Posted: Wed May 29, 2019 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
zzzxtreme wrote:
| kypfer wrote: |
| zzzxtreme wrote: |
| kypfer wrote: |
I have a Sun 200mm f/2.8 in M42 which would probably meet most of your requirements, but at 750gm it's getting just a little too heavy to be carried around comfortably.
The solution I often use for "extreme" bokeh is a 135mm lens with a short extension tube. I have a selection, they are all good, but the effects do differ so it can be a case of experimenting to achieve the most pleasing effect, depending on the subject.
Good luck. |
short extension tube? never thought of that. My limited experience with extention tubes is it only works with very small objects? I got to check it out |
Most "bokeh" subjects, as I see it, are only a few feet away, with an out-of-focus background disappearing into the distance. With a 12mm extension tube on the back of any 135mm lens the furthest it will focus is about 5ft, so I can place myself so that my subject is around 3-5ft in front of me, move about a bit to get the background looking as I like it, and fire away. At 3ft my APSC Pentax "sees" about a 4 inch wide subject, at 5ft the subject is around a foot across. Measurements may well vary slightly between different lenses, especially regarding the minimum focus distance, I've just made these ball-park tests in my lounge with a Tamron 135mm and a tape measure. I see no practical use in making further tests, you've probably got completely different lenses to me and the numbers will be different if your tube is a 10 or a 15mm rather than my 12mm.
For the few seconds it'll take, check it out, you might like it  |
doing some googling now. plenty people seems to be against it (out of ignorance maybe) lol and there are not many discussion about it. i do want to experiment. I'm able to find 12-17mm m42 focusing helicoid (if I decide on takumars) |