View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:01 pm Post subject: 1st developed roll, disaster |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I have developed my first roll (I mean, first on my own, I don't count those at the course).
It turned out a disaster
The film was all sticked together, like one solid unity, it looked like glued.
Only the first 1-2 poses in the beginning and end were developed.
What did I do wrong? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CarbonR
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 Posts: 1969 Location: Clermont-Ferrand, France
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CarbonR wrote:
Some times the problem comes from the film : I already had hard time to put the roll on the spiral, when it had been developped, I understood : some of the perforations were broken _________________ Cameras : Canon 5D, Pentax K100D, Pentax 6x7, Spotmatic
Lenses : 15mm to 1000mm (24x36)
My websites : [FR & ENG]Takumar - the eyes of the Spotmatic : info about all Takumar lenses // Kogaku - My photo site
I am selling : Takumar lenses and rare Pentax bodies, pm me if you're interested in something [MFLenses feed-back]
Information on Takumar lenses with samples :
Wide angle : Takumar 15/3.5 15mm, Takumar 17/4 17mm, Takumar 18/11 18mm, Takumar 20/4.5 20mm, Takumar 24/3.5 24mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V1 28mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V2 28mm, Takumar 35/2 V1 35mm, Takumar 35/2 V2 35mm, Takumar 35/2.3 35mm, Takumar 35/3.5 35mm, Takumar 35/4 35mm
Standard : Takumar 50/1.4 V1 50mm, Takumar 50/1.4 V2 50mm, Takumar 50/3.5 50mm, Takumar 50/4 50mm, Takumar 55/2 55/1.8 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V1 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V2 55mm, Takumar 58/2 58mm, Takumar 58/2.4 58mm
Short tele : Takumar 83/1.9 83mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85/1.9 85mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85mm, Takumar 100/2 100mm, Takumar 100/3.5 100mm, Takumar 100/4 100mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V1 105mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V2 105mm, Takumar 120/2.8 120mm
Telephoto : Takumar 135/2.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/2.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 150/4 V1 150mm, Takumar 150/4 V2 150mm
Long tele : Takumar 200/3.5 200mm, Takumar 200/4 200mm, Takumar 200/5.6 200mm, Takumar 300/4 V1 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V2 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V3 300mm, Takumar 300/6.3 300mm, Takumar 400/5.6 400mm, Takumar 500/4.5 500mm, Takumar 500/5 500mm, Takumar 1000/8 V1 1000mm, Takumar 1000/8 V2 1000mm
Zoom : Zoom-Takumar 45~125/4 , Zoom-Takumar 70~150/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 85~210/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 135~600/6.7
Achromatic : Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85/4.5 , Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 300/5.6 300mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I don't know, I loaded the spiral like I tried many times, the film was rolled in, but evidently with no separation, why? And why it was glued together?
Damn... I lost what I expected to be some great photos. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
What film was it?
I'm not sure I understand what happened. Was the film not on the spiral correctly or something? _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:15 pm Post subject: Re: 1st developed roll, disaster |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
Orio wrote: |
I have developed my first roll (I mean, first on my own, I don't count those at the course).
It turned out a disaster
The film was all sticked together, like one solid unity, it looked like glued.
Only the first 1-2 poses in the beginning and end were developed.
What did I do wrong? |
Orio,
Did you use metal or plastic reel?
Jules |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: Re: 1st developed roll, disaster |
|
|
Orio wrote:
lulalake wrote: |
Orio,
Did you use metal or plastic reel?
Jules |
Plastic reel.
The tank brand is "Kaiser".
@ Martin
Film was Kodak Tri-X
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carlsson
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 793 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlsson wrote:
Sorry to hear Orio. I'm sure that something went wrong with the reel. _________________
Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
https://mariaeero.com/contax/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4572 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
sorry for the disappointment
but this is to learn..
sounds like a problem with the reel, actually as if the film was not loaded correctly _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
This is Attila Jr (backfocused), you can see on the left it begins to disappear into non-developed:
and a couple of weirdos that came out of the roll:
Tri-X 4oo pushed to 1600 _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
I had a Kaiser tank (sounds like some mighty German war-machine, but I mean a developing tank), and I didn't like it much—using Jobo tanks now. One problem with the reel in my Kaiser tank was that it has no indented spot where one can feel (with one's finger) that the film has gone properly on the spiral, so if it gets loaded incorrectly for some reason, it's difficult to tell in the dark…
I don't know why yours didn't load properly in the first place, however. Did you cut off the film leader and the end where it attaches to the spool? These can cause problems if left in. Another possibility is that the reel may have come loose during development, but I suppose you'd have noticed that.
I'd try loading an expendable test roll (e.g. this one if you didn't cut it up and if you managed to “unglue” it) in the dark like you would for real, then check that it has gone on properly, and perhaps even try shaking it around a closed tank with some water in there to see that something isn't broken and systematically coming loose during agitation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marty
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
The film has to run smooth thru the groves. Did it maybe get stuck while loading and did you forced it trying to free it? In this case the film could have jumped from one grove to the next getting in contact with the subsequent coil, then the liquids made the rest of the mess: the wet emulsion is very sticky. Now let's examine another possibility that come to my mind. Did you trim the corners in the beginning of the film? This practice is often recommended to facilitate the loading operation and it's, in my experience, perfectly correct, but ... there is a but: if you overdo the film is going to jump and we return to the previous described situation.
This is all what comes to my mind at the moment, hope it helps to shine a bit of light over the arcane.
Cheers, Marty. _________________ Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
supahmario
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 615 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
supahmario wrote:
Orio wrote: |
|
i like this one! _________________ EOS 5D, EOS 30
Leica-R: Summicron 2/50
QBM: Distagon 2.8/35
PK: Tokina 3.5/17, Porst 1.2/55
M42: S-M-C Takumar 3.5/24, S-M-C Takumar 1.8/55, CZJ MC Sonnar 3.5/135, Jupiter 21M 4/200
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:59 am Post subject: Re: 1st developed roll, disaster |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Orio wrote: |
I have developed my first roll (I mean, first on my own, I don't count those at the course).
It turned out a disaster
The film was all sticked together, like one solid unity, it looked like glued.
Only the first 1-2 poses in the beginning and end were developed.
What did I do wrong? |
My guess is insert film inside too far before winding -- teeth get spread apart, film winds onto itself instead of suspending, gets glued together when wet. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Thanks for all the suggestions!
I will try to find a different tank than Kaiser - the local seller here only has Kaiser stuff.
Maybe the problem is that I did not feel when the loading ended and went too far?
Is it possible that by continuing spinning the "thing", the film already loaded will fold over itself?
About the end of the film, I did cut it, but I am not sure if I left some plastic in - difficult to tell in the dark
As for corners, yes I have cut them round...
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10531 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Orio wrote: |
... Maybe the problem is that I did not feel when the loading ended and went too far?
Is it possible that by continuing spinning the "thing", the film already loaded will fold over itself? ... |
Could happen, yes.
Load in daylight with some bad old film to watch closely what happens in there, how that could happen again.
Too bad about it, sorry for you. Unlike lab mess up or lost, no free roll here. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51BB), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marty
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Maybe the problem is that I did not feel when the loading ended and went too far?
Is it possible that by continuing spinning the "thing", the film already loaded will fold over itself? |
It's surely possible, but you should have forced to make the film go beyond the end point. I think you should have noticed that. If you trimmed the corners too much that could have made easier for the film to go beyond the end point. All this is only possible if you cut off the spool before loading, otherwise the spool itself would have hit the guide at the loading point of the reel and stopped there ( at least in my reels). So cutting off the spool only after loading is a good method to avoid going beyond.
Orio wrote: |
About the end of the film, I did cut it, but I am not sure if I left some plastic in - difficult to tell in the dark |
Do you mean the tape which holds the film to spool? In this case it's not gonna do any harm. If you mean you could have cut off a bit of the spool I would say it's unlikely, too hard for not to notice.
Cheers, Marty. _________________ Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Disappointing for you Orio, but don't give up. I think one of two things happened - either the film got stuck in the groove and continuing to feed it in caused a "concertina" effect, or the end popped out of the groove and feeding in just wound the film onto itself every turn. I think the second is more likely.
Arkku's suggestion to practice with an expendable roll in daylight is excellent. At first you can watch the process of feeding in to see how it works, then you can practice with your eyes shut till you're confident. I wouldn't necessarily blame the tank till you've tested it.
What caused your film to feed wrongly? Could be a few things. Rounding the corners is something I've never done, I just snip off about 3mm at 45° so the sharp corners don't catch. Could be the reel was slightly damp? It needs to be desert dry - a short shot with a hairdryer just before loading is a good idea. Did you use the tank previously? Any old chemicals left in the groove will be hygroscopic salts which become slightly damp just from vapour in the air. Really thorough cleaning and drying is essential.
Forcing the feed when you feel a restriction, even just slightly, will end up with a problem. It needs to feel smooth right to the end of the film. That's why I never cut off the canister till the film is loaded. If you feel a restriction you can wind the film back and take a look. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6943 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I've found Ilford films to be a bit flimsy and have a habit of coming out of the spool; that's why I asked what film it was. Fuji films are much stiffer and I didn't get a problem with them. One tip I've been given is to put the film in the fridge for a while to stiffen it slightly. I haven't tried that yet though.
Loading the film into the tank is the only part of developing I find annoying. Until you get proficient in it it's an idea not to take any important shots. Also, sacrifice a roll of film of the type you wish to develope and just practice loading the spiral. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Thank you all for the advices.
Martin, I don't think that putting the film in fridge before developing is a good idea. The chemicals have to be at least at 20°C and the emulsion layer is sensitive to thermal choc.
Chemicals need to be the right temp. Letting the tank stand at room temperature after loading will solve the problem. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
My daughter ran into the same problem at photo camp... she's still not quite over the experience.
Some times, for no apparent reason, the film simply refuses to go smoothly. Other times, there are no problems whatsoever. When it refuses, there's nothing but to try to notice and start all over again. Sometimes it takes a few tries. Usually, if something is going wrong, it's apparent right away - the film should snake freely onto the spiral... and when all in, twisting the reel and pushing the end should make the whole film snake further into the spiral. If it doesn't, there may be a misfeed. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marty
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
It looks like a good thing to remind that the reel must be absolutely, totally dry otherwise the film will stick no matter what.
Marty. _________________ Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1631 Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
bad news Orio, but nevermind try again. I have to add that Marty is totally correct, but if the reel was just a bit wet, you couldn't put all the film into the reel, this is plain impossible as the gelatin makes the film "inflate"
As for trying in day light, it a very good idea, i proceed that way, oh its simple in daylight , but when all's dark it another story Took me about 30 minutes and 6 times pulling the film off the reel in order to make it go straight in the reel. Worked .
Do'nt give up ! Go very slowly and try to lead the edges of the film with your thumbs. If there's some resistance and the film blocks, release it a bit backwards if needed ( where it blocked ) and go again.
Now my times of loadin a reel have dropped to 5 minutes. I am the Usain Bolt of slowness _________________ Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lulalake
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 1191 Location: Near Austin Texas
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lulalake wrote:
Carlsson wrote: |
Sorry to hear Orio. I'm sure that something went wrong with the reel. |
I think you are right. It may be that the reel separated a tiny amount during an inversion and allowed the film to come out of the grooves.
Orio I wouldn't use that reel again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|