| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 1471
Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:30 pm Post subject: 3D with Contax 35/1.4 on Sony A7Rii |
 |
|
Pontus wrote:
What do you think? Does this lens have the 3D effect that everyone is raving about?
_________________
Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10532
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
POP! Looks like to me.
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10471
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
_________________
T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 1098
Location: Jakarta
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
Sorry but this kind of lens with high microcontrast at the plane of sharp focus, ugly bokeh and strong longitudinal chromatic aberration is not my cup of tea... But I understand others might like this kind of rendering!
Cheers!
Abbazz
_________________
Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16541
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
| Abbazz wrote: |
Sorry but this kind of lens with high microcontrast at the plane of sharp focus, ugly bokeh and strong longitudinal chromatic aberration is not my cup of tea... But I understand others might like this kind of rendering!
Cheers!
Abbazz |
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 3678
Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2018 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
No, for me there is no "3D effect" at all. Either it is 3D (two pictures captured with two lenses) and viewed accordingly or it's not. IMHO there is nothing like a "3D effect" in existence.
| Abbazz wrote: |
| Sorry but this kind of lens with high microcontrast at the plane of sharp focus, ugly bokeh and strong longitudinal chromatic aberration is not my cup of tea... |
Fully agree.
_________________
Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 1552
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2018 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
The first one has really good pop. The last two probably need f/2.8 or f/4 to shine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2018 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| Abbazz wrote: |
Sorry but this kind of lens with high microcontrast at the plane of sharp focus, ugly bokeh and strong longitudinal chromatic aberration is not my cup of tea... But I understand others might like this kind of rendering!
Cheers!
Abbazz |
I wouldn't write/say it in such a drastic way, but i never really liked the 1.4/35mm lenses. Until the appearance of the Sigma 1.4/35mm they had a quite low overall performance, even stopped down to f5.6 (e. g. Nikkor 1.4/35mm, Minolta AF 1.4/35mm and Zeiss CY 1.4/35mm). In addition the bokeh usually isn't that nice. And i prefer the 55-58mm range or the 20mm range over the 35mm / 28mm ...
That said, i must admit that i've taken a few quite nice shots with the Minolta/Sony AF 1.4/35mm in bars and restaurants: Shooting portraits wide open (distance of about 0.8 - 1 m) "dissolves" the background very smoothly. The bokeh of the Minolta/Sony AF 1.4/35mm is very good at shorter distances!
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017
Posts: 696
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2018 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
That said, i must admit that i've taken a few quite nice shots with the Minolta/Sony AF 1.4/35mm in bars and restaurants: Shooting portraits wide open (distance of about 0.8 - 1 m) "dissolves" the background very smoothly. |
Nighttime/indoors-situations are exactly why I'm considering either a pre-apsherical Summilux-M 35 or the CV 1.2/40. Currently investigating which focal length suits me best. The Leitz has some glow wide open, which is a matter of taste, but has the distinct advantage of not having any focus shift. I'm not sure about the CV 1.2/40 but the 1.4 35&40 are notorious for their focus shift. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Posts: 2169
Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Definitely not 3D,no pop and distracting background......
_________________
Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 1471
Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2018 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
I'm definitely no fan of the bokeh myself but why the attitude folks?
_________________
Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10471
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
| Pontus wrote: |
| why the attitude folks? |
just jealousy 
_________________
T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 1098
Location: Jakarta
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
| Pontus wrote: |
| I'm definitely no fan of the bokeh myself but why the attitude folks? |
I am sorry for the misunderstanding but I thought that your original post ("What do you think?") was intended to gather opinions about this lens. I had no intention to hurt your feelings.
Cheers!
Abbazz
_________________
Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 1471
Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2018 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
| Abbazz wrote: |
| Pontus wrote: |
| I'm definitely no fan of the bokeh myself but why the attitude folks? |
I am sorry for the misunderstanding but I thought that your original post ("What do you think?") was intended to gather opinions about this lens. I had no intention to hurt your feelings.
Cheers!
Abbazz |
I appreciate your input and I was asking for honest opinions. My feelings were not hurt by you or anyone else. But if you read the comments I'm sure that you can sense the negativity. This general hostility that creeps up from time to time on this forum is why I left a couple of years ago. Not much has changed.
_________________
Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
folderholder
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 102
Location: California
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
folderholder wrote:
For me, these are good examples of good 3D depth. What apertures did you use?
_________________
Best wishes,
Peter
www.pandacollector.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 1471
Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2018 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
| folderholder wrote: |
| For me, these are good examples of good 3D depth. What apertures did you use? |
All were taken at f1.4
_________________
Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
