View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:56 pm Post subject: 85mm f/1.8 Nikkor-H Auto |
|
|
etorix wrote:
i just dont seem to be winning at getting the right 80mm
i used to have a beat-up old fluted-metal 85mm f/1.8 Nikkor-H back in the day -- i loved that lens
despite chips in the front glass, it had great sharp wide open
not really light, but maybe not too heavy neither
actually my Technica-Heliar has a step-ring araldited to its rim-thread with a HN-7 hood on it -- the correct hood for the 85mm f/1.8
i'm currently watching a couple of nice clean copies, mostly in Japan, much cleaner than the one i had
i have strong urge to get one again
8 aperture blades -- bokeh schmokeh, me i want the fast single-coat
mind you, i just spotted a scratched-front-glass 105mm 2.5 going cheap -- but thats gonna be far too weighty for m43 -- stiil -- i do
have a black Sharpie and ive never owned a copy of the 105mm 2.5 Nikkor-P ... http://i.imgur.com/ILEJS3o.jpg?2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
won auction for this
http://i.imgur.com/ToG7Tkm.jpg?1
http://i.imgur.com/dRRcnFB.jpg?1
number puts it from 1972
http://i.imgur.com/BTLIX5i.jpg?1
http://i.imgur.com/ilzjjiW.jpg?1
looks clean to me,
its actually one of my grail lenses, bin wanting one for a longtime |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
NIce lens congrats!! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
1972: NIKKOR H, so its single- as opposed to multi- coated, and in 1972 they changed to -H.C [multi-coated] .. so this is one of the last made
its a bit heavy for my declared goal of lightweight quality lenses for M43
i might have been better to buy the 85mm 2 for that, but i never fancied one
its still a lens i desired greatly, at a not bad price, i was expecting sniping but none occurred
they seem plentiful atm, tho the best ones are from Japan, this comes from the UK .. no long wait, no ransom to pay
AND i have the correct metal lenshood, had it for ages |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Had one for a while, very worthy lens and a very good value these days.
As for size/weight, 85/1.8 is going to be large no matter what. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
it went in the post already, i might get this tomorrow, cool
also i have adapters to try it immediately on my n00 G3 ...
i guess what i really want for the G3 is Nikkor P.C 8.5cm f/2 in LTM
since my adapter currently no workee on the G3
tho i'm watching a 105/2.5 which doesnt need focussing helicoid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
araucaria
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
araucaria wrote:
This lens is actually very good. I have a very beaten up copy that cost me 50€ on ebay. The front element dances and you have to pull it out to get infinite focus. But when I compare it to the nikkor afd 85 1.4 and to the bokeh champion the nikkor vr1 70-200 2.8 it holds up pretty well. On the d800 you can see it has some tiny ugly aberrations, but on the D3 the 3 lenses look almost the same (the zoom lens has no CA and the smoothest bokeh there is but it's only 2.8 ).
I think this lens is a winner if you can get it for cheap, once you get over 200€ the ai-s 85 1.4 starts to look more attractive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
well, i paid about 109 euro, and i was a bit surprised how little contention i faced later in the bidding
i thought it might go for a good bit more .. or did i miss something in the description?
i think possibly because this lens was one of the last of the metal single-coated ones made [which is actually exactly what i was after]
later in 72 they introduced the multicoated version, otherwise identical except the -H.C, but more desirable for some
i owned a tatty, very worn one, back in the day, that i really liked
btw i do actually also have a 85mm 1.4, but i'm 'resting' it
i just hope this one works close to how i'd like it to
gonna find out tomorrow, eh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
araucaria
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
araucaria wrote:
I think the mistatements on the web that non-ai lenses will kill your nikon dslr help a lot on non-ai lens prices. The worse 85 2 ai-s goes for a lot more.
The ai-s lenses don't look so primitive and that also makes the non-ai lenses less desirable.
Also the non-ai 50 1.4 is sooo bad it might turn people off from old glass, but the 85 and the 105 2.5 (sonnar and gauss) can compete even with modern glass. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
as it goes, i never owned a 105mm2.5, i really want to try one
i'm watching a 10.5cm S mount now
and possibly a little oddly, a Nikkor 105mm f2.5, non-metallic focussing-ring, from about 1977 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
littleearth
Joined: 21 Dec 2011 Posts: 77 Location: PT
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
littleearth wrote:
That's an amazing lens for B&W portraits !
Sharp wide open, with just the right amount of coma/swirly bokeh (unlike the later AI/AI-S versions).
Last edited by littleearth on Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
araucaria
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
araucaria wrote:
I think the range finder 10.5cm is the same as the silver nose nikkor-p 10.5 2.5 (sonnar) , so it will be a nice complement to the other 105 2.5 which is supposed to be sharper. (I only have the sonnar but a friend owns the newer one)
Here are some samples. All wide open except the long street shot which should be f5.6 (I don't remember).
I turned off all the sharpening and CA/lens corrections so you can evaluate the quality. The compression makes the noise look ugly. D800 focused with standart ground glass (it's doable ) I always have to laugh when people say that the 36mp need expensive glass, the smoothness you can get out of the 36mp with vintage glass is nice, the aberrations make the images look more natural (some of them)
nikkor-p 105 2.5 silver nose on d800 (not the 9 bladed version)
creamy close up bokeh
http://s8.postimg.org/wvx00kqgz/sonnar3.jpg
http://s8.postimg.org/ftzkkqm83/sonnar6.jpg
slightly swilrly
http://s8.postimg.org/s672byzgj/sonnar4.jpg
contrast/sharpness medium-long distance
http://s8.postimg.org/5nmdo0cg3/sonnar7.jpg
Last edited by araucaria on Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:23 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
Quote: |
I think the range finder 10.5cm is the same as the silver nose nikkor-p 10.5 2.5 (sonnar) , so it will be a nice complement to the other 105 2.5 which is supposed to be sharper. (I only have the sonnar but a friend owns the newer one) |
interesting, cheers
i think i went 85 > 200/4, later 180/2.8, totally skipped the 105/2.5, tho i did have a 100mm 2.8 E for awhile .. another underlooked little lens
nice samples, thanks for posting, great to see
looks like i might be on to something worth pursuing then, tho perhaps not worth losing sleep over ..
also the range finder 10.5cm and the other 105 2.5 are probably a bit lighter, tho im not sure by how much, every little helps at my age
wheres that street btw? nice lamps ..
the other lens i'm wondering about in this range is the Micro-Nikkor 105mm 2.8
totally different set of talents tho |
|
Back to top |
|
|
araucaria
Joined: 16 Jan 2014 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2014 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
araucaria wrote:
That street is in lisbon.
It's the same size although a tad thinner and weights less than than the 85 1.8. Actually it looks kinda funny on the d800 because it's so small. It makes the 135 DC look like something totally overengineered (that lens is twice as big and heavy)
The 105 2.8 macro seems to be as big as the 135 2 dc
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
wicked curve them lenses make ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
gah .. package just arrived with AF NIKKOR 28-85mm 3.5-4.5, he sent the wrong thing
schwitters
more stupid waiting
EDIT: hes noticed his mistake
wotta plonker
Last edited by etorix on Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RnR
Joined: 11 Jul 2012 Posts: 283 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
RnR wrote:
araucaria wrote: |
I think the range finder 10.5cm is the same as the silver nose nikkor-p 10.5 2.5 (sonnar) , so it will be a nice complement to the other 105 2.5 which is supposed to be sharper. (I only have the sonnar but a friend owns the newer one) |
The gauss version is crazy sharp. Made it to the 5 star list by Esox lucius in this thread - http://forum.mflenses.com/zeiss-nikon-voigtlaender-which-pass-the-d800-36mpix-test-t53510.html
One from the weekend - wide open;
_________________ Currently shooting with Fuji X-E2s + Metabones Speedbooster + m42 and CY glass 💕
Cheers, Hasse |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
great sharp
i dont get a turn in this game yet tho |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2014 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
85mm 1.8 now allegedly arriving Thursday
believe it when i see it
he wants his AF-Nikkor zoom back too
which he's welcome to, after this 85mm passes a closer inspection ..
if he had provided a return address .. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
I don't know what body you'd use the 85 on...but you should know that the 28-85 is a VERY good lens...a bit soft at the edges wide open on the 35mm sensor, but stopped down to 5.6 it's uniformly sharp corner to corner...one might think that that's not so hot, but consider the higher ISO quality of the current generation of sensors, like that in D610 where 3200 is yesterdays ISO 800, F5.6 is a fine general purpose walk-about lens, whether AF or MF (as I had used on my Canon dSLRs)...a bargain at under $50
As for the 85s....the 1.8 is larger/heavier than the later F2 version....just as the 135/2.8 AIS Nikkor is larger than the earlier 135/2.8Q, the larger versions of both are very well balanced on the larger dSLR bodies...
Two of my 85 Nikkors....I kept the "K" version as it was "Ai'd" and I can now use it on my new D610...(note the 3 holes in the focusing barrel of the "H" version...screw holes used to attach a post for "pulling" focus during a tracking shot in video mode).
85x2BAR by kitaflix, on Flickr _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
heh, i have no modern Nikon bodies to use that AF zoom on, its not what i paid for anyway, its not mine, its going back [after i get the 85]
nor do i know much about zooms .. i'm not really interested tbh
as i said above this copy of the 85mm1.8 was made at an interesting time
i will be using it on Panasonic Lumix G3 initially, then G1
probably on Canon 650d later |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
Let me/us know how it works on the G3....I have a cuzin with the G3 and we are going on a trip together and she may like using a Nikkor on it... _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
mfkita wrote: |
Let me/us know how it works on the G3....I have a cuzin with the G3 and we are going on a trip together and she may like using a Nikkor on it... |
hmm she may find this a bit heavy, there are much lighter Nikkors, like the 100mm 2.8 E
is there a particular concern you have?
i must admit to not having got round to trying any other Nikkors on the G3 yet, i've hardly had it a week
well, except 2 old rangefinder ones, but neither will focus on it,and i cant see why [PITA]
just tried a Nikkor 135m 2.8 on the G3, seems works fine
i use A, manually set aperture
press the wheel in, to finefocus
turn the wheel, to change magnification
EDIT heh the 85mm1.8 arrived while i was posting this
seems near mint, amazing condition,really clean
tried a few shots real quick, seem works, shame its raining
but i do have to go to the PostOffice ..
and gah .. the lenshood i thought fitted it doesnt, dang
ive put a modern HN-3 on for the time being |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mfkita
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 222
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
mfkita wrote:
Glad you got a minty...!
As for my cuz, I think you're right about the weight/balance...I'll bring a vivitar 28/2 and 50/1.8 series e for low light night shooting that she might like....
Enjoy your 85! _________________ I favor the simple shot...and uncomplicated technology that won't distract me from seeing it...
NIKON D610, Canon 30D/450D/s90/A570is: Canon 35/2, 50/1.8 MKI, 18-55IS, 28-105/3.5-4.5, 70-210/3.5-4.5; MF Nikkors 50/2K, 50/1.4AIS, 60/2.8 Micro, 85/1.8-K (AI'd), 135/2.8K, 135/2.8Q.C, 180/2.8ED, 200/4Q (AI-cut), 200/4AIS, 300/4.5-H (AI'd), Olympus 24/2.8, Vivitar 28/2, Vivitar S1 70-210/3.5 and S1 28-90;Tamron sp90/2.5; (and 28-85 AF nikkor), 35mm Nikon F, FM, FE2/MD12 drive |
|
Back to top |
|
|
etorix
Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2014 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
etorix wrote:
good choice
heh, me i cant quite believe this lens, its so nice, and its here, and its actually mine
i have to keep picking it up to look at it again, to reassure myself like
it arrived with the correct vintage front cap, but a very modern AF-stylee rear
so has it been on a minty F2 or F all this time, in a showcase or so
its definitely had little or no use, hardly ANY dust even
i havent even found cleaning-marks yet either |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|