View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1389 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
nixland wrote: |
Ahaa.. I finally found the owner of that review page |
You're welcome! It's been originally started by forum member no-X, then extended and maintained me.
nixland wrote: |
Previously I was interested in Olympus 85/2, but I read some reviews that its not very good. But you said otherwise. Could you tell it more? |
Well, I had three samples of this lens (only one left), and all are superb. Note, however, that you absolutely need an "MC" version or the later version labeled just "Zuiko" (not the older "F.Zuiko", which is not quite as sharp). The two newer versions have a floating element, meaning the distance between lens groups changes slightly when you focus closer (it's quite neat actually, I can see it in action when turning the focusing helicoid slowly). This, in turn, allows the lens to achieve excellent sharpness at all focusing distances. This was the only 85mm lens made by Olympus; they couldn't afford to have a lemon in this important focal length. Oh, and it's just as tiny as a 50/1.4 lens, and has 49mm filter threads!
PM me if you want samples (I can email them, so make sure to include your email address).
nixland wrote: |
Any significant character differences between Nikkor 85/1.4 Ais with the AF-D ? |
I haven't used the AF version of this lens. I was lucky to get a very late sample of 85/1.4 AIS with newest "SIC" coatings (distinctly different color compared to the older "NIC" coatings).
nixland wrote: |
About J-9, my black J-9 was very low contrast outdoor or when too many source light in the frame, but the older silver J-9 has very good contrast and sharper than the black one. |
What you're talking about is probably not global contrast but rather micro-contrast. Newer MC versions of J-9 have halos around bright objects that contribute to their "soft-focus" look; notably, fine detail is all there. Older black versions (e.g. early copies in SLR M39 mount) and M39 silver lenses don't have that effect. However, contrast when shooting against the light was quite poor by any standard on all of my samples (I had 3: M39 alu, M39 black, M42 MC; the black M39 one is the best of the bunch). _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
aoleg wrote: |
nixland wrote: |
Ahaa.. I finally found the owner of that review page |
You're welcome! It's been originally started by forum member no-X, then extended and maintained me.
nixland wrote: |
Previously I was interested in Olympus 85/2, but I read some reviews that its not very good. But you said otherwise. Could you tell it more? |
Well, I had three samples of this lens (only one left), and all are superb. Note, however, that you absolutely need an "MC" version or the later version labeled just "Zuiko" (not the older "F.Zuiko", which is not quite as sharp). The two newer versions have a floating element, meaning the distance between lens groups changes slightly when you focus closer (it's quite neat actually, I can see it in action when turning the focusing helicoid slowly). This, in turn, allows the lens to achieve excellent sharpness at all focusing distances. This was the only 85mm lens made by Olympus; they couldn't afford to have a lemon in this important focal length. Oh, and it's just as tiny as a 50/1.4 lens, and has 49mm filter threads!
|
That's interesting. Thanks a lot for the info. I've been misled then
By the way my silver J-9 is M42 mount. The bokeh is very smooth, while my black M42 & black MC M42 are harsher. _________________ Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1389 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
nixland wrote: |
By the way my silver J-9 is M42 mount. The bokeh is very smooth, while my black M42 & black MC M42 are harsher. |
I noticed that, too. Quite odd, isn't it? Earlier and later Jupiters look like completely different lenses. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Very unlucky me ... few days ago I've just lost bidding for Zuiko 85/2 MC on eBay ... twice!! They were finally sold around $405. By the way is that too expensive for this lens?
There is another one on eBay but the seller says it has little haze inside.
Few days ago a local seller sold Nikkor-H-C 85/1.8 and Nikkor "K" 85/1.8. I pick the K one due to the closer MFD. I read that both has the same optic design and the different is the barrel & MFD. Can you confirm that?
But if the MFD is different, isnt the design a little bit different too? _________________ Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6624 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
That seems expensive for a Zuiko 85/2. _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1631 Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
I would recommand the Sonnar 85 2.8, which have been only mentioned in the 2nd page of this thread !!!!
first the image quality, secondly the compact size, then the price. the 2.8 "small"aperture might be a problem, but it only occurs in indoors, and then again you have the high iso with th 5D2. By the way this lens is as compact as a 50mm Planar _________________ Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1389 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
nixland wrote: |
Very unlucky me ... few days ago I've just lost bidding for Zuiko 85/2 MC on eBay ... twice!! They were finally sold around $405. By the way is that too expensive for this lens?
|
That's too much IMO. I never paid more than $295 for any of my three samples. You'll just need a bit of patience, and another one will sure come along at a more reasonable price.
nixland wrote: |
There is another one on eBay but the seller says it has little haze inside.
|
Might be difficult to clean properly due to the floating element.
nixland wrote: |
Few days ago a local seller sold Nikkor-H-C 85/1.8 and Nikkor "K" 85/1.8. I pick the K one due to the closer MFD. I read that both has the same optic design and the different is the barrel & MFD. Can you confirm that?
But if the MFD is different, isnt the design a little bit different too? |
Same lens, different barrel and a slightly longer focusing helicoid to push the MFD a little closer. Optics never changed for this lens except when they started applying MC coatings (the H.C. and K versions have it, Nikkor-H does not). _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
The Samyang is a great lens for the price, but it has a flaw: a high percentage of them have sticky apertures that result in overexposures when stopped down. If you get one of these, send it back on warranty. It's well worth it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|