edit: so the people pics were taken with your Canon digital?

Bill


PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, sorry, Bill!

Those are not the FED-3 pics. I still need to take the film roll to the lab.

The "people shots" were also done with the Tamron and a software film simulation.

Carsten